A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Arduino-Based Education in Korean Primary and Secondary Schools in Engineering Education
The Arduino microcontroller enables ordinary people to perform professional tasks that only traditional engineering professionals could perform. Recen.
- Pub. date: October 15, 2020
- Pages: 1503-1512
- 955 Downloads
- 1674 Views
- 6 Citations
The Arduino microcontroller enables ordinary people to perform professional tasks that only traditional engineering professionals could perform. Recently, several educational cases have been applied to primary and secondary schools, which is a desirable attempt to popularize engineering education. This study meta-analyzed the effects of Arduino-based education in primary and secondary schools in Korea from the perspective of engineering education. Accordingly, 16 academic journals and dissertations were selected that verified educational effects by Arduino-based education to primary and secondary students in Korea, and 31 effect sizes were confirmed. According to the results of this study, the overall average effect size was 0.656, which confirmed that Arduino-based education had a positive educational effect. Furthermore, this study calculated the effect size as measured by categorical and continuous variables such as school level, the inclusion of curriculum, giftedness, publication status, the programming language used, publication year, number of sessions, and number of students. Implications were suggested from the perspective of engineering education. This study is meaningful because it suggests the application of Arduino to primary and secondary schools in engineering education by confirming the positive educational effect of Arduino-based education.
Keywords: Arduino-based learning, engineering education, low-cost microcontroller, meta-analysis.
References
Al-Haija, Q. A., Al Tarayrah, M., Al-Qadeeb, H., & Al-Lwaimi, A. (2014). A tiny RSA cryptosystem based on Arduino microcontroller useful for small scale networks. Procedia Computer Science, 34, 639-646.
Armoni, M., Meerbaum-Salant, O., & Ben-Ari, M. (2015). From scratch to "Real" programming. Acm Transactions on Computing Education, 14(4), 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2677087
Arrizabalaga, J. H., Simmons, A. D., & Nollert, M. U. (2017). Fabrication of an economical Arduino-based uniaxial tensile tester. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(4), 530-533. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00639
Avcu, Y. E., & Er, K. O. Design thinking applications in teaching programming to gifted students. Journal of Educational Technology Online Learning, 3(1), 1-30.
Bevan, B. (2017). The promise and the promises of Making in science education. Studies in Science Education, 53(1), 75-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1275380
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Carvalho, P. S., & Hahn, M. (2016). A simple experimental setup for teaching additive colors with Arduino. Physics Teacher, 54(4), 244-245. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4944370
Chacon, R., Codony, D., & Toledo, A. (2017). From physical to digital in structural engineering classrooms using digital fabrication. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(6), 927-937. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21845
Chacon, R., & Oller, S. (2017). Designing experiments using digital fabrication in structural dynamics. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 143(3), 9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ei.1943-5541.0000315
Chacon, R., Posada, H., Toledo, A., & Gouveia, M. (2018). Development of IoT applications in civil engineering classrooms using mobile devices. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(5), 1769-1781. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21985
Chang, C. K., Yang, Y. F., & Tsai, Y. T. (2017). Exploring the engagement effects of visual programming language for data structure courses. Education for Information, 33(3), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-170108
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Earlbam Associates.
D'Ausilio, A. (2012). Arduino: A low-cost multipurpose lab equipment. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 305-313. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0163-z
Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 11-14.
El-Abd, M. (2017). A review of embedded systems education in the Arduino age: Lessons learned and future directions. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 7(2), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v7i2.6845
Escobar, C. P. V., Montenegro, F. M., Gordon, J. L. M., Noboa, H. V., & Vallejo, G. V. (2017). Implementation of a low-cost braille printer prototype, based on free hardware. Revista Publicando, 4(12), 89-107.
