Enhancing Student Performance during Online Learning with Psychosocial Processes and Information and Communication Technology Competence: The Role of Psychological Engagement as Mediator
Muhamad Uyun , Yuli Bahriah , Zulhijra , Ike Utia Ningsih , Fitriani
Some Indonesians may still regard online education as a novel, although they frequently engage in online-related activities without even realizing it..
- Pub. date: July 15, 2023
- Pages: 1509-1522
- 969 Downloads
- 1120 Views
- 0 Citations
Some Indonesians may still regard online education as a novel, although they frequently engage in online-related activities without even realizing it. The quality of learning, satisfaction, achievement, retention, and, more broadly, personal growth are all favorably correlated with student engagement. For students to provide their best effort and succeed in online learning, it is crucial to have good psychological engagement in them. This engagement will help their psychological processes and dispositions to improve. The quantitative research methodology was utilized in this research. In addition, 800 high school students from South Sumatra participated in this research as a sample. The structural equation model is analyzed (SEM). The findings indicated that 85.9 percent of the time, a psychological commitment is influenced by information communications technology (ICT) proficiency, psychosocial processes, and student performance. Thus, the value of .713 indicates that psychological involvement, psychosocial processes, and ICT proficiency all impact student performance. This study demonstrates that every hypothesis has a favorable and significant impact. These circumstances suggest that students who are proficient in ICT and psychosocial processes will be able to enhance their performance through challenging and dry learning. The interaction between students while learning strengthens this condition.
ict competence online learning psychological engagement psychosocial processes student performance
Keywords: ICT competence, online learning, psychological engagement, psychosocial processes, student performance.
References
Al-Kumaim, N. H., Alhazmi, A. K., Mohammed, F., Gazem, N. A., Shabbir, M. S., & Fazea, Y. (2021). Exploring the impact of the covid-19 pandemic on university students’ learning life: An integrated conceptual motivational model for sustainable and healthy online learning. Sustainability, 13(5), Article 2546. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052546
Alenizi, M. A. K. (2019). Effectiveness of a program based on a multi-sensory strategy in developing visual perception of primary school learners with learning disabilities: A contextual study of Arabic learners. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(1), 72–104. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2019.3346
Altinyelken, H. K., Hoek, L., & Jiang, L. (2020). Improving the psychosocial wellbeing of international students: The relevance of mindfulness. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 48(4), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2019.1600189
Amriza, R. N. S., Saintika, Y., & Firmansyah, A. Y. (2022). The investigation of student engagement as mediator in ICT readiness and experience on e-learning effectiveness in post-pandemic recovery. In International Conference on ICT for Smart Society (ICISS) (pp. 1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICISS55894.2022.9915172
Archbell, K. A., Coplan, R. J., Nocita, G., & Rose-Krasnor, L. (2019). Participation in structured performing arts activities in early to middle childhood: Psychological engagement, stress, and links with socioemotional functioning. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 65(3), 329–355. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.65.3.0329
Areepattamannil, S., & Santos, I. M. (2019). Adolescent students’ perceived information and communication technology (ICT) competence and autonomy: Examining links to dispositions toward science in 42 countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 98, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.005
Austin, Z., & Gregory, P. (2020). Understanding psychological engagement and flow in community pharmacy practice. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 16(4), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SAPHARM.2019.06.013
Barratt, J. M., & Duran, F. (2021). Does psychological capital and social support impact engagement and burnout in online distance learning students? The Internet and Higher Education, 51, Article 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100821
Berndt, A. E. (2020). Sampling methods. Journal of Human Lactation, 36(2), 224-226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420906850
Carmona-Halty, M., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Linking positive emotions and academic performance: The mediated role of academic psychological capital and academic engagement. Current Psychology, 40, 2938–2947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00227-8
Cassia, A. R., Costa, I., da Silva, V. H. C., & de Oliveira Neto, G. C. (2020). Systematic literature review for the development of a conceptual model on the relationship between knowledge sharing, information technology infrastructure and innovative capability. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(7), 801–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1714026
Chisadza, C., Clance, M., Mthembu, T., Nicholls, N., & Yitbarek, E. (2021). Online and face-to-face learning: Evidence from students’ performance during the Covid-19 pandemic. African Development Review, 33(S1), S114–S125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12520
Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(S1), S14–S30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998
Choi, J. R., Straubhaar, J., Skouras, M., Park, S., Santillana, M., & Strover, S. (2021). Techno-capital: Theorizing media and information literacy through information technology capabilities. New Media & Society, 23(7), 1989–2011. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820925800
Cobo‐Rendón, R., Pérez‐Villalobos, M. V., Páez‐Rovira, D., & Gracia‐Leiva, M. (2020). A longitudinal study: Affective well-being, psychological well-being, self‐efficacy and academic performance among first‐year undergraduate students. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(4), 518–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12618
