Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS): Adaptation and Validation in a Normative Turkish Sample

Zeynep Aydin Sunbul , Asude Malkoc, Meltem Aslan Gordesli, Reyhan Arslan, Ferah Cekici


APA 6th edition
Sunbul*, Z.A., Malkoc, A., Gordesli, M.A., Arslan, R., & Cekici, F. (2018). Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS): Adaptation and Validation in a Normative Turkish Sample. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 887-892. doi:10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.887

Harvard
Sunbul* Z.A., Malkoc A., Gordesli M.A., Arslan R., and Cekici F. 2018 'Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS): Adaptation and Validation in a Normative Turkish Sample', European Journal of Educational Research , vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 887-892. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.887

Chicago 16th edition
Sunbul*, Zeynep Aydin , Malkoc, Asude , Gordesli, Meltem Aslan , Arslan, Reyhan and Cekici, Ferah . "Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS): Adaptation and Validation in a Normative Turkish Sample". (2018)European Journal of Educational Research 7, no. 4(2018): 887-892. doi:10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.887

Abstract

The aim of this study was to adapt and validate Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) with a normative Turkish sample. Participants of the study were 330 university students (232 females and 97 males) along with the age mean of 20.22 (SD=1.32). In order to validate the six factor structure of Mindful Self-care Scale, a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. For providing evidence over convergent validity, Mindful Attention Awareness Scale-Adolescent version (Brown, West, Loverich & Biegel, 2011) was concurrently used. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis  displayed satisfactory evidence for the six factor Mindful Self-Care Scale (χ2 / df = 1.7; GFI = 0.87, CFI = 0.92; TLI = .91; RMSEA = 0.05). The scale was also found to be significantly correlated to Mindful Attention Awareness Scale-Adolescent (r=.27, p<.001). Also, the Cronbach Alpha value for the whole scale was found .89 yielding satisfactory evidence for the internal consistency of the instrument. The results of the study tentatively yielded that the Mindful Self-Care Scale is a valid and reliable assessment tool of self-care in Turkish culture. As well, further studies examining the psychometric properties of Mindful Self-Care Scale are still needed with larger and diverse samples.

Keywords: Self-care, mindful self-care scale, mindfulness.


References

Aydin Sunbul, Z. (2016). The relationship between mindfulness and resilience among adolescents: mediating role of self-compassion and difficulties in emotion regulation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Department of Educational Sciences, Ankara.

Bentler, M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.

Braime, H. (2013). From coping to thriving: How to turn self-care into a way of life. England: Individuate Press.

Brown, A. T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (1st ed). New York: Guilford Press.

Brown, K. W., West, A. M., Loverich, T. M., & Biegel, G. M. (2011). Assessing adolescent mindfulness: Validation of an adapted Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in adolescent normative and psychiatric populations. Psychological Assessment, 23, 1023-1033.

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cook-Cottone, C. P. (2015a). Incorporating positive body image into the treatment of eating disorders: A model for attunement and mindful self-care. Body Image, 14, 158–167.

Cook-Cottone, C. P. (2015b). Mindfulness and yoga for self-regulation: A primer for mental health professionals. New York: Springer.

Cook-Cottone, C. P., & Guyker, M. W. (2018). The development and validation of the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS): An assessment of practices that support positive embodiment. Mindfulness, 9:1, 161-175.

Dorociak, E. K. (2005). Development of the Personal and Professional Self-Care Scale. Master's Theses. Paper 3130.http://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/3130.

Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). US: McGraw-Hill Education.

Hambleton, R. K., & Bollwark, J. (1991) Adapting tests for use in different cultures: Technical issues and methods. Bulletin of the International Test Commission, 18, 3-32.

IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Version 20.0. Armonk. NY: IBM Corp.

Kline, B. R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

Linehan, M. M. (2015). DBT skills training handouts and worksheets (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

Riegel, B., Jaarsma, T., & Stromberg, A. (2012). A middle-range theory of self-care of chronic illness. Advances in Nursing Science, 35, 194–204.

Salvucci, P. (2001). Self-care now! 30 tips to help you take care of yourself & minimize caregiver burnout. USA: Pauline Salvucci.

Sidani, S., & Doran, D. (2010). Relationships between processes and outcomes of nurse practitioners in acute care: An exploration. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 25(1), 31–38.

Sousa, V. D., Zauszniewski, J. A., Bergquist-Beringer, S., Musil, C. M., Neese, J. B., & Jaber, A. F. (2010). Reliability validity and factor structure of the Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale - Revised (ASAS-R). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 16, 1031–1040.

Tabachnick. B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2006). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrica, 38, 1-10.

Weinger, K., Butler, H. A., Welch, G. W. & La Greca, A. M. (2005). Measuring diabetes self-care: a psychometric analysis of the Self-Care Inventory-Revised with adults. Diabetes Care; 28: 1346–52.

Ziguras, C. (2004). Self-care: Embodiment, personal autonomy and the shaping of health consciousness. London: Routledge.