Research Article
A Review of Articles that Include the Schools’ Readiness Dimension

Hulya Kartal , Fatih Guner

350 866

Article Metrics

Views

 

350

Downloads

 

866

Citations

Crossref

0

Scopus

8


Kartal H, Guner F. A review of articles that include the schools’ readiness dimension. European J Ed Res. 2018;7(3):431,443. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.7.3.431
Kartal, H., & Guner, F. (2018). A review of articles that include the schools’ readiness dimension. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 431,443. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.3.431
Kartal Hulya, and Fatih Guner. "A Review of Articles that Include the Schools’ Readiness Dimension," European Journal of Educational Research 7, no. 3 (2018): 431,443. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.3.431
Kartal, H & Guner, 2018, 'A review of articles that include the schools’ readiness dimension', European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 431,443. Kartal, Hulya, and Fatih Guner. "A Review of Articles that Include the Schools’ Readiness Dimension." European Journal of Educational Research, vol. 7, no. 3, 2018, pp. 431,443, https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.3.431.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to review the academic papers written in Turkey on the subject of school readiness, with regard to one of the dimensions of school readiness, that of schools’ readiness for children. The examinations were carried out using one of the qualitative research designs, namely the nested case study design. The study universe consists of 45 articles in Turkish that include the subject of school readiness published in 26 academic journals between the years 2012-2017. With the purposeful sampling method, 14 academic papers that include the dimension of schools’ readiness for children were taken as the study sample. The obtained data were analyzed by descriptive content analysis. The analysis results show that half of the studies reviewed were published in the year 2014. It was observed that in the papers, among the components of the dimension of schools’ readiness for children, the schools’ physical readiness component was most often mentioned. In the articles including the schools’ physical readiness component, it was observed that mainly, findings indicating that schools were not physically suitable for first-year pupils’ level of physical development had been made. As for the component of teachers’ readiness, research findings were accessed relating to the fact that teachers were not prepared for students in terms of their attitudes and values as well as their professional knowledge and skills. Moreover, in the articles, in terms of readiness of the schedule for students, findings were accessed regarding the fact that primary school programmes were not suitable for the levels of the students or for their levels of readiness.

Keywords: School readiness, ready school, ready teacher, ready programme


References

Altintas, E. (2015). Birinci siniflarda uygulanan uyum ve hazirlik calismalarinin ogretmen goruslerine gore degerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of adaptation and preparation studies applied in first classes according to teachers’ views] (master thesis). Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize.

Anne Cocuk Egitim Vakfi [ACEV]. (2012). 222 Sayili Ilkogretim ve egitim kanunu ile bazi kanunlarda degisiklik yapilmasina dair kanun teklifi ile ilgili gorus ve oneriler. Retrieved from http://www.acev.org/docs/default-document library/yeni_kanun_teklifi_okul_oncesi_egitim.pdf

Ari, A. (2014). Ilkokul birinci sinifa baslama yasina iliskin ogretmen gorusleri [Teacher views about the starting age of the first grade elementary school]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(3), 1031-1047. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2014.3.2117

Bay, D. N. & Simsek, C. O. (2014). Anasinifindan ilkokula geciste yasanan sorunlar ve cozum onerileri [Passing problems from kindergarden to primary school and alternative implementaion recommended]. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 30, 163-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS2598

Bayat, S. (2015). Ilkokuma yazma ogretiminde 60-66 aylik cocuklar ile ilgili yasanan gucluklere iliskin ogretmen gorusleri [Teachers’ opinions regarding the difficulties encountered by 60-66 month-old children in basic reading and writing]. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 4, 172-185.