Durón-Ramos, M., Perez, M., & Chacón-Andrade, E. R. (2022). Orientations to happiness and university students’ engagement during the COVID-19 Era: Evidence from Six American Countries. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 11(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.9198
Ekpenyong, J. A., Owan, V. J., Mbon, U. F., & Undie, S. B. (2023). Family and community inputs as predictors of students’ overall, cognitive, affective and psychomotor learning outcomes in secondary schools. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(1), 103-127. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202319099
Elfaki, N. K., Abdulraheem, I., & Abdulrahim, R. (2019). Impact of e-learning vs traditional learning on students’ performance and attitude. International Medical Journal, 8(10), 76–82. https://bit.ly/3ZTRIeS
Engin, G. (2020). An examination of primary school students’ academic achievements and motivation in terms of parents’ attitudes, teacher motivation, teacher self-efficacy and leadership approach. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(1), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.228.18
Enneking, K. M., Breitenstein, G. R., Coleman, A. F., Reeves, J. H., Wang, Y., & Grove, N. P. (2019). The evaluation of a hybrid, general chemistry laboratory curriculum: Impact on students’ cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(6), 1058–1067. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00637
Fang, F. C., Benson, C. A., Del Rio, C., Edwards, K. M., Fowler, V. G., Fredricks, D. N., Limaye, A. P., Murray, B. E., Naggie, S., Pappas, P. G., Patel, R., Paterson, D. L., Pegues, D. A., Petri, W. A., & Schooley, R. T. (2021). Covid-19-Lessons Learned and Questions Remaining. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 72(12), 2225–2240. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1654
Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: A window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Article 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x
Fasey, K. J., Sarkar, M., Wagstaff, C. R. D., & Johnston, J. (2022). Understanding organizational resilience in elite sport: An exploration of psychosocial processes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 62, Article 102236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102236
Granić, A. (2022). Enhancing online participation in education: Quarter century of research. Journal of Computers in Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-022-00238-8
Guitert, M., Romeu, T., & Baztán, P. (2021). The digital competence framework for primary and secondary schools in Europe. European Journal of Education, 56, 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12430
Guzal, N. (2022). Pedagogical-Psychological Aspects of the Formation of Social Consciousness in Preschool Children. Yosh Tadqiqotchi Jurnali, 1(5), 40–46. http://bit.ly/3GuKuHC
Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Learner engagement in blended learning environments: A conceptual framework. Online Learning, 23(2), 145–178. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481
Hempel, B., Kiehlbaugh, K., & Blowers, P. (2020). Scalable and practical teaching practices faculty can deploy to increase retention: A faculty cookbook for increasing student success. Education for Chemical Engineers, 33, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.07.004
Kent, F., Glass, S., Courtney, J., Thorpe, J., & Nisbet, G. (2020). Sustainable interprofessional learning on clinical placements: The value of observing others at work. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 34(6), 812–818. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1702932
Kim, J. (2020). Learning and teaching online during Covid-19: Experiences of student teachers in an early childhood education practicum. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52, 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-020-00272-6
Kurtovic, A., Vrdoljak, G., & Idzanovic, A. (2019). Predicting procrastination: The role of academic achievement, self-efficacy and perfectionism. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 8(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2019.2993
Le, V. T., Nguyen, N. H., Tran, T. L. N., Nguyen, L. T., Nguyen, T. A., & Nguyen, M. T. (2022). The interaction patterns of pandemic-initiated online teaching: How teachers adapted. System, 105, Article 102755. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SYSTEM.2022.102755
Lidyasari, A. T., Rachmawati, I., da Costa, A., & Wanyi, P. (2022). How are the Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Levels of Primary School Learners Living in Suburban Area of Yogyakarta based on Career Development? Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 10(2), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v10i2.48061
Ma, Y., & Qin, X. (2021). Measurement invariance of information, communication and technology (ICT) engagement and its relationship with student academic literacy: Evidence from PISA 2018. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, Article 100982. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2021.100982
Mackolil, J., & Mackolil, J. (2020). Addressing psychosocial problems associated with the COVID-19 lockdown. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 51, Article 102156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102156
Meng, L., Qiu, C., & Boyd-Wilson, B. (2019). Measurement invariance of the ICT engagement construct and its association with students’ performance in China and Germany: Evidence from PISA 2015 data. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3233–3251. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12729
Möller, S. P., Apputhurai, P., Tye-Din, J. A., & Knowles, S. R. (2021). Quality of life in coeliac disease: Relationship between psychosocial processes and quality of life in a sample of 1697 adults living with coeliac disease. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 151, Article 110652. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPSYCHORES.2021.110652
