A Critical Thinking Assessment Model Integrated with Science Process Skills on Chemistry for Senior High School
Every school should be able to equip students to have the ability to integrate the knowledge gained with real life in responding to global challenges..
- Pub. date: January 15, 2021
- Pages: 285-298
- 1369 Downloads
- 1864 Views
- 7 Citations
Every school should be able to equip students to have the ability to integrate the knowledge gained with real life in responding to global challenges. Assessment of learning outcomes in the form of cognitive and skill aspects must go hand in hand. This study aims to produce: (1) a critical thinking model integrated with the science process, (2) construct validity and reliability instruments that measure the integrated critical thinking skills of science process skills in high school chemistry learning. This assessment model uses the Design and Development approach which refers to the Ellis & Levy model, namely: (1) problem (2) goal setting, (3) model design and development, (4) model testing, (5) evaluation of the test result model, and (6) application model. The validity assessment consisted of 3 measurement and measurement experts, 2 chemistry education experts, and 2 treatments. The trial sample described 289 high school students in Sleman Regency. Proving the validity of the content using the Aiken formula gets a value of 0.923 in the good category. Internal instrument reliability is included in the reliable category with a value of 0.886 (> 0.7), while the Composite Reliability ranges from 0.88 to 0.90. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the value of the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) was 0.021 <0.08, the Chi-Square obtained from <2df testing was 38.29 <2 (34) and the Goodness of fit Index (GFI) was 0.97. > 0.90 or a model declared according to the data obtained in the field and can be used in extensive measurements.
Keywords: Assessment model, critical thinking, science process skills.
References
Abell, M. (2006). Individualizing learning using intelligent technology and universally designed curriculum. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 5(3), 4-20.
Aiken, L.W. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Pepperdine University.
Akinbobola, A. O., & Afolabi, F. (2010). Analysis of science process skills in West African senior secondary school certificate physics practical examinations in Nigeria. American-Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research, 5(4), 234-240.
Al-Rabaani, A. (2014). The acquisition of science process skills by Omani’s pre-service social studies’ teachers. European Journal of Educational Studies, 6(1), 13-19.
Amelia, R. N., & Kriswantoro, K. (2017). Implementation of Item Response Theory for Analysis of Test Items Quality and Students’ Ability in Chemistry. Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Education/ Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.20961/jkpk.v2i1.8512
Areesophonpichet, S. (2013). A development of analytical thinking skills of graduate students by using concept mapping. The Asian Conference on Education.
Azwar, S. (2015). Reliabilitas dan validitas [Reliability and validity]. Pustaka Pelajar.
Badu, S. Q. (2012). Implementasi Evaluasi model Kirkpatrick pada perkuliahan masalah nilai awal dan syarat batas [Implementation of kirkpatrick's evaluation model in the course of initial value and boundary condition problems]. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation/ Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16, 102-129. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i0.1108
Bailin, S. (1987). Critical and creative thinking. Informal Logic, 9(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v9i1.2656
Cantos, A. E., Alday, M. G., Alog, K. J., Asi, K. J., Calacal, R. H., & Britiller, M. C. (2015). Changing learning needs of student nurses: input to the nursing curriculum. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(3), 108-119.
Chabalengula, V. M., Mumba, F., & Mbewe, S. (2012). How pre-service teachers’ understand and perform science process skills. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 8(3), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.832a
Ching, H. S., & Fook, F. S. (2013). Effects of multimedia-based graphic novel presentation on critical thinking among students of different learning approaches. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 56-66.
Coll, R. K., & Lajium, D. (2011) Modeling and the future of science learning. In M. S. Khine & I. M. Saleh, (Eds.), Models and modeling: Cognitive tools for scientific enquiry. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0449-7_1
Crawford, E. O., & Kirby, M. M. (2008). Fostering students’ global awareness: technology applications in social studies teaching and learning. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 2(1), 56-73. https://doi.org/10.3776/joci.%25y.v2i1p56-73
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath and Company.
Durmaz, H., & Mutlu, S. (2014). The effects of an instructional intervention on 7th grade students' science process skills and science achievement. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 43(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.2014.018
Fisher, A. (2011). Critical Thinking: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Gilbert, J. K., & Justi, R. (2016). Modeling-based teaching in science education. Springer.
Gürses, A., Cuya, Ş., Günes, K., & Doğar, Ç. (2014). Determination of the relation between undergraduate students’ awareness levels regarding their scientific process skills and application potentials. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(5), 250-256. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-5-3
Harrell, P. E. (2010). Teaching an integrated science curriculum: Linking teacher knowledge and teaching assignments. Issues in teacher education, 19(1), 145-165.
