Linguo-Intercultural Sensitivity and its Predictors in EFL in a Bosnian Sample
In this article, the predictive power of five variables relevant for Linguo-intercultural sensitivity (flexibility) is examined. Communication aspect .
- Pub. date: October 15, 2015
- Pages: 141-147
- 646 Downloads
- 875 Views
- 0 Citations
In this article, the predictive power of five variables relevant for Linguo-intercultural sensitivity (flexibility) is examined. Communication aspect of intercultural interactions, specifically, the role of English as an international language are emphasized. Attitudes Towards English and Its Usage Scale (ATEUS) was applied to 194 students who attended to international colleges and schools in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The results suggest that almost all variables are mutually correlated. The findings also reveal Verbal expressiveness and Verbal abilities as statistically significant predictors of linguo-intercultural sensitivity. Other predictors (English competence and Emotional attitudes) do not significantly contribute to explaining Linguo-intercultural variance.
Keywords: Intercultural sensitivity, EFL, ESL, English competence, international students
References
Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56, 57-64.
Aydogan, H. & Akbarov, A. (2014). Attitudes and intercultural sensitivity towards English language teaching. The International Journal of Social Sciences, 20, 50-61.
Bennett, M. J. (1986). A developmental approach to training for intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 179-196.
Bennett, M. (2004). Becoming interculturally competent. In Wurzel, J. (Ed.), Toward Multiculturalism: A reader in multicultural education (2nd ed., pp. 62-77). Newton, MA: Intercultural Resource Corporation.
Blue, J., Kapoor, S., & Comadena, M. (1996). Using cultural values as a measure of intercultural sensitivity. Intercultural Communication Studies, 6, 77-94.
Cubukcu, F. (2013). Pre-service English teachers’ intercultural sensitivity. International Journal of Human Sciences, 10, 832–843.
Dorn, G. & Cavalieri-Koch, A. (2005). Intercultural Skills: A guide to working with other cultures. North West: CILT, the National Centre for Languages.
Hammer, M., Bennett, M., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 421-443.
Hammer, M. & Bennett, M. (2001). The Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI). Portland, OR: Intercultural Communication Institute.
Jantawej, J. & Inada, Y. (2011). Intercultural sensitivity of foreign teachers in Thai public secondary schools. In Katahira, A. (Ed.), The Asian Conference of Education (pp. 273-285). Osaka, Japan: The International Academic Forum (IAFOR).
Knott, V. E., Mak, A. S., & Neill, J. T. (2013). Teaching intercultural competencies in introductory psychology via application of the Excellence in Cultural Experiential Learning and Leadership model. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65, 46–53.
Kovalainen, N. & Keisala, K. (2012). The role of shared foreign language in intercultural communication: A case of working environments. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2, 52-72.
Laopongharn, W. & Sercombe, P. (2009). What relevance does intercultural communication have to language education in Thailand? ARECLS, 6, 59-83.
Lázár, I. (2003). Incorporating Intercultural Communicative Competence in Language Teacher Education. Kapfenberg: Council of Europe Publishing.
Piller, I. (2007). Linguistics and intercultural communication. Language and Linguistic Compass, 1, 208-226.
Riemer, M. J. (2007). Intercultural communication considerations in engineering education. Global J of Engng. Educ., 11, 197-206.
Ruokonen, I. & Kairavuori, S. (2012). Intercultural sensitivity of the Finnish ninth graders. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 32-40.