Alvarez, A., & Larrañaga, M. (2016). Experiences incorporating Lego Mindstorms robots in the basic programming syllabus: Lessons learned. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 81(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-015-0202-6

Aminah, N., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Wardono, W., & Cahyono, A. N. (2022). Computational thinking process of prospective mathematics teacher in solving diophantine linear equation problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1495–1507. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1495

Amineh, R. J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Sciences, Literature and Languages, 1(1), 9–16.

Angeli, C. (2022). The effects of scaffolded programming scripts on pre-service teachers’ computational thinking: Developing algorithmic thinking through programming robots. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 31, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100329

Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2020). Developing young children's computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018

Anwar, S., Bascou, N. A., Menekse, M., & Kardgar, A. (2019). A systematic review of studies on educational robotics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 9(2), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1223

Ardito, G., Czerkawski, B., & Scollins, L. (2020). Learning computational thinking together: Effects of gender differences in collaborative middle school robotics program. TechTrends, 64(3), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00461-8

Aristawati, F. A., Budiyanto, C. W., & Ariyuana, R. (2018). Adopting educational robotics to enhance undergraduate students’ self-efficacy levels of computational thinking. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 15(Special Issue), 42–50. https://bit.ly/3c7dzNq

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorenson, C., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to research in education. Cengage Learning.

Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008

Avigad, J. (2018). Modularity in mathematics. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 13(1), 47–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755020317000387

Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006

Bers, M. U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E. R., & Sullivan, A. (2014). Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, 145–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020

Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., & Engelhardt, K. (2016). Developing computational thinking in compulsory education: implications for policy and practice. Publications Office of the European Union.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bravo, F. A., Hurtado, J. A., & González, E. (2021). Using robots with storytelling and drama activities in science education. Education Sciences, 11(7), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070329

Budiyanto, C., Fitriyaningsih, R. N., Kamal, F., Ariyuana, R., & Efendi, A. (2020). Hands-on learning in STEM: Revisiting educational robotics as a learning style precursor. Open Engineering, 10(1), 649–657. https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2020-0071

Budiyanto, C. W., Shahbodin, F., Umam, M. U. K., Isnaini, R., Rahmawati, A., & Widiastuti, I. (2021). Developing computational thinking ability in early childhood education: The impact of Karin programming toy to parent–children engagement. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 5(1), 19–25 https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v5i1.44397

Bybee, R. W. (2019). Using the BSCS 5E instructional model to introduce STEM disciplines. Science and Children, 56(6), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/sc19_056_06_8

Castro, L. M. C., Magana, A. J., Douglas, K. A., & Boutin, M. (2021). Analyzing students’ computational thinking practices in a first-year engineering course. IEEE Access, 9, 33041–33050. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3061277

Chaudhary, V., Agrawal, V., Sureka, P., & Sureka, A. (2016). An experience report on teaching programming and computational thinking to elementary level children using Lego robotics education kit. In V. Kumar, S. Murthy & Kinshuk (Eds.), Proceedings of 2016 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E 2016) (pp. 38-41). IEEE.  https://doi.lorg/10.1109/T4E.2016.016  

Chu, H. -E., Martin, S. N., & Park, J. (2019). A theoretical framework for developing an intercultural STEAM program for Australian and Korean students to enhance science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1251–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9922-y

Daher, W. (2022). Students’ motivation to learn mathematics in the robotics environment. Computers in the Schools, 39, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2022.2071227

Dass, P. M. (2015). Teaching STEM effectively with the learning cycle approach. K-12 STEM Education, 1(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.14456/k12stemed.2015.17

Demetroulis, E. A., & Wallace, M. (2021). Educational robotics as a tool for the development of collaboration skills. In S. Papadakis & M. Kalogiannakis (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Using Educational Robotics to Facilitate Student Learning (pp. 140–163). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6717-3.ch005

Durak, H. Y., Yilmaz, F. G. K., & Yilmaz, R. (2019). Computational thinking, programming self-efficacy, problem solving and experiences in the programming process conducted with robotic activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(2), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.554493

Eguchi, A. (2016). RoboCupJunior for promoting STEM education, 21st century skills, and technological advancement through robotics competition. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 692–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.05.013

El-Hamamsy, L., Bruno, B., Chessel-Lazzarotto, F., Chevalier, M., Roy, D., Zufferey, J. D., & Mondada, F. (2021). The symbiotic relationship between educational robotics and computer science in formal education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(5), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10494-3

Elkin, M., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2014). Implementing a robotics curriculum in an early childhood Montessori classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 13(1), 153-169. https://doi.org/10.28945/2094