Hidayati, T., Nugroho, S.E., & Sudarmin. (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik untuk mengidentifikasi keterampilan proses sains dengan tema energi pada pembelajaran ipa terpadu [Development of diagnostic tests to identify science process skills with the theme of energy in integrated science learning]. Unnes Science Education Journal, 2(2), 311-319. https://doi.org/10.15294/USEJ.V2I2.2041
Ismail, Z. H., & Jusoh, I. (2001). Relationship between science process skills and logical thinking abilities of Malaysian students. Journal Of Science And Mathematics Education In Southeast Asia, 24(2), 67-77.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sobrorn, D. (1989) LISREL 7 user’s reference guide. Scientifit Software International.
Karamustafaoğlu, S. (2011). Improving the science process skills ability of science student teachers using I diagrams. International Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education, 3(1), 26-38. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2852-7061
Karsli, F., & Şahin, Ç. (2009). Developing worksheet based on science process skills: Factors affecting solubility. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 1-12.
Kartowagiran, B., Suyanta, Hamdi, S., Jaedun, A., Ahman, Rusijono, & Laliyo, L. A. (2020). Development of web-based application for teacher candidate competence instruments: Preparing professional teachers in the IR 4.0 Era. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1749-1763. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1749
Katchevich, D., Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2013). Argumentation in the chemistry laboratory: Inquiry and confirmatory experiments. Journal of Research in Science Education, 43(1), 317-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9267-9
Keil, C., Haney, J., & Zoffel, J. (2009). Improvements in student achievement and science process skills using environmental health science problem-based learning curricula. The Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 13(1), 1-18.
Ketterlin-Geller, L.R. (2005). Knowing what all students know: Procedures for developing universal design for assessment. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 4(2), 1-22.
Kirsch, I., & Guthrie, J. (1980). Construct Validity of Functional Reading Tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 17(2), 81-93.
Klein, J. D. (2014, April 3-7). Design and development research: A rose by another name [Paper presentation]. American Educational Research Association Conference (AERA) 2014, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Koponen, I. T. (2007). Models and modelling in physics education: A critical re-analysis of philosophical underpinnings and suggestions for revisions. Science & Education, 16(7-8), 751-773. doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9000-7
Kusiak, J., & Brown, D. (2007). Creative Thinking. Technique.
Leonor, J. P. (2015). Exploration of conceptual understanding and science process skills: A basis for differentiated science inquiry curriculum model. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(4), 255-259. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.512
Lukum, A. (2015). Evaluasi program pembelajaran IPA SMP menggunakan model countenance stake [The evaluation of the SMP science learning program uses a stake countenance model]. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation/ Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 25-37. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4552
Marzano, R. J. (2007). The art of science teaching. ASCD.
Munawaroh, H., Sudiyanto, & Riyadi. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of innovative learning model toward critical thinking ability. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(3), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.3.153
Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.846a
Ramadhan, S., Mardapi, D., Prasetyo, Z.K., & Utomo, H.B. (2019). The development of an instrument to measure the higher order thinking skill in physics. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 743-751. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.743
Ramalingam, M., Kasilingam, G., & Chinnavan, E. (2014). Assessment of learning domains to improve student's learning in higher education. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 6(1), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2014.1.5
Resnick, L. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. National Academy Press.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Validitas reliabilitas & karakteristik butir (panduan untuk peneliti, mahasiswa, dan psikometrian) [Reliability validity & item characteristics (guide for researchers, students, and psychometrics)]. Parama Publishing.
Richey, R. C. (2005). Validating instruction design and development models. In J. M. Spector & D. A. Wiley (Eds.), Innovations in instructional technology: Essays in honor of M. David Merrill (pp. 171–185.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Richey, C. R. & Klein, J. D.(2007). Design and development research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rotbain, Y., Marbach‐Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2006). Effect of bead and illustrations models on high school students' achievement in molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 500-529. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20144
Runco, M. A. (1993). Creativity as an educational objective for disadvantaged students. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, The University of Connecticut. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED363074
South African Qualifications Authority. (2014). National policy and criteria for designing and implementing assessment for NQF qualifications and part-qualifications and professional designations in South Africa. https://cutt.ly/bjsrwox
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8(2), 23-74.
Shavelson, R., & Stanton, G. (1975). Construct validation: Methodology and application to three measures of cognitive structure. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12(2), 67-85.
Shirban, S, A. (2018). Enhancing critical thinking in Malaysian primary school students through PLS method. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 4(4), 243-257. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.4.4.243
Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Ellen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of research on educational and technology. Springer.
Subali, B. (2009). Pengukuran keterampilan proses sains pola divergen dalam mata pelajaran biologi SMA di Provinsi DIY dan Jawa Tengah [Measurement of divergent pattern science process skills in high school biology subjects in Yogyakarta and Central Java provinces] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Yogyakarta State University.
Temiz, B. K., Taşar, M. F., & Tan, M. (2006). Development and validation of a multiple format test of science process skills. International Education Journal, 7(7), 1007-1027.
Tracey, M. W., & Richey, R. C. (2007). ID model construction and validation: A multiple intelligences case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(4), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9015-4