Galeriu, C. (2018). An Arduino investigation of Newton's law of cooling. Physics Teacher, 56(9), 618-620. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5080580
Galeriu, C., Edwards, S., & Esper, G. (2014). An Arduino investigation of simple harmonic motion. Physics Teacher, 52(3), 157-159. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4865518
Galeriu, C., Letson, C., & Esper, G. (2015). An Arduino investigation of the RC circuit. Physics Teacher, 53(5), 285-288. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4917435
Godhe, A. L., Lilja, P., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Making sense of making: critical issues in the integration of maker education into schools. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 28(3), 317-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2019.1610040
Goncalves, A. M. B., Freitas, W. P. S., Reis, D. D., Cena, C. R., Alves, D. C. B., & Bozano, D. F. (2019). Surface tension measured with Arduino. Physics Teacher, 57(9), 640-641. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5135800
Hahn, M. D., Cruz, F. A. D., & Carvalho, P. S. (2019). Determining the speed of sound as a function of temperature using Arduino. Physics Teacher, 57(2), 114-115. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.5088475
Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. M. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495-504. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063
Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press.
Hwang, S. (2014). 메타분석의 이해 [Understanding meta-analysis]. Hagjisa.
Istanbullu, A., & Tasci, M. (2019). Open source hardware-Arduino: Case study on mechanical engineering students design project. International Journal of Engineering Education, 35(5), 1326-1335.
Jin, H., Qin, Y. H., Pan, S., Alam, A. U., Dong, S. R., Ghosh, R., & Deen, M. J. (2018). Open-source low-cost wireless potentiometric instrument for PH determination experiments. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(2), 326-330. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00479
Kang, S. J., Yeo, H. W., & Yoon, J. (2019). Applying chemistry knowledge to code, construct, and demonstrate an Arduino-carbon dioxide fountain. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 313-316. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00663
Kim, E., & Yoo, M. (2018). 예술중심 융합인재교육(A-STEAM) 프로그램이 창의성에 미치는 효과에 대한 메타분석[The effects of creativity in A-STEAM education program by meta-analysis]. The Journal of Creativity Education, 18(2), 107-125.
Kim, J. Y., Park, E. M., Park, J. E., Bang, D., Lee, Y. H., & Yoon, H. J. (2015). 통합교육의 효과에 대한 메타분석]A meta-analysis on the effects of integrated education research]. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 403-417.
Kim, M., Jo, H., Wi, S., & Kim, T. (2016). 초 · 중등 교육에서 로봇기반교육 효과에 대한 메타분석 [Meta-analysis on the effects of robot-based education in elementary and secondary education]. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 16(2), 88-107.
Kim, M., & Kim, T. (2016). 기술 중심 융합교육(STEAM) 효과에 대한 메타분석 [Meta-analysis on the effect of convergence education(STEAM) based on technology]. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 22(4), 65-83.
Kim, M., Lee, D., Seo, S., Jeong, Y., & Kim, T. (2016). Meta-analysis on the effect of invention education in elementary and secondary education. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 16(3), 175-195.
Kubinova, S., & Slegr, J. (2015). ChemDuino: Adapting Arduino for low-cost chemical measurements in lecture and laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(10), 1751-1753. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed5008102
Kwon, H., & Lee, D. (2014). 발명교육이 창의성에 미치는 효과에 대한 메타분석 [The effects of invention education on students' creativity: A meta-analysis]. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 20(3), 145-163.
Lee, E. (2020). Developing a low-cost microcontroller–based model for teaching and learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 921-934. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.921
Lee, S., Kim, N., Lee, Y., & Lee, S. (2017). 융합인재교육(STEAM)의 창의성과 문제해결력 효과에 관한 메타분석 [A meta-analysis of the effect for creativity, creative problem solving abilities in STEAM]. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(1), 87-101.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2000). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Litts, B. K., Widman, S. A., Lui, D. A., Walker, J. T., & Kafai, Y. B. (2019). A maker studio model for high school classrooms: The nature and role of critique in an electronic textiles design project. Teachers College Record, 121(9), 34.
