logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Christiaan Huygensstraat 44, Zipcode:7533XB, Enschede, THE NETHERLANDS
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
Christiaan Huygensstraat 44, Zipcode:7533XB, Enschede, THE NETHERLANDS
Review Article

Exploring Biological Literacy: A Systematic Literature Review of Biological Literacy

Helin Semilarski , Anne Laius

A large number of articles in the field of science education reflect on scientific literacy as the main goal of science education (SE), although often.

A

A large number of articles in the field of science education reflect on scientific literacy as the main goal of science education (SE), although often with varying viewpoints. Nevertheless, researchers have begun to highlight subject-specific teaching practices that are expected to specifically enhance science subject teaching, including biology. The main aim of this theoretical article is to come on consensus and to conceptualise the term biological literacy (BL) more clearly and to present a theoretical concept of BL, composed on the basis of systematically analysed articles. This theoretical concept includes two dimensions of BL: (1) cognitive (cognitive skills, conceptual understanding, biological inquiry) and (2) affective dimension, based on systematic literature review (SLR). This theoretical concept also includes in addition four dimensions of BL: (3) sustainability; (4) interdisciplinarity, (5) career awareness and (6) nature of biology (NOB), based on literature review (LR) of recent decades, that was conducted to write theoretical overview of this research.

Keywords: Biology education, biological literacy, theoretical concept, systematic literature review.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
1974
Download
2380
Citations
Crossref
4

Scopus
3

References

Adegboye, M. C., Ganiyu, B., & Isaac, O. A. (2017). Conceptions of the nature of biology held by senior secondary school biology teachers in Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(3), 1–12.

Aguinis, H., Ramani, S. R., & Alabduljader, N. (2018). What you see is what you get? Enhancing methodological transparency in management research. The Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 83–110. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0011

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: a call to action. https://cutt.ly/gmouRGP

Baum, A. D., & Offner, S. (2008). Phylogenies & tree-thinking. The American Biology Teacher, 70(4), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.2307/30163248

Baumgartner, E., Biga, L., Bledsoe, K., Dawson, J., Grammer, J., Howard, A., & Snyder, J. (2015). Exploring phytoplankton population investigation growth to enhance quantitative literacy. American Biology Teacher77(4), 265–272. http://www.doi.org/10.1525/abt.2015.77.4.6

Begley, S. G. (2012). Vision and changing a first-year biology classroom. Journal of Microbiology & BE, 13(1), 83–85. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v13i1.381 

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.

Brigati, R. J., England, J. B., & Schussler, E. E. (2020). How do undergraduates cope with anxiety resulting from active learning practices in introductory biology? PLoSONE, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236558

Bryant, J. A., & Velle, L. B. (2018). Introduction to bioethics. John Wiley & Sons.

Bybee, R. W. (2009). Program for international student assessment (PISA) 2006 and scientific literacy: A perspective for Science Education leaders. Science Educator, 18(2), 1–13.

Cebesoy, B. Ü., & Tekkaya, C. (2012). Pre-service science teachers’ genetic literacy level and attitudes towards genetics. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 31, 56–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.016

Cheruvelil, S. K., & Ye, X. (2012). Do college introductory biology courses increase student ecological literacy? Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(2), 50–56.

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of socialfutures. Routledge.

Davenport, K. D., Milks, J. K., & Tassell, V. R. (2015). Investigating tree thinking & ancestry with cladograms. The American Biology Teacher, 77(3), 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2015.77.3.8

Demastes, S., & Wandersee, H. J. (1992). Biological literacy in a college biology classroom. BioScience, 42(1), 63–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/1311631

Demir, E. (2016). Characteristics of 15–year–old students predicting scientific literacy skills in Turkey. International Education Studies, 9(4), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n4p99

Dolan, E. L., Elliott, L. S., Henderson, C., Curran-Everett, E., St. John, K., & Ortiz, A. P. (2018). Evaluating discipline-based education research for promotion and tenure. Innovative Higher Education, 43(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-017-9406-y

Dorfner, T., Förtsch, C., Germ, M., & Neuhaus, J. B. (2018). Biology instruction using a generic framework of scientific reasoning and argumentation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.003

