Primary Science Teachers’ Perspectives about Metacognition in Science Teaching
Tajularipin Sulaiman
,
Suzieleez Syrene Abdul-Rahim
,
Wong Kai Yan
,
Punnithann Subramaniam
Metacognition in science teaching involves processes that include self-awareness and self-regulation. Metacognition enables the teachers to facilitate.
- Pub. date: January 15, 2021
- Pages: 75-84
- 1054 Downloads
- 1246 Views
- 5 Citations
Metacognition in science teaching involves processes that include self-awareness and self-regulation. Metacognition enables the teachers to facilitate student learning and to reflect on their teaching in order to enable themselves to improve or to make any changes to their teaching. In particular, teaching activities, especially in the 21st century, do not merely involve the transfer of knowledge and then applying that knowledge into daily life, but teachers need to reflect, plan and evaluate learning outcomes to enhance further in teaching. This study attempts to gain the perspective and implementation of metacognition skills in teaching science in the primary school classroom. The data was collected through a qualitative research method based on interviews with six science teachers in primary school using semi-structured interview protocol. The interview data were analysed for emerging themes, guided by the research questions. Teachers have a similar perspective of the understanding of metacognition in science teaching. Further discussion focuses on the implementation of metacognition in science teaching. This discussion is divided into three aspects, which are constraints faced, overcoming the constraints, and efforts made to implement metacognition in science teaching. Hence, the understanding of science teachers in regards to metacognition in science teaching is important and gives a positive impact towards teaching and learning in primary science teaching.
Keywords: Metacognition, primary science, reflection, primary teachers.
References
Abdullah, A. H., Abdul Rahman, S. N. S., & Hamzah, M. H. (2017). Metacognitive skills of Malaysian students in non-routine mathematical problem solving. Bolema, Mathematics Education Bullentin/ Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 31(57), 310-322.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. (2020, September 30). Adolescent Health. https://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/adolescent-development/explained/cognitive/index.html
Ahdhianto, E., Marsigit, Haryanto, & Santi, N. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive-based contextual learning model on fifth-grade students’ problem-solving and communication skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 753-764. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.753.
Avargil, S., Lavi, R., & Dori, Y. J. (2018). Students’ metacognition and metacognitive strategies in science education. In Y. J. Dori, Z. Mevareach, & D. Bake (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM Education (pp. 33-64). Springer.
Bromley, M. (2019). Metacognition in the primary school classroom. Headteacher Update. https://www.headteacher-update.com/best-practice-article/metacognition-in-the-primary-school-classroom/216221/
Chatzipanteli, A., Grammatikopoulos, V., & Gregoriadis, A. (2013). Development and evaluation of metacognition in early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 184(8), 1223–1232.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Education research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Fauzi, A., & Sa’diyah, W. (2019). Students’ Metacognitive Skills from the Viewpoint of Answering Biological Questions: Is It Already Good? Indonesian Journal of Science Education/ Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(3), 317-327.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Glaze, A. L. (2018). Teaching and learning science in the 21st century: challenging critical assumptions in post-secondary science. Education Sciences, 8(12), 1-8. http://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8010012
Mahajan, M., & Sarjit Singh, M. K. (2017). Importance and benefits of learning outcomes. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 22(3), 65-67.
McAlister, A. M., Lee, D. M., Ehlert, K. M., Kajfez, R. L., Faber, C. J., & Kennedy, M. S. (2017, June 24-28). Qualitative coding: An approach to assess inter-rater [Paper presentation]. American Society for Engineering Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Meggitt, C. (2012). Understand Child Development: Teach Yourself. Hachette.
Mendez Hinojosa, L. M, Cardenas Rodriguez, M., & Ortiz Paez, C. A. (2020). Measurement of metacognition: adaptation of metacognitive state inventory in Spanish to Mexican university students. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 413-421. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.413.
Mevarech, Z. R., & Fan, L. (2018). Cognition, metacognition, and mathematics literacy. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, culture in STEM education (pp.261-278). Springer.
Miller Jr, H. L. (Ed.). (2016). The Sage encyclopedia of theory in psychology. SAGE Publications.
Ministry of Education. (2013). Preschoool to Post- Secondary Education. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Murray, J. W. (2014). Higher-order thinking and metacognition in the first year core-education classroom: A case study in the use of color-coded drafts. Open Review of Educational Research, 1(1), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2014.964297
Nazarieh, M. (2016). A brief history of metacognition and principles of metacognitive instruction in learning. BEST: Journal of Humanities, Arts, Medicine and Sciences, 2(2), 61-64.
Neuman, L. W. (2007). Social research methods, 6/E. Pearson Education.
O’Hara, S., Pritchard, R., & Pitta, D. (2019). Teaching with and for metacognition in disciplinary discussions. In N. Feza (Ed.), Metacognition in learning (pp.1-20). IntechOpen.
Ong, K. K. A., Hart, C. E., & Chen, P, K. (2016). Promoting higher-order thinking through teacher questioning: A case study of a Singapore science classroom. New Waves Educational Research & Development, 19(1), 1-19.
Pedone, F. (2014, March 10 -12). How to improve metacognitive in primary school [Paper presentation]. 8th International Technology, Education and Development (INTED2014), Valencia, Spain.
Rahman, S., Yasin, R. M., Abudullah, M. S., & Subahan, T. (2011). Student learning style and preferences for the promotion of metacognitive development activities in science class. World Applied Sciences Journal, 14, 11-16.
Rugg, D. (2010). An introduction to triangulation. UNAIDS Monitoring and Evaluation Division.
Seman, S. C., Yusoff, W. M. W., & Embong, R. (2017). Teachers’ challenges in teaching and learning for higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in Primary School. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 7(7), 534-545. http://doi.org/10.18488/journal.1.2017.77.534.545.
Stanton, J. D., Neider, X. N., Gallegos, I. J. & Clark, N. C. (2015). Differences in metacognitive regulation in introductory biology students: when prompts are not enough. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0135
Stephanou, G. & Mpiontini, M. H. (2017). Metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation in self-regulatory learning style, and in its effects on performance expectation and subsequent performance across diverse school subjects. Psychology, 8, 1941-1975. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.812125
Sulaiman, T., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2009). Perspectives of science teaching: comparison between western Australian teachers and Malaysian teachers. International Journal of Learning, 16(2), 63-76. http:// doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i02/46112
Sulaiman, T., Baki, R., & Abdul Rahim, S. S. (2011). Perspectives of learning science effectively: Comparison between western Australian teachers and Malaysian teachers. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 19(1), 1-15.
Sumintono, B. (2015, October 31). Science education in Malaysia: challenge in the 21st century [Paper Presentation]. 1st International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE), Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Thienngam, S., Promlek, A., & Thongsaard, K. (2020). Influence of teachers’ metacognitive skills on development of early-childhood students. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(1), 19-30.
Tsapali, M., Paes, T. M., & Ellefson, M. R. (2020). Researching cognitive development in primary schools: methods and practical considerations. Journal of the Chartered College of Teaching, 18.
Ucak, E. (2019). “Science teaching and science teachers” from students’ point of view. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(2), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.1.221
Weil, L. G., Fleming, S. M., Dumontheil, I., Kilford, E. J., Weil, R. S., Rees, G., Dolan, R. J., & Blakemore, S. J. (2013). The development of metacognitive ability in adolescence. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 264-271. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.01.004
Zohar, A., & Barzilai, S. (2015). Metacognition and teaching higher order thinking (HOT) in science education: students’ thinking, teachers’ knowledge, and instructional practices. In R. Wegerif, L. Li & J. Kaufman (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of research on teaching thinking (pp. 229-242). Routledge.