Falloon, G. (2016). An analysis of young students' thinking when completing basic coding tasks using Scratch Jnr. On the iPad. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(6), 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12155

Fidai, A., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2020). “Scratch”-ing computational thinking with Arduino: A meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100726

Fry, M., Curtis, K., Considine, J., & Shaban, R. Z. (2017). Using observation to collect data in emergency research. Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal, 20(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aenj.2017.01.001

Gülhan, F., & Şahin, F. (2018). Activity implementation intended for STEAM (STEM+ Art) education: Mirrors and light. Journal of Inquiry Based Activities, 8(2), 111–126. https://www.ated.info.tr/ojs-3.2.1-3/index.php/ated/article/view/29

Hamilton, M., Clarke-Midura, J., Shumway, J. F., & Lee, V. R. (2020). An emerging technology report on computational toys in early childhood. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09423-8

Hamzeh, F., Theokaris, C., Rouhana, C., & Abbas, Y. (2017). Application of hands-on simulation games to improve classroom experience. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(5), 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1190688

Holbrook, J., Rannikmäe, M., & Soobard, R. (2020). STEAM Education—A Transdisciplinary Teaching and Learning Approach. In B. Akpan & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science Education in Theory and Practice (pp. 465–477). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_31

Ibrahim, M. F., Huddin, A. B., Hashim, F. H., Abdullah, M., Rahni, A. A. A., Mustaza, S. M., Hussain, A., & Zaman, M. H. M. (2020). Strengthening programming skills among engineering students through experiential learning based robotics project. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 939–946. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20653

Ioannou, A., & Makridou, E. (2018). Exploring the potentials of educational robotics in the development of computational thinking: A summary of current research and practical proposal for future work. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2531–2544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9729-z

Jaipal-Jamani, K., & Angeli, C. (2017). Effect of robotics on elementary preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, science learning, and computational thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(2), 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9663-z

Jentoft, N., & Olsen, T. S. (2019). Against the flow in data collection: How data triangulation combined with a ‘slow’ interview technique enriches data. Qualitative Social Work, 18(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017712581

Jung, S. E., & Won, E.-S. (2018). Systematic review of research trends in robotics education for young children. Sustainability, 10(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040905

Jurado, E., Fonseca, D., Coderch, J., & Canaleta, X. (2020). Social STEAM learning at an early age with robotic platforms: A case study in four schools in Spain. Sensors, 20(13), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20133698

Kale, U., & Yuan, J. (2021). Still a new kid on the block? Computational thinking as problem solving in Code.org. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(4), 620–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120972050

Kandlhofer, M., & Steinbauer, G. (2016). Evaluating the impact of educational robotics on pupils’ technical- and social-skills and science related attitudes. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75, 679–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.09.007

Kong, S.-C., Lai, M., & Sun, D. (2020). Teacher development in computational thinking: Design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 151, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872

Kopcha, T., McGregor, J., Shin, S., Qian, Y., Choi, J., Hill, R., Mativo, J., & Choi, I. (2017). Developing an integrative STEM curriculum for robotics education through educational design research. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 1(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-017-0005-1

Korkmaz, Ö. (2016). The effect of Lego Mindstorms Ev3 based design activities on students’ attitudes towards learning computer programming, self-efficacy beliefs and levels of academic achievement. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4(4), 647-660. https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2016.4.4.24

Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Namukasa, I. K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu, C. (2017). A pedagogical framework for computational thinking. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 154–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-017-0031-2

Kucuk, S., & Sisman, B. (2020). Students’ attitudes towards robotics and STEM: Differences based on gender and robotics experience. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 23-24, Article 100167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2020.100167

Lee, K. T., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). Collaboration by design: Using robotics to foster social interaction in kindergarten. Computers in the Schools, 30(3), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2013.805676

Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020). Computational thinking is more about thinking than computing. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00030-2

Looi, C.-K., How, M. -L., Longkai, W., Seow, P., & Liu, L. (2018). Analysis of linkages between an unplugged activity and the development of computational thinking. Computer Science Education, 28(3), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1533297

Lopez-Caudana, E., Ramirez-Montoya, M. S., Martínez-Pérez, S., & Rodríguez-Abitia, G. (2020). Using robotics to enhance active learning in mathematics: A multi-scenario study. Mathematics, 8(12), 2163. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8122163

Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step Guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 3351–3354. https://bit.ly/3d6leeN  

