Development of Web-based Application for Teacher Candidate Competence Instruments: Preparing Professional Teachers in the IR 4.0 Era
Badrun Kartowagiran
,
Suyanta Suyanta
,
Syukrul Hamdi
,
Amat Jaedun
,
Ahman
,
Rusijono Rusijono
,
Lukman A.R. Laliyo
This research aimed to develop a web-based application for teacher candidate competence instruments to prepare professional teachers in the Industrial.
- Pub. date: October 15, 2020
- Pages: 1749-1763
- 887 Downloads
- 1354 Views
- 4 Citations
This research aimed to develop a web-based application for teacher candidate competence instruments to prepare professional teachers in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 (IR 4.0) era. Teacher candidate competencies consist of pedagogical, professional, social, and personality competences. This is a research and development with 8 stages, involving the development of instrument grids/ construct, focus group discussions, instrument item development, instrument validation, manual instrument testing, application development, application assessment by experts, application trial, and final revision of the application. The initial focus group discussions involved 9 experts, while the instrument validation involved 35 experts consisting of 21 experts for pedagogical and professional competences, 7 experts for social competences, 7 experts for the personality competences, and 4 media experts. The trial involved a total of 107 Mathematics, Indonesian, and English student teacher candidates. Expert validation was analyzed using the Aiken formula; application effectiveness and readability were described based on expert judgment, and discrimination tests on the results of social and personality competence tests between the study programs used the Multivariate Analysis of Variants. The results showed that there were no differences in social and personality competences between Mathematics, Indonesian, and English prospective teachers. The developed instruments for pedagogical, professional, personality, and social competences were deemed valid. The application has met the readability aspect and is scored well by experts with an average assessment rating of .78. These results suggest that the application can be used by the government as a solution to assess teacher candidate competences in the IR 4.0 era.
Keywords: Instrument application IR 4.0, pedagogy, professional, social, personality.
References
Adnan, Suwandi, S., Nurkamto, J., & Setiawan, B. (2019). Teacher competence in authentic and integrative assessment in Indonesian language learning. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 701-716.
Ajmain, T., Nurul, A., Rahman, S., & Mohamad, A. (2019). Industrial revolution 4.0: Innovation and challenges of Islamic education teachers in teaching. BITARA International Journal of Civilizational Studies and Human Sciences, 2(1), 38-47.
Anagun, S. S. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of the relationship between 21st-century skills and managing constructivist learning environments. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 825-840.
Aoun, J. E. (2017). Robot-proof: Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. The MIT Press.
Arisman, A., Getteng, A. R., & Nuryamin, N. (2018). Pengaruh kompetensi kepribadian guru terhadap motivasi belajar peserta didik MTSn 2 Bone Kabupaten Bone [The influence of teacher personality competencies on learning motivation of MTSn 2 Bone students]. Journal of Islamic Discourse /Jurnal Diskursus Islam, 6(3), 418-443
Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). AMOS user's guide. Version 3.6. Smallwaters.
Batubara, D. S. (2018). Kompetensi teknologi informasi dan komunikasi guru SD/MI (potret, faktor-faktor, dan upaya meningkatkannya) [Information and communication technology competencies of Elementary schools / Islamic Elementary Schools teachers (portraits, factors, and efforts to improve it)]. Muallimuna: Journal of Islamic Elementary Schools/Muallimuna: Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 3(1), 48-65.
Boucher, M. D. (2012). Social competence education for pre-service teachers [Unpublished master's thesis]. California State University
Brajcic, M., Kuscevic, D., & Lazeta, M. (2020). A Comparison between the competencies of teachers and students of teacher education in recognizing artistically gifted students. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1327-1336. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1327
Chai, C. S., Hwee Ling Koh, J., & Teo, Y. H. (2019). Enhancing and modeling teachers’ design beliefs and efficacy of technological pedagogical content knowledge for 21st-century quality learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 360-384.
Chou, C. M., Shen, C. H., Hsiao, H. C., & Shen, T. C. (2018). Industry 4.0 manpower and its teaching connotation in technical and vocational education: Adjust 107 curriculum reform. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 5(1), 9-14.
Cramer, D. (2003). Advanced quantitative data analysis. McGraw-Hill Education.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: alternative approach and practical guidelines. Pearson Education.
Friedlander, E. W., Arshan, N., Zhou, S., & Goldenberg, C. (2019). Lifewide or school-only learning: approaches to addressing the developing world’s learning crisis. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 333-367.
Ghorbani, S., Jafari, S. E. M., & Sharifian, F. (2018). Learning to be: Teachers’ competences and practical solutions: A step towards sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 20-45.