Lu, C. C., & Ma, S. Y. (2019). Design STEAM course to train STEAM literacy of primary students: Taking "animal mimicry beast" as an example. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(3), 85-118. https://doi.org/10.6209/jories.201909_64(3).0004
Mercer, C., & Leech, D. (2017). Inexpensive miniature programmable magnetic stirrer from reconfigured computer parts. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(6), 816-818. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00184
Mladenovic, M., Mladenovic, S., & Zanko, Z. (2020). Impact of used programming language for K-12 students' understanding of the loop concept. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtel.2020.10024760
Mladenovic, S., Krpan, D., & Mladenovic, M. (2016). Using games to help novices embrace programming: From elementary to higher education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32(1), 521-531.
Montironi, M. A., Qian, B. S., & Cheng, H. H. (2017). Development and application of the ChArduino toolkit for teaching how to program Arduino boards through the C/C plus plus interpreter Ch. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 25(6), 1053-1065. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21854
Nichols, D. (2017). Arduino-based data acquisition into Excel, LabVIEW, and MATLAB. Physics Teacher, 55(4), 226-227. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4978720
Omar, H. M. (2018). Enhancing automatic control learning through Arduino-based projects. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(5), 652-663. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1390548
Perenc, I., Jaworski, T., & Duch, P. (2019). Teaching programming using dedicated Arduino Educational Board. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(4), 943-954. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22134
Perez, E. S., & Lopez, F. J. (2019). An ultra-low cost line follower robot as educational tool for teaching programming and circuit's foundations. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(2), 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22074
Pino, H., Pastor, V., Grimalt-Alvaro, C., & Lopez, V. (2019). Measuring CO2 with an Arduino: Creating a low-cost, pocket-sized device with flexible applications that yields benefits for students and schools. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(2), 377-381. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00473
Ragazzini, G., Mescola, A., Corsi, L., & Alessandrini, A. (2019). Fabrication of a low-cost on-stage cell incubator with full automation. Journal of Biological Education, 53(2), 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1451772
Rivera-Ortega, U., Martinez-Sisniega, N., & Alcantara-Mendoza, U. (2018). Low-cost educational resource using optical fibers to send 4-bit images in grayscale. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(3), 711-717. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21925
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-641.
Sáez-López, J.-M., Román-González, M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using “Scratch” in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003
Sarao, A., Clocchiatti, M., Barnaba, C., & Zuliani, D. (2016). Using an Arduino seismograph to raise awareness of earthquake hazard through a multidisciplinary approach. Seismological Research Letters, 87(1), 186-192. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150091
Soong, R., Agmata, K., Doyle, T., Jenne, A., Adamo, T., & Simpson, A. (2018). Combining the maker movement with accessibility needs in an undergraduate laboratory: A cost-effective text-to-speech multipurpose, universal chemistry sensor hub (MUCSH) for students with disabilities. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(12), 2268-2272. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00638
Teikari, P., Najjar, R. P., Malkki, H., Knoblauch, K., Dumortier, D., Gronfier, C., & Cooper, H. M. (2012). An inexpensive Arduino-based LED stimulator system for vision research. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 211(2), 227-236.
Topalli, D., & Cagiltay, N. E. (2018). Improving programming skills in engineering education through problem-based game projects with Scratch. Computers & Education, 120, 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.011
Uyanik, I., & Catalbas, B. (2018). A low-cost feedback control systems laboratory setup via Arduino-Simulink interface. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 26(3), 718-726. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.21917
Vu, P., Harshbarger, D., Crow, S., & Henderson, S. (2019). Why STEM? Factors that influence gifted students' choice of college majors. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 3(2), 63-71.
Wong, W. K., Chao, T. K., Chen, P. R., Lien, Y. W., & Wu, C. J. (2015). Pendulum experiments with three modern electronic devices and a modeling tool. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(1), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-015-0026-1
Zhang, J. X., Liu, L., de Pablos, P. O., & She, J. H. (2014). The auxiliary role of information technology in teaching: Enhancing programming course using alice. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(3), 560-565.