Baydar, N., Kuntay, A., Goksen, F., Yagmurlu, B. & Cemalcilar, Z. (2008). Turkiye’de erken cocukluk gelisim ekolojileri [TECGE] calismasi [The study of early childhood developmental ecologies in Turkey]. Retrieved from http://portal.ku.edu.tr/~tecge/kufener_sayi3.pdf

Bogazici Universitesi. (2012). 5.1.1961 tarih ve 222 sayili ilkogretim ve egitim kanunu ile bazi kanunlarda degisiklik yapilmasina dair kanun teklifi hakkinda Bogazici Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi’nin guncellenen gorusu. Retrieved from http://www.fed.boun.edu.tr/form_files/son.pdf

Boz, T. & Yildirim, A. (2014). 4+4+4 egitim sisteminde birinci sinif ogretmenlerinin karsilastigi zorluklar [The challenges faced by the teachers of 1st grade in the 4+4+4 education system]. Baskent University Journal of Education1(2), 54-65.

Britto, P. R. (2012). School readiness and transitions. New York: Education Section Programme Division, UNICEF. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/publications/files/CFS_School_Readiness_E_web.pdf

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments in nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Buldu, M. & Er, S. (2016). Okula hazirbulunusluk ve okula baslama yasi: Turk ogretmen ve ailelerin yeni egitim politikasi uzerine gorus ve deneyimleri [School readiness and school entry-age: Views and experiences of Turkish teachers and families on a new educational policy]. Education and Science41(187), 97-114. DOI: 10.15390/EB.2016.6292

Calik, M., Unal, S., Costu, B. & Karatas, F.O. (2008). Trends in Turkish Science Education. Essays in Education, Special Edition, 23-45.

Caliskan Dedeoglu, N. ve Alat, Z. (2012). Okul oncesi egitim ve ilkogretim programlarinin matematik konu kazanimlari temelinde uyumu. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice12(3), 2263-2288.

Cerit, Y., Akgun, N., Yildiz, K., & Soysal, M. R. (2014). Yeni egitim sisteminin (4+4+4) uygulanmasinda yasanan sorunlar ve cozum onerileri (Bolu il ornegi) [Problems and solutions for the processing of the application of the new schooling system (4+4+4) (City of Bolu Sample)]. Journal of Educational Sciences Research4(1), 59-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/jesr.2014.4os4a

Demirtas-Zorbas, S. (2016). Ilkokul birinci sinif ogrencilerinin okula uyumu: Bir model testi [School adjustment of primary school students: A model test] (doctoral dissertation). Hacettepe University, Ankara.

Demir Yildiz, C. & Donmez, B. (2017). Ekolojik sistemler kurami cercevesinde yoneticilerin karar verme davranisini etkileyen faktorlerin incelenmesi [Investigation of environmental factors affecting decion making process of managers within the framework of ecological system theory]. Turkish Studies, 12(28), 223-244. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12328

Erkan, S. (2011). Farkli sosyoekonomik duzeydeki ilkogretim birinci sinif ogrencilerinin okula hazirbulunusluklarinin incelenmesi [A study on the school readiness of first graders from different socio-economiic levels]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40, 186-197.

Erkan, S. & Kirca, A. (2010). Okul oncesi egitimin ilkogretim birinci sinif ogrencilerinin okula hazirbulunusluklarina etkisinin incelenmesi [A study on the effects of preschool education on primary first graders’ school preparedness]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 38, 94-106.

Erturk Kara, H. G. & Gozcu, S. (2015). Okula hazir olma konusunda ogretmen ve aile gorusleri: Bir olgu bilim calismasi [Teachers’ and parents’ views on school readiness: A phenomenological study]. Ahi Evran University Kirsehir Faculty of Education Journal16(2), 391-408.

Harman, G. & Celikler, D. (2012). Egitimde hazirbulunuslugun onemi uzerine bir derleme calismasi [A review study about important of readiness in education], Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(3), 147-156.

Isikoglu Erdogan, N. & Simsek, Z. C. (2014). Birinci sinifa baslayan cocuklarin, velilerin ve ogretmenlerin okula uyumlarinin incelenmesi [Investigation of school readiness of first grade children, parents and teachers]. International Journal of New Trends in Arts, Sports & Science Education, 3(2), 62-70.

Ilkogretim ve Egitim Kanunu ile Bazi Kanunlarda Degisiklik Yapilmasina Dair Kanun. (2012).  T.C. Resmi Gazete, 28261, 11 Nisan 2012.