Muenks, K., Canning, E. A., LaCosse, J., Green, D. J., Zirkel, S., Garcia, J. A., & Murphy, M. C. (2020). Does my professor think my ability can change? Students’ perceptions of their STEM professors’ mindset beliefs predict their psychological vulnerability, engagement, and performance in class. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(11), 2119-2144. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/xge0000763
Oralbekova, A., Begalieva, S., Ortaeva, A., Magauova, A., & Suleimen, M. (2021). Teachers’ readiness to use ICT in the conditions of inclusive education. E3S Web of Conferences, 258, Article 7021. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125807021
Palacios-Barrios, E. E., & Hanson, J. L. (2019). Poverty and self-regulation: Connecting psychosocial processes, neurobiology, and the risk for psychopathology. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 90, 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.12.012
Park, M., & Son, J.-B. (2022). Pre-service EFL teachers’ readiness in computer-assisted language learning and teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1815649
Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0136-3
Pischetola, M. (2022). Exploring the relationship between in-service teachers’ beliefs and technology adoption in Brazilian primary schools. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09610-0
Rasmitadila, Widyasari, Prasetyo, T., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., & Aliyyah, R. R. (2021). General teachers’ experience of the brain’s natural learning systems-based instructional approach in inclusive classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1436a
Ratanasiripong, P., Wang, C. D. C., Ratanasiripong, N., Hanklang, S., Kathalae, D., & Chumchai, P. (2022). Impact of psychosocial factors on academic performance of nursing students in Thailand. Journal of Health Research, 36(4), 598–606. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHR-07-2020-0242
Raza, S. A., Qazi, W., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2021). The influence of psychological, motivational, and behavioral factors on university students’ achievements: The mediating effect of academic adjustment. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(3), 849–870. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2020-0065
Realyvásquez-Vargas, A., Maldonado-Macías, A. A., Arredondo-Soto, K. C., Baez-Lopez, Y., Carrillo-Gutiérrez, T., & Hernández-Escobedo, G. (2020). The impact of environmental factors on academic performance of university students taking online classes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico. Sustainability, 12(21), Article 9194. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219194
Rubach, C., & Lazarides, R. (2021). Addressing 21st-century digital skills in schools – Development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers’ basic ICT competence beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, Article 106636. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2020.106636
Saarinen, A. I. L., Lipsanen, J., Hintsanen, M., Huotilainen, M., & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (2021). The use of digital technologies at school and cognitive learning outcomes: A population-based study in Finland. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 10(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17583/IJEP.2021.4667
Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2019). Is there a gender gap? A meta-analysis of the gender differences in students’ ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 27, 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EDUREV.2019.03.007
Skaalvik, C. (2020). School principal self-efficacy for instructional leadership: Relations with engagement, emotional exhaustion and motivation to quit. Social Psychology of Education, 23, 479-498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-020-09544-4
Sobreviñas, M. T. F. S., Falcoto, L. W. B., Espaldon, J. K. M., Encarnacion, S., Molleno, M. G., Lugtu, C. C., Ramos, S. J. L., Comendador, J., & Francisco, C. D. C. (2021). Effects of Students’ ICT Competencies on Their Research Capabilities and Productivity. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 55-59. https://bit.ly/3mgweLM
Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, Article 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314
Tiamiyu, T., Quoquab, F., & Mohammad, J. (2020). To switch or not to switch: The role of tourists’ psychological engagement in the context of Airbnb Malaysia. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 6(1), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-09-2019-0158
Timms, C., Fishman, T., Godineau, A., Granger, J., & Sibanda, T. (2018). Psychological engagement of university students: Learning communities and family relationships. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 10(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2017-0107
Tomczyk, Ł., Potyrała, K., Włoch, A., Wnęk-Gozdek, J., & Demeshkant, N. (2020). Evaluation of the functionality of a new e-learning platform vs. Previous experiences in e-learning and the self-assessment of own digital literacy. Sustainability, 12(23), Article 10219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310219
Uyun, M., & Warsah, I. (2021). Psikologi pendidikan [Educational psychology]. Deepublish.
Uyun, M., & Yoseanto, B. L. (2022a). Buku seri metode penelitian: Studi kasus confirmatory faktor analysis untuk penelitian psikologi dengan Amos [Research methods book series: Confirmatory factor analysis case studies for psychological research with Amos]. Deepublish.
Uyun, M., & Yoseanto, B. L. (2022b). Seri buku psikologi: pengantar metode penelitian kuantitatif [Psychology book series: Introduction to quantitative research methods]. Deepublish.
Vayre, E., & Vonthron, A.-M. (2017). Psychological engagement of students in distance and online learning: Effects of self-efficacy and psychosocial processes. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633116656849
Wilson, J. M., Gheith, R. H., Lowery, R. P., Reber, D. D., Stefan, M. W., Koche, L. S., Rolnik, B. M., Ganz, A. B., & Sharp, M. H. (2021). Non-traditional immersive seminars enhance learning by promoting greater physiological and psychological engagement compared to a traditional lecture format. Physiology & Behavior, 238, Article 113461. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYSBEH.2021.113461