Manikutty, G. (2021). My Robot can tell stories: Introducing robotics and physical computing to children using dynamic dioaramas. In Proceedings of 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-9). IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE49875.2021.9637460

Montiel, H., & Gomez-Zermeño, M. G. (2021). Educational challenges for computational thinking in K–12 education: A systematic literature review of “Scratch” as an innovative programming tool. Computers, 10(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers10060069

Morgan, K., Barker, B., Nugent, G., & Grandgenett, N. (2019). Educational robotics as a tool for youth leadership development and STEM engagement. In A. Sahin & M. J. Mohr-Schroeder (Eds.), STEM Education 2.0 (pp. 248–275). Brill Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004405400_014

Nasir, J., Norman, U., Bruno, B., & Dillenbourg, P. (2020). When positive perception of the robot has no effect on learning. In Proceedings of the 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN2020) (pp. 313–320). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223343

Negrini, L., & Giang, C. (2019). How do pupils perceive educational robotics as a tool to improve their 21st century skills? Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(2), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1628

Nemiro, J. E. (2021). Building collaboration skills in 4th-to 6th-grade students through robotics. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 35(3), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2020.1721621

Ohnishi, Y., Honda, K., Nishioka, R., Mori, S., & Kawada, K. (2017). Robotics programming learning for elementary and junior high school students. Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 29(6), 992–998. https://doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2017.p0992

Omotayo, S. A., & Adeleke, J. O. (2017). The 5E instructional model: A constructivism approach to enhancing students' learning outcomes in mathematics. Journal of the International Society of Teacher Education, 21(2), 15–26.

Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2021). Attitudes towards the use of educational robotics: Exploring pre-service and in-service early childhood teacher profiles. Education Sciences, 11(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050204

Papadakis, S., Vaiopoulou, J., Sifaki, E., Stamovlasis, D., Kalogiannakis, M., & Vassilakis, K. (2021). Factors that hinder in-service teachers from incorporating educational robotics into their daily or future teaching practice. In B. Csapó & J. Uhomoibhi (Eds.), Proceeding of the 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (Vol.2, pp. 55–63). SCITEPRESS. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010413900550063  

Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child (M. Cook, Trans.). Basic Books. https://doi.org/10.1037/11168-000

Saxena, A., Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Wong, G. K. W. (2020). Designing unplugged and plugged activities to cultivate computational thinking: An exploratory study in early childhood education. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00478-w

Selby, N. S., Ng, J., Stump, G. S., Westerman, G., Traweek, C., & Asada, H. H. (2021). TeachBot: Towards teaching robotics fundamentals for human-robot collaboration at work. Heliyon, 7(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07583

Sentance, S., & Csizmadia, A. (2017). Computing in the curriculum: Challenges and strategies from a teacher’s perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 469–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016-9482-0

Shen, J., Chen, G., Barth-Cohen, L., Jiang, S., & Eltoukhy, M. (2020). Connecting computational thinking in everyday reasoning and programming for elementary school students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1834474

Shute, V. J., Sun, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2017). Demystifying computational thinking. Educational Research Review, 22, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.003

Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268322

Solomon, C. J., & Papert, S. (1976). A case study of a young child doing turtle graphics in LOGO. In Proceedings of the 1976 National Computer Conference and Exposition (AFIPS '76) (pp. 1049–1056). AFIPS Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/1499799.1499945  

Sun, L., Hu, L., Yang, W., Zhou, D., & Wang, X. (2021). STEM learning attitude predicts computational thinking skills among primary school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(2), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12493

Tsakeni, M. (2021). Preservice teachers’ use of computational thinking to facilitate inquiry-based practical work in multiple-deprived classrooms. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9574

Vanmassenhove, E., Shterionov, D., & Way, A. (2019). Lost in translation: Loss and decay of linguistic richness in machine translation. In M. Forcada, A. Way, B. Haddow & R. Sennrich (Eds.), Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit XVII: Research Track (pp. 222–232). European Association for Machine Translation. https://aclanthology.org/W19-6622/

Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Yadav, A., Hong, H., & Stephenson, C. (2016). Computational thinking for all: Pedagogical approaches to embedding 21st century problem solving in K-12 classrooms. TechTrends, 60(6), 565–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0087-7

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and method. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Zhang, D. (2021). STEM education through making: What are affordances and challenges of making out of school club? Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9(9), 572–583. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.99042

Zhang, Y., Luo, R., Zhu, Y., & Yin, Y. (2021). Educational robots improve K-12 students’ computational thinking and STEM attitudes: Systematic review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(7), 1450–1481. https://doi.org/10.1177/073563312199407