Kartal, H. & Guner, F. (2017). Okul oncesi egitim programi etkinlik kitabindaki etkinliklerin sesbilgisi farkindaligi acisindan incelenmesi [Analysis of the activities in the activity book preschool education program in terms of phonetic awareness]. Journal of Mother Tongue Education, 5(1), 14-30. DOI: 10.16916/aded.269445

Kocyigit, S. (2014). Okul oncesi donem cocuklarinin ilkokul hakkindaki gorusleri [Preschool age children’s views about primary school]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice14(5), 1891-1874. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2014.5.2393

Kutluca Canbulat, A. N. & Yildizbas, F. (2014). Okul oncesi ve sinif ogretmenlerinin 60-72 aylik cocuklarin okula hazir bulunusluklarina iliskin gorusleri [Preschool and Classroom teachers’ views on 62-72 months children’s school readiness. Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 14(1), 33-50.

Lippman, L. H., Moore, K. A., & McIntosh, H. (2011). Positive indicators of child well-being: A conceptual framework, measures, and methodological issues. Applied Research In Quality of Life6(4), 425-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-011-9138-6

Margetts, K. (1999). Transition to school: Looking forward. Retrieved from https://extranet.education.unimelb.edu.au/LED/tec/pdf/margetts1.pdf

McTurk N., Nutton G., Lea T, Robinson G. & Carapetis J. (2008). The School readiness of Australian Indigenous Children: A review of the literature. Darwin: Menzies School Of Health.

Meisels, S. J. (1998). Assessing readiness. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED429272.pdf

Memisoglu, S. P. & Ismetoglu, M. (2013). Zorunlu egitimde 4+4+4 uygulamasina iliskin okul yoneticilerinin gorusleri [The school administrators’ conceptions concerning the system of 4+4+4 in compulsory education]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(2), 14-25.

Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Milli Egitim Bakanligi [MEB]. (2013a). Okul Oncesi Egitim Programi. Milli Egitim Bakanligi Temel Egitim Genel Mudurlugu. Ankara: Milli Egitim Basimevi. Retrieved from http://www.onceokuloncesi.com/okuloncesi_egitimprogrami.pdf

Milli Egitim Bakanligi [MEB]. (2013b). Okul Oncesi Egitim Programi Etkinlik Kitabi. Retrieved from http://anaokulu.cu.edu.tr/__/file/OOEP_2013_Etkinlik_Kitabi.pdf

Milli Egitim Bakanligi Ilkogretim Kurumlari Yonetmeliginde Degisiklik Yapilmasina Dair Yonetmelik. (2012). T.C. Resmi Gazete, 28735, 14 Agustos 2013.

Milli Egitim Bakanligi Ilkogretim Kurumlari Yonetmeliginde Degisiklik Yapilmasina Dair Yonetmelik. (2012). T.C. Resmi Gazete, 28360, 21 Temmuz 2012.

Milli Egitim Bakanligi Temel Egitim Genel Mudurlugu’nun 5.6.2012 tarihli ve “Okul planlamalari” konulu yazisi. Retrieved from https://tegm.meb.gov.tr/dosya/OKUL%20PLANLAMALARI0001.pdf

National Education Goals Panel [NEGP]. (1998). Ready schools. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel. Retrieved from http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/negp/reports/readysch.pdf

Orta Dogu Teknik Universitesi [ODTU]. (2012). 5.1.1961 tarih ve 222 sayili ilkogretim ve egitim kanunu ile bazi kanunlarda degisiklik yapilmasina dair kanun teklifi hakkinda ODTU Egitim Fakultesi Ilkogretim Bolumu gorusu. Retrieved from

http://old.fedu.metu.edu.tr/web/documents/other/222sayilIlkogretimveEgitimKanunuHakkindaEgitimFakultesiIlkogretimBolumuGorusu_s1.pdf

Ogretmen Yetistirme ve Gelistirme Genel Mudurlugu [OYGM]. (2017). Ogretmenlik meslegi genel yeterlikleri. Retrieved fromhttp://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_12/11115355_YYRETMENLYK_MESLEYY_GENEL_YETERLYKLERY.pdf

Ozenc, M. & Cekirdekci, S. (2013). Ilkokul 1. sinifa kaydolan okul oncesi donem cagindaki ogrencilerin (60-69 ay) yasadiklari sorunlara iliskin ogretmen gorusleri [Teachers’ opinions about the problems experienced by pre-school children, aged 60-69 months, enrolled in the first grade of the elementary school]. Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 13 (2), 177-192.

