logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Christiaan Huygensstraat 44, Zipcode:7533XB, Enschede, THE NETHERLANDS
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
Christiaan Huygensstraat 44, Zipcode:7533XB, Enschede, THE NETHERLANDS
collaborative research etwinning ite initiative teacher training

eTwinning in Science Learning: The Perspectives of Pre-service Primary School Teachers

María Napal-Fraile , María Isabel Zudaire , Svava Pétursdóttir , Jerneja Pavlin

eTwinning is a community of European schools that promotes networking and transnational collaboration projects. Therefore, as part of the Initial Teac.


  • Pub. date: October 15, 2024
  • Online Pub. date: May 26, 2024
  • Pages: 1555-1572
  • 105 Downloads
  • 483 Views
  • 0 Citations
e

eTwinning is a community of European schools that promotes networking and transnational collaboration projects. Therefore, as part of the Initial Teacher Education (ITE) initiative, we decided to explore how the research projects on scientific topics familiarize pre-service primary school teachers with eTwinning. 251 pre-service primary school teachers from Spain, Iceland, and Slovenia designed and carried out joint research projects on scientific topics. The aim was to gain insight into their self-assessment of their knowledge of the platform, the limitations of working with it, and their responses. An electronic questionnaire was used as the main instrument for data collection. It turned out that the pre-service teachers enjoyed this international collaboration, but also found it challenging. By the end of the projects, they were familiar with the eTwinning platform, although the least engaged prospective teachers recognized that they needed strong support and considered the platform a non-intuitive environment. Overall, they were willing to use the platform with pupils in the future, which is in line with the aim of the ITE initiative.

Keywords: Collaborative research, eTwinning, ITE initiative, teacher training.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
105
Download
483
Citations
Crossref
0

Scopus
0

References

 Acar, S., & Peker, B. (2021). What are the purposes of teachers for using the eTwinning platform and the effects of the platform on teachers? Acta Didactica Napocensia, 14(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.14.1.7

Aichhorn, N., & Puck, J. (2017). I just dont feel comfortable speaking English: Foreign language anxiety as a catalyst for spoken-language barriers in MNCs. International Business Review, 26(4), 749-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.01.004

Aksu, Z. H., & Reisoğlu, İ. (2023). Dezavantajlı bölgelerdeki öğretmenlerin eTwinning proje deneyimine göre dijital yeterliklerinin incelenmesi [Investigating the digital competencies of the teachers labouring in disadvantaged districts by eTwinning project experience]. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education/Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(1), 51-74. https://bit.ly/44xmZs0 

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1994). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press.

Arzi, H. J., & White, R. T. (2008). Change in teachers’ knowledge of subject matter: A 17- year longitudinal study. Science Education, 92(2), 221-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20239  

Başaran, M., Kaya, Z., Akbaş, N., & Yalçın, N. (2020). Reflection of eTwinning activity on teachers’ professional development in project-based teaching process. Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research, 6(3), 373-392. https://bit.ly/3UVops0

Bayucca, S. A. (2020). Teachers’ information and communication technology skills assessment: Basis for a comprehensive ICT training program. International Journal of Education Science Technology and Engineering, 3(2), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3751377  

Burden, K., Aubusson, P., Brindley, S., & Schuck, S. (2016). Changing knowledge, changing technology: Implications for teacher education futures. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2015.1125432  

Camilleri, R. -A. (2016). Global education and intercultural awareness in eTwinning. Cogent Education 3(1), Article 1210489. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1210489  

Cîmpean, E., & Bocoş, M. (2022). Developing digital competence and media literacy through PBL: Web 2.0 tools used in# DigitalEU–well do! eTwinning project. Educatia 21 Journal, (22), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.24193/ed21.2022.22.10

Delen, I., Özüdoğru, F., & Yavaş, B. (2021). Designing during the pandemic: Understanding teachers’ challenges in eTwinning projects. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26(4), 182-204. https://bit.ly/4bPE5Ux

Demir, N., & Kayaoğlu, M. N. (2022). Multi-dimensional foreign language education: The case of an eTwinning project in Turkey. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2201-2238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1871027 

Dewi, M. S., Setyosari, P., Kuswandi, D., & Ulfa, S. (2020). Analysis of kindergarten teachers on pedagogical content knowledge. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1701-1721. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1701  

European Commission. (n.d.). eTwinning for future teachers. https://bit.ly/3WzNFGK  