Duncan, G. R., & Boerwinkel, J. D. (2018). Molecular biology. In K. Kampourakis & M. J., Reiss (Eds.), Teaching biology in school: Global research, issues, and trends (pp. 35–47). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110158

Eijck, M., & Roth, W. M. (2010). Theorizing scientific literacy in the wild. Educational Research Review, 5, 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.03.002

Ellis, J. G., & Riches, N. J. (1978). Safety in Biology Laboratories. In J. G. Ellis & N. J. Riches (Eds.), Safety and Laboratory Practice (56–63). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-03606-6_7

Ertekin, T., & Yüksel, Ç. (2014). The role of ecological literacy education with academic support in raising environmental awareness for high school students: “Enka ecological literacy summer camp project case study”. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 120(19), 124–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.089

Evans, D. L., Bailey, S. G., Thumser, A. E., Trinder, S. L., Winstone, N. E., & Bailey, I. G. (2020). The Biochemical Literacy Framework: Inviting pedagogical innovation in higher education. FEBS Open Bio, 10 (9), 1720–1736. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12938

Fiedler, D., Sbeglia, C. G., Nehm, H. R., & Harms, U. (2019). How strongly does statistical reasoning influence knowledge and acceptance of evolution? Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 56, 1183–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21547

Firat, A. E., & Köksal, M. S. (2019). Development and validation of the biotechnology literacy test. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 47(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21216

Fisch, C., & Block, J. (2018). Six tips for your (systematic) literature review in business and management research. Management Review Quarterly, 68(2), 103–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-018-0142-x

Fives, H., Huebner, W., Birnbaum, S. A., & Nicolich, M. (2014). Developing a measure of scientific literature for middle school students. Science Education, 98(4), 549–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21115

Gardner, G. E., Bonner, J., Landin, J., Ferzli, M., & Shea, D. (2016). Nonmajors’ shifts in attitudes & perceptions of biology & biologists following an active-learning course: An Exploratory Study. American Biology Teacher, 78(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2016.78.1.43

Garthwaite, K., France, B., & Ward, G. (2014). The complexity of scientific literacy: The development and use of a data analysis matrix. International Journal of Science Education36(10), 1568–1587. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.870363

Gould, K. S., Gilbert, A., Pike, A. J., & Menzies, I. J. (2019). Interactive touch-screen monitors facilitate collaborative learning of microscopy skills in an introductory-level plant biology lab. Journal of Biological Education53(1), 47–53.

Green, B. A. (1997). The role of personal values in professional decisionmaking. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics11(19), 19–60.

Halmo, M. S., Sensibaugh, A. C., Bhatia, S. K., Howell, A., Ferryanto, P. E., Choe, B., Kehoe, K., Watson, M., & Lemons, P. P. (2018). Student difficulties during structure-function problem solving. Biochemistry and molecular education, 46(5), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.21166

Hartley, M. L., Momsen, J., Maskiewicz, A., & D’Avanzo, C. (2012). Energy and matter: Differences in discourse in physical and biological sciences can be confusing for introductory biology students. BioScience, 62(5), 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.5.10

Hoagstrom, W. C., Xiang, L., Lewis-Rogers, N., Connors, K. P., Sessions-Robinson, A., & Mull, F. J. (2019). A quantitative simulation of coevolution with mutation using playing cards. The American Teacher, 81(2), 127–132. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2019.81.2.127

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmäe, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education4(3), 275–288.

Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2009). The influence of emotion on students' performance in dissection exercises, Journal of Biological Education43(4), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2009.9656177

Hoots, R. (1999). Biological Literacy in a Nonreductionist Environment: Putting Life Back into Biology. The American Biology Teacher61(3), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.2307/4450651

Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). Increasing Students’ Scientific Creativity: The “Learn to Think” Intervention Program. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20

Hunt, L., Koenders, A., & Gynnild, V. (2012). Assessing practical laboratory skills in undergraduate molecular biology courses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education37(7), 861–874. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.576313

Illingworth, S., Burke da Silva, K., & Butler, A. (2012). Investigations of socio-biological literacy of science and non-science students. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 20(2), 55–67.

