Didactic Oriented Study: Move and Transitivity Analysis of Method, Result, and Discussion Sections in Research Articles
Wawan Hendrawan
,
Eva Tuckyta Sari Sujatna
,
Ekaning Krisnawati
,
Nani Darmayanti
This study expounds how the analysis of move and transitivity in the method, result, and discussion sections contributes to the advancement of novice .
- Pub. date: July 15, 2022
- Pages: 1259-1272
- 543 Downloads
- 1047 Views
- 2 Citations
This study expounds how the analysis of move and transitivity in the method, result, and discussion sections contributes to the advancement of novice writers’ writing skills by providing a writing pattern applied when composing research articles. To this aim, a qualitative approach with descriptive technique is employed to encapsulate and explain the phenomena being studied. The data are the method, result, and discussion sections of research articles (RAs) drawn from top tier journals categorized as language and linguistics and analyzed based on macro structure (move and steps) and micro structure (transitivity). The results indicate that 11 moves and 38 steps discovered, in detail, these consist of three moves and 15 steps in method, four moves and 10 steps in result, and four moves and 13 steps in discussion. As for the successions of the move steps, few inter-move step shifts observed. This is in contrast with the outer-move step shifts that commonly occurred. Meanwhile, the outcomes of the transitivity analysis suggest that there are six processes revealed including material, relational, verbal, mental, existential, and behavioral consecutively with material dominating and behavioral the fewest. The results of the present study may supplement the teaching materials reside in English for a research purpose.
didactic oriented study method result and discussion sections move research article transitivity
Keywords: Didactic oriented study, method, result and discussion sections, move, research article, transitivity.
References
Aston, G. (1997). Small and large corpora in language learning. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, & J. P. Melia (Eds.), Practical applications in language corpora (pp. 51-62). Lodz University Press.
Basturkmen, H. (2009). Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in language teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(4), 241-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.07.001
Behnam, B., & Zamanian, J. (2013). Genre analysis of Oxford and Tabriz applied linguistics research article abstracts: From move structure to transitivity analysis. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 6(12), 41-59. https://bit.ly/3tUY7Zv
Bice, K., & Kroll, J. F. (2019). English only? Monolinguals in linguistically diverse contexts have an edge in language learning. Brain and Language, 196, 104644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104644
Bower, K. (2019). School leaders’ perspectives on content and language integrated learning in England. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33(4), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2019.1667367
Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2015). Furthering and applying move/step constructs: Technology-driven marshalling of Swalesian genre theory for EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 52-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.004
Cotos, E., Huffman, S., & Link, S. (2017). A move/step model for methods sections: Demonstrating rigour and credibility. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.01.001
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publication.
Crombie, W., & Rika-Heke, P. (1991). ESP: Fact or fiction? Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 4, 25-36. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.1991.4.03
Dobakhti, L. (2016). A genre analysis of discussion sections of qualitative research articles in applied linguistics. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(7), 1383-1389. http://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0607.08
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed). Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. The Palmer Press.
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00038-5
Huang, P. (2009). A comparison of international and Chinese journal article abstracts: From move structure to transitivity analysis. Linguistics Journal, 4(1), 23-45. https://bit.ly/3whmdQQ
Jones, S., & Brandt, S. (2019). Do children really acquire dense neighbourhoods? Journal of Child Language, 46(6), 1260 - 1273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000473
Kaiser, E. (2019). Linguistic consequences of event segmentation in visual narratives: Implications for prominence. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(3), 402 - 408. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1667000
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
Kim, L. C., Evans, M. S., Odacioglu, M. C., & Köktürk, S. (2016). A contrastive genre-based study: English and Malay. Humanities and Social Sciences Review, 05(01), 437–444. https://bit.ly/34H2K0z
Lim, J. M. H. (2006). Method sections of management research articles: A pedagogically motivated qualitative study. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 282-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.07.001
Lim, J. M. H. (2010). Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and education: A comparative genre-based investigation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 280-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.10.001
Lin, L., & Evans, S. (2012). Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2011.10.002
Liu, Y., & Buckingham, L. (2018). The schematic structure of discussion sections in applied linguistics and the distribution of metadiscourse markers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 34, 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.04.002
Martínez, I. (2001). Impersonality in the research article as revealed by analysis of the transitivity structure. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 227-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00013-2
Maswana, S., Kanamaru, T., & Tanjino, A. (2015). Move analysis of research articles across five engineering fields: What they share and what they do not. Ampersand, 2, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2014.12.002
Nguyen, L. T. T., & Pramoolsook, I. (2015). Move analysis of results-discussion chapters in TESOL master’s theses written by Vietnamese students. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 21(2), 1 – 15. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2015-2102-01
Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4
Pang, J., & Chen, M. (2007). Transitivity in research articles and the realization of communicative aims: A genre analysis perspective. Journal of Foreign Languages, 5, 16-22. https://bit.ly/3whtlwM
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479-497. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00050-7
Pho, P. D. (2008). How can learning about the structure of research articles help international students? In T. McGrath (Ed.), 19th ISANA International education association conference proceedings (pp. 1 - 11). ISANA International Education Association. https://bit.ly/3JpIP5i
Pramoolsook, I., Li, Q., & Wang, S. (2015). The methods sections in management and marketing research articles: Rhetorical variations between two sub-disciplines of business. International E-Journal of Advances in Social Sciences, 1(2), 294-300. https://bit.ly/360hb0C
Robey, A. (2019). The benefits of testing: Individual differences based on student factors. Journal of Memory and Language, 108, 1 - 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104029
Scimago Journal & Country Rank. (2019). Language and Linguistics. https://bit.ly/3q1KxCf
Soodmand Afshar, H., Doosti, M., & Movassagh, H. (2018). A comparative study of generic structure of applied linguistics and chemistry research articles: The case of discussions. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 28-56. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2018.13404
Stoller, F. L., & Robinson, M. S. (2013). Chemistry journal articles: An interdisciplinary approach to move analysis with pedagogical aims. English for Specific Purposes, 32, 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.09.001
Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of article introductions (Michigan classics ed.). Language Studies Unit at the University of Aston.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524827
Tessuto, G. (2015). Generic structure and rhetorical moves in English-language empirical law research articles: Sites of interdisciplinary and interdiscursive cross-over. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 13-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.002
Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar (3rd ed.) Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203785270
Tribble, C. (1997). Improvising corpora for ELT: Quick and dirty ways of developing corpora for language teaching. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, & P. J. Melia (Eds.), Practical applications in language corpora (pp. 106-118). Lodz University Press.
Vathanalaoha, K. (2017). Genre analysis and transitivity analysis of dental research article abstracts: Thai and international journals [Doctoral dissertation, Thammasat University]. Thammasat University Digital Archive. https://bit.ly/36jeM0P
Vathanalaoha, K., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2018). Transitivity analysis of rhetorical moves in dental research article abstracts: Thai and international journals. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 18(3), 639-662. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-01
Zheng, S., Yang, A., & Ge, G. (2014). Functional stylistic analysis: Transitivity in English-medium medical research articles. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 12-25. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n2p12