Eurydice. (2018). The structure of the European education systems 2018/19: Schematic diagrams. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2797/302115  

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449-2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4  

Fathi, J., & Derakhshan, A. (2019). Teacher self-efficacy and emotional regulation as predictors of teaching stress: An investigation of Iranian English language teachers. Teaching English Language, 13(2), 117-143. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2019.95883  

Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development: Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389  

Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. https://doi.org/10.2788/52966  

 Forbes, C. T. (2013). Curriculum-Dependent and curriculum-independent factors in preservice elementary teachers’ adaptation of science curriculum materials for inquiry-based science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9245-0  

Gajek, E., & Poszytek, P. (Eds.). (2009). eTwinning - A way to education of the future. Foundation for the Development of the Education System.

Garraway-Lashley, Y. M. (2019). Teaching science at the primary school level: “Problems teachers’ are facing”. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 7(3), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v7i3.5847  

Gilleran, A. (2019). eTwinning in an era of change - Impact on teachers’ practice, skills, and professional development opportunities, as reported by eTwinners. Central Support Service of eTwinning & European Schoolnet. https://bit.ly/44xmYnW  

Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085  

Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536  

Herranen, J., Kousa, P., Fooladi, E., & Aksela, M. (2019). Inquiry as a context-based practice – a case study of pre-service teachers’ beliefs and implementation of inquiry in context-based science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1977-1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1655679  

Howard, T. C., & Aleman, G. R. (2008). Teacher capacity for diverse learners: What do teachers need to know. In M.Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demes (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 157-174). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Huda SA, N., Suyanto, Arifi, A., Putranta, H., & Azizah, A. N. M. (2021). Experiences of participants in teacher professional education on obtaining soft skills: A case study in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 313-325. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.313  

Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Muszyńska, B. (2022). The role of eTwinning tools in social and curriculum integration using multimodal communication. Teaching English with Technology, 22(3-4), 63-84. https://bit.ly/4ac6C5l  

Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J. (2023). eTwinning and the development of language teachers’ digital literacy: A comparative study between two European universities. ENSAYOS, Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete, 38(2), 86-101. https://bit.ly/450Q8fG

İzgi Onbaşılı, Ü., Sezginsoy Şeker, B., Claeys, H., Mancel, C., Gulbay, E., & Powers, R. (2022). Experiences of qualified teachers of the future in the scope of an international eTwinning project. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 11(2), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.55020/iojpe.1182120  

Johnson, S. D., & Roellke, C. F. (1999). Secondary teachers’ and undergraduate education faculty members’ perceptions of teaching-effectiveness criteria: A national survey. Communication Education, 48(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379160

Kang, E. J. S., Bianchini, J. A., & Kelly, G. J. (2013). Crossing the border from science student to science teacher: preservice teachers’ views and experiences learning to teach inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 427-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9317-9   

Kaur, A., Lakra, P., & Kumar, R. (2020). Self-directed learning readiness and learning styles among nursing undergraduates. Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, 16(1), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.33698/NRF0265   

Khan, S. (2014). A model for integrating ICT into teacher training programs in Bangladesh based on TPCK. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 10(3), 21-31. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/148474/  

Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169-204, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285   

Kostas, A., & Ioannidou, D. (2023). Learning communities and teacher professional development: The case of eTwinning seminars. Creative Education, 14(13), 2800-2819. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.1413177  

Krumsvik, R. J., Jones, L. Ø., Øfstegaard, M., & Eikeland, O. J. (2016). Upper secondary school teachers’ digital competence: Analysed by demographic, personal and professional characteristics. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 11(3), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2016-03-02  

La Marca, A., & Gulbay, E. (2021). Enhancing innovative pedagogical practices in Initial Teacher Education: eTwinning. Nuova Secondaria, 7, 3-12. https://iris.unipa.it/handle/10447/486173  

Lantz-Anderson, A., Lundin, M., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.008   

Lázár, I. (2015). EFL learners intercultural competence development in an international web collaboration project. The Language Learning Journal, 43(2), 208-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.869941   

Lewis, A. D. (2019). Practice what you teach: How experiencing elementary school science teaching practices helps prepare teacher candidates. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, Article 102886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102886  

Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.577938  

Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.021  

Melville, W., Fazio, X., Bartley, A., & Jones, D. (2008). Experience and reflection: preservice science teachers’ capacity for teaching inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 477-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9104-9  