Jacque, B., Koch-Weser, S., Faux, R., & Meiri, K. (2016). Addressing health literacy challenges with a cutting-edge infectious disease curriculum for the high school biology classroom. Health Education & Behavior, 43(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198115596163

Jones, G. (1989). Biological Literacy. The American Biology Teacher, 51(8), 480–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/4448993

Kampa, N., & Köller, O. (2016). German national proficiency scales in biology: Internal structure, relations to general cognitive abilities and verbal skills. Science Education100(5), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21227

Kaye, C., & Korf, B. (2013). Genetic Literacy and Competency. Pediatrics, 132(Supplement 3), S224–S230. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1032G

Kloser, J. M. (2012). A place for the nature of biology in biology education. Electronical Journal of Science Education, 16(1), 1–18.

Klucevsek, K. (2017). The intersection of information and science literacy. Communication in Information Literacy, 11(2), 354–365.

Klymkowsky, W. M. (2005). Can Nonmajors Courses Lead to Biological Literacy? Do Majors Courses Do Any Better? Cell Biology Education, 4, 196–198.

Klymkowsky, W. M. (2010). Thinking about Conceptual Foundations of the Biological Sciences. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 9, 405–407. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-04-0061

Köksal, M., & Köksal, B. (2012). Investigating Understandings of Turkish Medical Graduate Students about Nature of Scientific Knowledge, Scientific Method, Characteristics of Scientists and Definition of Science. Education In Medicine Journal, 4(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.5959/eimj.v4i1.14

Krakow, M., Ratcliff, C. L., Hesse, B. W., & Greenberg-Worisek, A. J. (2017). Assessing Genetic Literacy Awareness and Knowledge Gaps in the US Population: Results from the Health Information National Trends Survey. Public Health Genomics, 20(6), 343–348. https://doi.org/10.1159/000489117

Landis, J. R,, & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

Lazaros, E., & Embree, C. (2016). A case for teaching biotechnology. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 75(5), 8–11.

Lederman, G. N. (2018). Nature of scientific knowledge and scientific inquiry in biology teaching. Teaching and Learning in Science Series.

Lederman, G. N., Lederman, S. J., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138–147.

Lemons, D. J. (1994). Promoting biological literacy. BioScience, 44(7), 475–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/1312244

May, S. R., Cook, L. D., & May, K. M. (2013). Biological dialogues: How to Teach Your Students to Learn Fluency in Biology. The American Biology Teacher, 75(7), 486–493. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2013.75.7.8

McInerney, D. J. (1996). Why biological literacy matters: a review of commentaries related to the bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in american life. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 71(1), 81–96.

Mertens, R. T., & Hendrix, R. J. (1982). Responsible decision-making: A tool for developing biological literacy. The American Biology Teacher, 44(3), 148–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/4447449

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The PRISMA.

Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, A. L., & PRISMA-P Group. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

Nagle, B. (2013). Preparing high school students for the interdisciplinary nature of modern biology. CBELife Sciences Education, 12(2), 144–147. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-03-0047

Narguizian, P. (2019). Seven pillars of biology literacy: A proposal for what secondary school teachers might teach & what college instructors should reinforce. The American Biology Teacher, 81(3), 145.  https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2019.81.3.145

Nolet, V. (2017). Quality education: Cultural competence and a sustainability worldview. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 53(4), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2017.1369276

Oliveira, J. V., Lopes, F. S., Barboza, D. R. R., Trovao, B. M., Ramos, B. M., & Alves, N. R. R. (2019). Wild vertebrates and their representation by urban/rural students in a region of northeast Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 15(1), 1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-018-0283-y

Onel, A., & Firat Durdukoca, S. (2019). Identifying the predictive power of biological literacy and attitudes toward biology in academic achievement in high school students. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 11(2), 214–228. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2019.02.014

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en

Pope, D. S., Rounds, M. C., & Clarke-Midura, J. (2017). Testing the effectiveness of two natural selection simulations in the context of a large-enrollment undergraduate laboratory class. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 10(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-017-0067-1

Porter, J. R. (2005). Information literacy in biology education: An example from an advanced cell biology course. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.04-12-0060

Post, A., Semilarski, H., & Laius, A. (2017). Assessing the biological literacy cognitive components of 10th and 11th grade students. Estonian Journal of Education, 5(1), 206–238. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2017.5.1.07

Reiss, M. J., & Kampourakis, K. (2018). Introduction: Biology didactics. In K. Kampourakis & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Teaching biology in school: Global research, issues, and trends (pp. 1–8). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110158

Riddle, O. (1954). High schools and biological literacy in the United States. American Biology Teacher, 16(7), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.2307/4438636

Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific Literacy, Science Literacy and Science Education. In N. G. Lederman, & S. K. Abell, Handbook of Research on Science Education (Vol.2, pp. 545–558). Routledge.

