Cognitive, Affective, Social and Cultural Aspects of Teaching and Learning in Media Studies
The vision that we will present is not intended to be exhaustive or totalizing, although it does attempt to highlight the most significant aspects tha.
- Pub. date: October 15, 2019
- Pages: 1287-1294
- 1000 Downloads
- 1165 Views
- 4 Citations
The vision that we will present is not intended to be exhaustive or totalizing, although it does attempt to highlight the most significant aspects that characterize it. It is a reflection of more than twenty years of work in the educational field, at different levels and with different functions, it is also the result of personal evolution, and how she will be subject to evolution. Comparing media studies with the 19th century, it seems that media has conquered an essential position in every individual's life. This study meets the requirements of a growing pool of traditional and non-traditional students, including teachers, who find education as an important aspect for jobs in the modern age of information and technology. This research will utilize the literature which has been published already, including quantitative as well as qualitative measures. Past papers were selected, which were published in different areas. Comparing with other empirical research, the first phase of the procedure of the study is to collect the data The study is to identify the teachers and learner's characteristics such as affective, cognitive, and social factors which causes an impact on learning and teaching enhanced environment in media studies.
Keywords: Media studies, cognitive, affective, socio-cultural.
References
Bron, M., Van Gorp, J., & de Rijke, M. (2016). Media studies research in the data‐driven age: How research questions evolve. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(7), 1535-1554.
Brennen, B. S. (2017). Qualitative research methods for media studies. New York, NY: Routledge.
Brown, J. A. (2013). Television', critical viewing skills', education: major media literacy projects in the United States and selected countries. New York, NY: Routledge.
Buckingham D. (2015). Do We Really Need Media Education 2.0? Teaching Media in the Age of Participatory Culture. In T.B. Lin, V. Chen & C. Chai (Eds.), New Media and Learning in the 21st Century. Education Innovation Series. Singapore, Singapore: Springer.
Campbell, R., Martin, C., & Fabos, B. (2018). Media essentials: A brief introduction. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin's.
Casemajor, N. (2015). Digital materialisms: Frameworks for digital media studies. Westminster papers in communication and culture, 10(1), 4-17.
Cui, G., Lockee, B., & Meng, C. (2013). Building modern online social presence: A review of social presence theory and its instructional design implications for future trends. Education and information technologies, 18(4), 661-685.
Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (2014). Bilingualism in education: Aspects of theory, research and practice. New York NY: Routledge.
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gilboa, E., Jumbert, M. G., Miklian, J., & Robinson, P. (2016). Moving media and conflict studies beyond the CNN effect. Review of International Studies, 42(4), 654-672.
Greenfield, P. M. (2014). Mind and media: The effects of television, video games, and computers. Psychology Press. UK.
Grusec, J. E., & Hastings, P. D. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Hall, M., Mazarakis, A., Peters, I., Chorley, M., Caton, S., Mai, J. E., & Strohmaier, M. (2016, May). Following user pathways: Cross platform and mixed methods analysis in social media studies. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 3400-3407). New York, NY: ACM.
Lacey, N. (2017). Media, institutions and audiences: Key concepts in media studies. New York, NY: Palgrave.
Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432-479.
Mayr, P. & Weller, K. (2016). Think before you collect: setting up a data collection approach for social media studies. In L. Sloan, & A. Quan-Haase (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of social media research methods (pp. 107-124). London, UK: SAGE. htpps://doi.org/10.4135/9781473983847
Leung, L. (2013). Generational differences in content generation in social media: The roles of the gratifications sought and of narcissism. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 997-1006.
Li, M. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Game-based learning in science education: A review of relevant research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 877-898.
Marcus, A., Metzger, S., Paxton, R., & Stoddard, J. (2018). Teaching history with film. New York, NY: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351137737
Martin, A. G., & Tyner, K. (2012). Media education, media literacy and digital competence. Comunicar: Revista Cientifica de Comunicacion y Educacion, 19(38), 31-39.
Mezirow, J. (2018). Transformative learning theory. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning (pp. 114-128). New York, NY: Routledge.
Mor, Y., Ferguson, R., & Wasson, B. (2015). Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: A call for action. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 221-229.
Pickering, M. (2015). The devaluation of history in media studies. In M. Conboy & J. Steel (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to British Media History (pp. 9-18). New York, NY: Routledge.
Pimmer, C., Mateescu, M., & Grohbiel, U. (2016). Mobile and ubiquitous learning in higher education settings. A systematic review of empirical studies. Computers in Human Behavior, Volume 63, 490-501.
Pinar, W. F. (2019). Intellectual advancement through disciplinarity: Verticality and horizontality in curriculum studies. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Plantin, J. C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293-310.
Shome, R. (2016). When postcolonial studies meets media studies. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33(3), 245-263.
Stanyer, J., & Mihelj, S. (2016). Taking time seriously? Theorizing and researching change in communication and media studies. Journal of Communication, 66(2), 266-279.
Turkay, S., Hoffman, D., Kinzer, C. K., Chantes, P., & Vicari, C. (2014). Toward understanding the potential of games for learning: Learning theory, game design characteristics, and situating video games in classrooms. Computers in the Schools, 31(1-2), 2-22.
Winch, A., Littler, J., & Keller, J. (2016). Why “intergenerational feminist media studies”? Feminist Media Studies, 16(4), 557-572. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1193285
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2015). Methods of critical discourse studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Zainudin, M., & Istiyono, E. (2019). Scientific approach to promote response fluency viewed from social intelligence: is it effective? European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 801-808. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.801
Zvarych, I., Kalaur, S. M., Prymachenko, N. M., Romashchenko, I. V., & Romanyshyna, O. I. (2019). Gamification as a tool for stimulating the educational activity of students of higher educational institutions of Ukraine and the United States. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 875-891. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.875.