Menon, D., & Sadler, T. D. (2016). Preservice elementary teachers’ science self-efficacy beliefs and science content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(6), 649-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9479-y

Michos, K., & Hernández-Leo, D. (2020). CIDA: A collective inquiry framework to study and support teachers as designers in technological environments. Computers and Education, 143, Article 103679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103679  

Murphy, C., Neil, P., & Beggs, J. (2007). Primary science teacher confidence revisited: Ten years on. Educational Research, 49(4), 415-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701717289

Napal Fraile, M., Peñalva-Vélez, A., & Mendióroz Lacambra, A. M. (2018). Development of digital competence in secondary education teachers’ training. Education Sciences, 8(3), Article 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030104

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165  

Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290   

Nguyen, T. H. C. (2024). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence-powered facilitator in enhancing digital competencies of primary school teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 219-231. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.219  

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014). TALIS 2013 Results: An international perspective in teaching and learning TALIS. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264196261-en   

Papadakis, S. (2016). Creativity and innovation in European education. Ten years eTwinning. Past, present and the future. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(3-4), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2016.10001503  

Pham, M. C., Klamma, R., & Derntl, M. (2012). Dynamic visual analytics for lifelong learning communities (Project report Tellnet). Teachers’ Lifelong Learning Network. https://bit.ly/4aAcW6S

Polias, J. (2016). Apprenticing students into science: Doing, talking & writing scientifically. Lexis Education.

Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770  

Sanmartí, N., & Márquez Bargallo, C. (2012). Enseñar a plantear preguntas investigables [Teach to ask research questions]. Alambique: Didáctica de Las Ciencias Experimentales, (70), 27-36. https://bit.ly/3UBJhUS  

Sary, F. P., Dudija, N., & Moslem, M. (2023). Do digital competency and self-leadership influence teachers innovative work behavior? European Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 1449-1463. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.3.1449  

Schmidt, M., & Fulton, L. (2016). Transforming a traditional inquiry-based science unit into a stem unit for elementary pre-service teachers: A view from the trenches. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9594-0  

Şengül, S. H., Çetin, G., & Gür, H. (2008). The primary school science teachers’ problems in science teaching. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(3), 82-88. https://bit.ly/3ybuwAR  

Simonson, M., Zvacek, S. M., & Smaldino, S. (2019). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (7th ed.). Information Age Publishing.

Taber, K. S. (2014). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogic content knowledge. Teacher Development, 18(3), 441-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2014.938464  

Tan, C. K., Auh, M. H. A., & Lee, K. W. (2019). The difference in the definition of successful implementation of the ICT curriculum between the teacher trainees, administrator and lecturer. Journal of Information System and Technology Management, 4(14), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.35631/jistm.414001  

Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Ozkan, O. (2004). Turkish pre-service science teachers understanding of science and their confidence in teaching it. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747032000162316  

Tonner-Saunders, S., & Shimi, J. (2022). Exploring student teachers’ experiences of engaging in hands of the world, a contextualised global intercultural eTwinning project. International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, 2(4), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.33422/ijhep.v2i4.104  

Tosi, A., & Baptista, R. (2023). The role of eTwinning in initial teacher training. ENSAYOS, Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete, 38(2), V–VII. https://bit.ly/4dSYA4B

Tum, D. O. (2012). Feelings of language anxiety amongst non-native student teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 2055-2059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.948  

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2023, October 18). UNESCOs ICT Competency framework for teachers. https://bit.ly/4b9uZSz  

Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002  

Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004  

Vuorikari, R., Berlanga, A., Cachia, R., Cao, Y., Fetter, S., Gilleran, A., Klamma, R., Punie, Y., Scimeca, S., Sloep, P., & Petrushyna, Z. (2011). ICT-based school collaboration, teachers’ networks and their opportunities for teachers’ professional development - A case study on eTwinning. In H. Leung, E. Popescu, Y. Cao, R. W. H. Lau, &. W. Nejdl (Eds.), Advances in web-based learning - ICWL 2011 (pp. 112-121). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25813-8_12   

Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2009). How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information. Computers and Education, 52(1), 234-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.003  

Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Open University Press.

Woolston, C., & Osório, J. (2019, June 10). When English is not your mother tongue. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01797-0

Yoon, S., Pedretti, E., Pedretti, L., Hewitt, J., Perris, K., & Van Oostveen, R. (2006). Exploring the use of cases and case methods in influencing elementary preservice science teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(1), 15-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-005-9005-0

...