Roberts, R. (2001). Procedural understanding in biology: The “thinking behind the doing”. Journal of Biological Education, 35(3), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2001.9655758

Roberts, R., & Gott, R. (2010). Questioning the evidence for a claim in a socio‐scientific issue: An aspect of Scientific Literacy. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(3), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2010.506413

Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2004). Conducting a literature review. Management Research News27(6), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185

Sbeglia, C. G., & Nehm, H. R. (2019). Do you see what I-SEA? A Rasch analysis of the psychometric properties of the inventory of student evolution acceptance. Science Education, 103(2), 287–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21494

Scott‐Phillips, T. C. (2008). Defining biological communication. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21(2), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01497

Singer, R. S., Nielsen, R. N., & Schweingruber, A. H. (2013). Biology Education Research: Lessons and Future Directions. CBE–Life Sciences Education, 12(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-03-0058

Smith, V. K., Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Dimitrakopoulos, C. (2012). Developing scientific literacy in a primary school. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.565088

Šorgo, A., & Špernjak, A. (2020). Biology content and classroom experience as predictors of career aspirations. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(2), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.317

Stern, F., & Kampourakis, K. (2017). Teaching for genetics literacy in the post-genomic era. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 193–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2017.1392731

Suwono, H., Pratiwi, H., Susanto, H., & Susilo, H. (2017). Enhancement of students’ biological literacy and critical thinking of biology through socio-biological case-based learning. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/0.15294/jpii.v6i2.9622

Trevino, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.2307/258313

Uitto, A. (2014). Interest, attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs explaining upper-secondary school students’ orientation towards biology-related careers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 1425–1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9516-2

Uno, G. E. (2009). Botanical literacy: What and how should students learn about plants? American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1753–1759. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900025

Uno, G. E., & Bybee, W. R. (1994). Understanding the dimensions of biological literacy. BioScience, 44(8), 553–557. https://doi.org/10.2307/1312283

Vermeulen, N., Parker, J. N., & Penders, B. (2013). Understanding life together: A brief history of collaboration in biology. Endeavour, 37(3), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endeavour.2013.03.001

Vickers, D., Lee, M. D., Dry, M., & Hughes, P. (2003). The role of the convex hull and the number of potential intersections in performance on visually presented traveling salesperson problems. Memory and Cognition, 31(7), 1094–1104. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196130

Voithofer, R. (2012). Genetic Literacy and Problem-Based Learning. In S. B. Fee & B. R. Belland (Eds.), The Role of Criticism in Understanding Problem Solving: Honoring the Work of John C. Belland (pp. 197–214). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3540-2_13

Ward, D. (2011). From the president. The American Biology Teacher, 73(2), 65–65. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2011.73.2.1

Weber, F. C. (2014). Hormones and antibiotics in nature: A Laboratory Module Designed to Broaden Undergraduate Perspectives on Typically Human-Centered Topics. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 15(2), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.734

Weber, F. C. (2017). Microgreen farming and nutrition: A discovery-based laboratory module to cultivate biological and information literacy in undergraduates. The American Biology Teacher, 79(5), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2017.79.5.375

Wright, L. R. (2005). Points of view: Content versus process: Is this a fair choice? Undergraduate biology courses for non-scientists: Toward a lived curriculum. Cell Biology Education, 4(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-04-0075

Wright, L. R., Dy, C. E. G., & Newman, L. D. (2020). Undergraduate textbook representations of meiosis neglect essential elements. The American Biology Teacher, 82(5), 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2020.82.5.296

Yip, D. Y. (2000). Bringing life back to the biology laboratory — investigations with mealworms. Journal of Biological Education, 34(2), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2000.9655694

Zangori, L., & Koontz, A. J. (2017). Supporting upper-level undergraduate students in building a systems perspective in a botany course. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1257502

...