Gilroy, P. (2018). Perspectives on evidence-based knowledge for teachers: acquisition, mobilisation and utilisation. Journal of Education for Teaching, 44(5), 524-538.
Gleason, N.W. (Ed.). (2018). Higher education in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. Springer.
Hendryadi, & Suryani. (2014). Structural equation modeling dengan lisrel 8.80: Pedoman untuk pemula [Structural equation modeling with lisrel 8.80: Guide for beginners]. Kaukaba Dipantara.
Idrissi, M. K., Hnida, M., & Bennani, S. (2020). Competency-based assessment: from conceptual model to an operational tool. In Khosrow, P.M., Clarke, S., Jennex, M.E., & Anttiroiko, A.V. Learning and Performance Assessment: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, (pp. 108-129). IGI Global.
Ismail, S. N., Don, Y., Husin, F., & Khalid, R. (2018). Instructional leadership and teachers' functional competency across the 21st-century learning. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 135-152
Jones, A. (2018). Vocational education for the twenty-first century. Melbourne centre for the study of higher education https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/2845775/Final-Anne-Jones-paper1.pdf
Jusuf, R., Sopandi, W., Wulan, A. R., & Sa’ud, U. S. (2019). Strengthening teacher competency through the ICARE approach to improve literacy assessment of science creative thinking. International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research, 18(7), 70-83.
Kusumawadhani, P. N. (2017). Does the teacher certification program lead to better quality teachers? Evidence from Indonesia. Education Economic, 25(6), 590-618
Leonard, L. (2016). Kompetensi tenaga pendidik di Indonesia: Analisis dampak rendahnya kualitas SDM guru dan solusi perbaikannya [Teacher competency in Indonesia: Analysis of the impact of the low quality of teacher human resources and solutions for improvement]. Formative: Scientific Journal of Mathematics and Natural Sciences Education /Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 5(3).192-201
Mardapi, D. (2018). Peran evaluasi dalam meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan kejuruan. Pidato Pelepasan Guru Besar Universtitas Negeri Yogyakarta [The role of evaluation in improving the quality of vocational education. Speech Release of Professor of Yogyakarta State University]. Yogyakarta State University.
Mertens, D. M. (2014). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.
Muharram, M., Agung, M., Ganefri, G., Ponto, H., Sila, I. N., Suyanta, Mulbar, U., Wahid, A., & Parenreng, J. M. (2020). Pengembangan aplikasi system online rekrutmen mahasiswa calon guru Indonesia [Development of online student recruitment system application for prospective Indonesian teachers]. Journal of Innovation and Technology (INNOVTEC) Polbeng-Informatics Series/ Journal Inovasi dan Teknologi (INOVTEK) Polbeng – Seri Informatika, 5(1), 31-45.
Musfah, J. (2012). Peningkatan kompetensi guru melalui pelatihan dan sumber belajar: teori dan praktik [Teacher competency enhancement through training and learning resources: theory and practice]. Kencana.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results in focus. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-Indonesia.pdf
Panggabean, M. S., & Himawan, K. K. (2016). The development of the Indonesian teacher competence questionnaire. Journal of Educational, Health, and Community Psychology, 5(2), 1-15.
Popkova, E. G., Ragulina, Y. V., & Bogovic, A. V. (Eds). (2018). Industry 4.0: Industrial revolution of the 21st century. Springer
Pressman, R. S. (2005). Software engineering: a practitioner’s approach. Palgrave MacMillan.
Saputro, A. D., Atun, S., Wilujeng, I., Ariyanto, A., & Arifin, S. (2020). Enhancing pre-service elementary teachers’ self-efficacy and critical thinking using problem-based learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 765-773. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.765
Stephens, M., Landeros, K., Perkins, R., & Tang, J. H. (2016). Highlights from TIMSS and TIMSS advanced 2015: mathematics and science achievement of us students in grades 4 and 8 and advanced courses at the end of high school in an international context. National Center for Education Statistics.
Stiggins, R. J (2011). An introduction to student involved assessment for learning (2nd ed.). Addison Wesley.
Tican, C., & Deniz, S. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ opinions about the use of 21st-century learner and 21st-century teacher skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 181-197.
Tobajas, M., Molina, C. B., Quintanilla, A., Alonso-Morales, N., & Casas, J. A. (2019). Development and application of scoring rubrics for evaluating students’ competencies and learning outcomes in chemical engineering experimental courses. Education for Chemical Engineers, 26, 80-88.
Van Hong, B., Tuyen, T., & Luong, N. T. (2018). Teaching capacity of technology teachers: Applying in the training program of technology teachers in Vietnam. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(12), 1662-1667.