Acar, S., & Peker, B. (2021). What are the purposes of teachers for using the eTwinning platform and the effects of the platform on teachers? Acta Didactica Napocensia, 14(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.14.1.7

Aichhorn, N., & Puck, J. (2017). I just don’t feel comfortable speaking English: Foreign language anxiety as a catalyst for spoken-language barriers in MNCs. International Business Review, 26(4), 749-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.01.004

Aksu, Z. H., & Reisoğlu, İ. (2023). Dezavantajlı bölgelerdeki öğretmenlerin eTwinning proje deneyimine göre dijital yeterliklerinin incelenmesi [Investigating the digital competencies of the teachers labouring in disadvantaged districts by eTwinning project experience]. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education/Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36(1), 51-74. https://bit.ly/44xmZs0 

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1994). Benchmarks for science literacy. Oxford University Press.

Arzi, H. J., & White, R. T. (2008). Change in teachers’ knowledge of subject matter: A 17- year longitudinal study. Science Education, 92(2), 221-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20239  

Başaran, M., Kaya, Z., Akbaş, N., & Yalçın, N. (2020). Reflection of eTwinning activity on teachers’ professional development in project-based teaching process. Journal of Education, Theory and Practical Research, 6(3), 373-392. https://bit.ly/3UVops0

Bayucca, S. A. (2020). Teachers’ information and communication technology skills assessment: Basis for a comprehensive ICT training program. International Journal of Education Science Technology and Engineering, 3(2), 85-93. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3751377  

Burden, K., Aubusson, P., Brindley, S., & Schuck, S. (2016). Changing knowledge, changing technology: Implications for teacher education futures. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2015.1125432  

Camilleri, R. -A. (2016). Global education and intercultural awareness in eTwinning. Cogent Education 3(1), Article 1210489. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1210489  

Cîmpean, E., & Bocoş, M. (2022). Developing digital competence and media literacy through PBL: Web 2.0 tools used in# DigitalEU–we’ll do! eTwinning project. Educatia 21 Journal, (22), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.24193/ed21.2022.22.10

Delen, I., Özüdoğru, F., & Yavaş, B. (2021). Designing during the pandemic: Understanding teachers’ challenges in eTwinning projects. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26(4), 182-204. https://bit.ly/4bPE5Ux

Demir, N., & Kayaoğlu, M. N. (2022). Multi-dimensional foreign language education: The case of an eTwinning project in Turkey. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2201-2238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1871027 

Dewi, M. S., Setyosari, P., Kuswandi, D., & Ulfa, S. (2020). Analysis of kindergarten teachers on pedagogical content knowledge. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1701-1721. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1701  

European Commission. (n.d.). eTwinning for future teachers. https://bit.ly/3WzNFGK  

Eurydice. (2018). The structure of the European education systems 2018/19: Schematic diagrams. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2797/302115  

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2449-2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4  

Fathi, J., & Derakhshan, A. (2019). Teacher self-efficacy and emotional regulation as predictors of teaching stress: An investigation of Iranian English language teachers. Teaching English Language, 13(2), 117-143. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2019.95883  

Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development: Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389  

Ferrari, A. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. https://doi.org/10.2788/52966  

 Forbes, C. T. (2013). Curriculum-Dependent and curriculum-independent factors in preservice elementary teachers’ adaptation of science curriculum materials for inquiry-based science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9245-0  

Gajek, E., & Poszytek, P. (Eds.). (2009). eTwinning - A way to education of the future. Foundation for the Development of the Education System.

Garraway-Lashley, Y. M. (2019). Teaching science at the primary school level: “Problems teachers’ are facing”. Asian Journal of Education and e-Learning, 7(3), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.24203/ajeel.v7i3.5847  

Gilleran, A. (2019). eTwinning in an era of change - Impact on teachers’ practice, skills, and professional development opportunities, as reported by eTwinners. Central Support Service of eTwinning & European Schoolnet. https://bit.ly/44xmYnW  

Guðmundsdóttir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085  

Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782536  

Herranen, J., Kousa, P., Fooladi, E., & Aksela, M. (2019). Inquiry as a context-based practice – a case study of pre-service teachers’ beliefs and implementation of inquiry in context-based science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 41(14), 1977-1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1655679  