Saglam, H. I. & Besen, T. (2015). Sinif ogretmenlerinin 60-66 aylik cocuklarin ilkokula baslamasiyla ilgili goruslerinin incelenmesi [Investigating classroom teachers’ views on age of starting primary school for 60-66 months old children]. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences7(2), 167-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2015.02.019

Sahin, I. T., Sak, R. & Tuncer, N. (2013). Okul oncesi ve birinci sinif ogretmenlerinin ilkogretime hazirlik surecine iliskin goruslerinin karsilastirilmasi [A Comparison of preschool and first grade teachers’ views about school readiness]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice13(3), 1691-1713. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2013.3.1665

Senturk, C. (2016). Takvim yasi olarak ilkokul birinci sinif egitimine erken baslayan cocuklarda karsilasilan güclüklere iliskin ogretmen gorüsleri [Teacher opinions on the difficulties encountered in children who start first grade education at an early chronological age]. Journal of European Education6(3), 9-30. DOI: 10.18656/jee.18173

Tantekin Erden, F. & Altun, D. (2014). Sinif ogretmenlerinin okul oncesi egitim ve ilkogretime gecis sureci hakkindaki goruslerinin incelenmesi [An investigation of the opinions of primary school teachers’ on preschool education and the transition process from preschool to primary school]. Elementary Education Online, 13(2), 481-502.

Turk Egitim-Sen (2012). Turk Egitim-Sen 4+4+4 anketinin sonuclarini acikladi. Turkiye Egitim, Ogretim ve Bilim Hizmetleri Kolu Kamu Calisanlari Sendikasi Genel Merkezi Aylik Haber Bulteni, 99, 12. Retrieved from https://www.turkegitimsen.org.tr/lib_yayin/247.pdf

United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF). (2012). School readiness: A conceptual framework.Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/education/files/Chil2Child_ConceptualFramework_FINAL(1).pdf

Uzun, E. M. & Alat, K. (2014). Ilkokul birinci sinif ogretmenlerinin 4+4+4 egitim sistemi ve bu sistem sonrasinda ilkokula baslayan ogrencilerin hazirbulunusliklari hakkindaki gorusleri [First grade teachers’ opinions about the implementation of 4+4+4 education system and school readiness of students. Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 14(2), 15-44.

Unal, D. (2013). Sinif ogretmenlerinin 4+4+4 uygulamasina yonelik gorusleri [First degree classroom teachers’ opinions about 4+4+4 applications]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 2(4), 324-337.

Unver, G. B., Dikbayir, A. & Yurdakul, B. (2015). Kesintili zorunlu egitim ilkokul birinci sinif uygulamalarinin incelenmesi [Investigation of first grade applications in discrete compulsory education]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 23(4), 1647-1664.

Yangin, B. (2013). Okul oncesi egitim programi ve ilkogretim programlarinin karsilastirilmasi. T. Erdogan (Ed.), Ilkokula (Ilkogretime) hazirlik ve Ilkokul (ilkogretim) programlari icinde (ss. 89-109). Ankara: Egiten Kitap.

Yapici, M. & Ulu, F. B. (2010). Ilkogretim birinci sinif ogretmenlerinin okul oncesi ogretmenlerinden beklentileri [First grade teachers’ expectations from preschool teachers]. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 3(1) 43-55.

Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Ankara: Seckin Yayinevi.

Zelyurt, H. & Ozel, E. (2015). Ilkokul birinci sinif okutan sinif ogretmenlerinin egitimde 4+4+4 duzenlemesine iliskin gorusleri [The views of the first grade teachers on 4+4+4 educational regulation. Ahi Evran University Kirsehir Faculty of Education Journal, 16(3), 1-18.