Howard, T. C., & Aleman, G. R. (2008). Teacher capacity for diverse learners: What do teachers need to know. In M.Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. E. Demes (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 157-174). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Huda SA, N., Suyanto, Arifi, A., Putranta, H., & Azizah, A. N. M. (2021). Experiences of participants in teacher professional education on obtaining soft skills: A case study in Indonesia. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 313-325. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.313  

Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Muszyńska, B. (2022). The role of eTwinning tools in social and curriculum integration using multimodal communication. Teaching English with Technology, 22(3-4), 63-84. https://bit.ly/4ac6C5l  

Huertas-Abril, C. A., & Palacios-Hidalgo, F. J. (2023). eTwinning and the development of language teachers’ digital literacy: A comparative study between two European universities. ENSAYOS, Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete, 38(2), 86-101. https://bit.ly/450Q8fG

İzgi Onbaşılı, Ü., Sezginsoy Şeker, B., Claeys, H., Mancel, C., Gulbay, E., & Powers, R. (2022). Experiences of qualified teachers of the future in the scope of an international eTwinning project. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 11(2), 293-311. https://doi.org/10.55020/iojpe.1182120  

Johnson, S. D., & Roellke, C. F. (1999). Secondary teachers’ and undergraduate education faculty members’ perceptions of teaching-effectiveness criteria: A national survey. Communication Education, 48(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379160

Kang, E. J. S., Bianchini, J. A., & Kelly, G. J. (2013). Crossing the border from science student to science teacher: preservice teachers’ views and experiences learning to teach inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(3), 427-447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9317-9   

Kaur, A., Lakra, P., & Kumar, R. (2020). Self-directed learning readiness and learning styles among nursing undergraduates. Nursing and Midwifery Research Journal, 16(1), 44-54. https://doi.org/10.33698/NRF0265   

Khan, S. (2014). A model for integrating ICT into teacher training programs in Bangladesh based on TPCK. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 10(3), 21-31. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/148474/  

Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169-204, https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260903142285   

Kostas, A., & Ioannidou, D. (2023). Learning communities and teacher professional development: The case of eTwinning seminars. Creative Education, 14(13), 2800-2819. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.1413177  

Krumsvik, R. J., Jones, L. Ø., Øfstegaard, M., & Eikeland, O. J. (2016). Upper secondary school teachers’ digital competence: Analysed by demographic, personal and professional characteristics. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 11(3), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2016-03-02  

La Marca, A., & Gulbay, E. (2021). Enhancing innovative pedagogical practices in Initial Teacher Education: eTwinning. Nuova Secondaria, 7, 3-12. https://iris.unipa.it/handle/10447/486173  

Lantz-Anderson, A., Lundin, M., & Selwyn, N. (2018). Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.008   

Lázár, I. (2015). EFL learners’ intercultural competence development in an international web collaboration project. The Language Learning Journal, 43(2), 208-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.869941   

Lewis, A. D. (2019). Practice what you teach: How experiencing elementary school science teaching practices helps prepare teacher candidates. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, Article 102886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102886  

Livingstone, S. (2012). Critical reflections on the benefits of ICT in education. Oxford Review of Education, 38(1), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.577938  

Macià, M., & García, I. (2016). Informal online communities and networks as a source of teacher professional development: A review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.021  

Melville, W., Fazio, X., Bartley, A., & Jones, D. (2008). Experience and reflection: preservice science teachers’ capacity for teaching inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 477-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9104-9  

Menon, D., & Sadler, T. D. (2016). Preservice elementary teachers’ science self-efficacy beliefs and science content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(6), 649-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9479-y

Michos, K., & Hernández-Leo, D. (2020). CIDA: A collective inquiry framework to study and support teachers as designers in technological environments. Computers and Education, 143, Article 103679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103679  

Murphy, C., Neil, P., & Beggs, J. (2007). Primary science teacher confidence revisited: Ten years on. Educational Research, 49(4), 415-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131880701717289

Napal Fraile, M., Peñalva-Vélez, A., & Mendióroz Lacambra, A. M. (2018). Development of digital competence in secondary education teachers’ training. Education Sciences, 8(3), Article 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8030104

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165  

Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290   

Nguyen, T. H. C. (2024). Exploring the role of artificial intelligence-powered facilitator in enhancing digital competencies of primary school teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 219-231. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.1.219  

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014). TALIS 2013 Results: An international perspective in teaching and learning TALIS. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264196261-en   

Papadakis, S. (2016). Creativity and innovation in European education. Ten years eTwinning. Past, present and the future. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 8(3-4), 279-296. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2016.10001503  

Pham, M. C., Klamma, R., & Derntl, M. (2012). Dynamic visual analytics for lifelong learning communities (Project report Tellnet). Teachers’ Lifelong Learning Network. https://bit.ly/4aAcW6S

Polias, J. (2016). Apprenticing students into science: Doing, talking & writing scientifically. Lexis Education.

Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. European Commission, Joint Research Centre. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770  

Sanmartí, N., & Márquez Bargallo, C. (2012). Enseñar a plantear preguntas investigables [Teach to ask research questions]. Alambique: Didáctica de Las Ciencias Experimentales, (70), 27-36. https://bit.ly/3UBJhUS  

Sary, F. P., Dudija, N., & Moslem, M. (2023). Do digital competency and self-leadership influence teachers’ innovative work behavior? European Journal of Educational Research, 12(3), 1449-1463. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.3.1449  

Schmidt, M., & Fulton, L. (2016). Transforming a traditional inquiry-based science unit into a stem unit for elementary pre-service teachers: A view from the trenches. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25, 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9594-0  

Şengül, S. H., Çetin, G., & Gür, H. (2008). The primary school science teachers’ problems in science teaching. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 5(3), 82-88. https://bit.ly/3ybuwAR  

Simonson, M., Zvacek, S. M., & Smaldino, S. (2019). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (7th ed.). Information Age Publishing.

Taber, K. S. (2014). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogic content knowledge. Teacher Development, 18(3), 441-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2014.938464  

Tan, C. K., Auh, M. H. A., & Lee, K. W. (2019). The difference in the definition of successful implementation of the ICT curriculum between the teacher trainees, administrator and lecturer. Journal of Information System and Technology Management, 4(14), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.35631/jistm.414001  

Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Ozkan, O. (2004). Turkish pre-service science teachers’ understanding of science and their confidence in teaching it. Journal of Education for Teaching, 30(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260747032000162316  

Tonner-Saunders, S., & Shimi, J. (2022). Exploring student teachers’ experiences of engaging in hands of the world, a contextualised global intercultural eTwinning project. International Journal of Higher Education Pedagogies, 2(4), 10-20. https://doi.org/10.33422/ijhep.v2i4.104  

Tosi, A., & Baptista, R. (2023). The role of eTwinning in initial teacher training. ENSAYOS, Revista de la Facultad de Educación de Albacete, 38(2), V–VII. https://bit.ly/4dSYA4B

Tum, D. O. (2012). Feelings of language anxiety amongst non-native student teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 2055-2059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.948  

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2023, October 18). UNESCO’s ICT Competency framework for teachers. https://bit.ly/4b9uZSz  

Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2015). Teacher collaboration: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 15, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.04.002  

Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004  

Vuorikari, R., Berlanga, A., Cachia, R., Cao, Y., Fetter, S., Gilleran, A., Klamma, R., Punie, Y., Scimeca, S., Sloep, P., & Petrushyna, Z. (2011). ICT-based school collaboration, teachers’ networks and their opportunities for teachers’ professional development - A case study on eTwinning. In H. Leung, E. Popescu, Y. Cao, R. W. H. Lau, &. W. Nejdl (Eds.), Advances in web-based learning - ICWL 2011 (pp. 112-121). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25813-8_12   

Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2009). How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information. Computers and Education, 52(1), 234-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.003  

Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Open University Press.

Woolston, C., & Osório, J. (2019, June 10). When English is not your mother tongue. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01797-0

Yoon, S., Pedretti, E., Pedretti, L., Hewitt, J., Perris, K., & Van Oostveen, R. (2006). Exploring the use of cases and case methods in influencing elementary preservice science teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(1), 15-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-005-9005-0