Aitchison, C., Kamler, B., & Lee, A. (2010). Publishing pedagogies for the doctorate and beyond. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203860960

Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2010). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004406155

Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In J.C Smart (Ed), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp.397-456) Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4512-3_8

Baker, V. L., & Lattuca, L. R. (2010). Developmental networks and learning: Toward an interdisciplinary perspective on identity development during doctoral study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 807- 827. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903501887

Bao, Y., Kehm, B. M., & Ma, Y. (2018). From product to process. The reform of doctoral education in Europe and China. Studies in Higher Education, 43(3), 524–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1182481

Barnacle, R., & Mewburn, I. (2010). Learning networks and the journey of ‘becoming doctor’. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 433-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903131214

Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., & Schoenemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x

Bernstein, B. L., Evans, B., Fyffe, J., Halai, N., Hall, F. L., Marsh, H., & Jensen, H. S. (2014). The continuing evolution of the research doctorate. In M. Nerad & B. Evans (Eds.), Globalization and its impacts on the quality of PhD education: Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide (pp. 5-30). Sense Publishers.

Bourner, T., Bowden, R., & Laing, S. (2001). Professional doctorates in England. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070124819

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Caffarella, R. S., & Barnett, B. G. (2000). Teaching doctoral students to become scholarly writers: The importance of giving and receiving critiques. Studies in Higher Education, 25(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/030750700116000

Carter, S., & Kumar, V. (2017). ‘Ignoring me is part of learning’: Supervisory feedback on doctoral writing. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(1), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2015.1123104

Cherrstrom, C. A. (2012). Making connections: Attending professional conferences. Adult Learning, 23(3), 148-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159512452263

Chong, Z. S., & Clohisey, S. (2020). How to build a well‐rounded CV and get hired after your PhD. The FEBS Journal, 288(10), 3072-3081. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15635

Christensen, M., Dyrstad, J. M., & Innstrand, S. T. (2020). Academic work engagement, resources and productivity: Empirical evidence with policy implications. Studies in Higher Education, 45(1), 86-99. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1517304

Chung, J. Y., & Petrick, J. (2011). Doctoral students' research productivity: An analysis of publications in tourism and hospitality journals. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sports and Tourism Education 10(1), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.3794/johlste.101.303  

Coronel Llamas, J. M., & Boza, A. (2011). Teaching research methods for doctoral students in education: Learning to enquire in the university. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2010.492136  

Daniel, B., Kumar, V., & Omar, N. (2017). Postgraduate conception of research methodology: Implications for learning and teaching. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(2), 220-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2017.1283397

Deem, R., & Brehony, K. (2000). Doctoral students’ access to research cultures–are some         more      unequal than others? Studies in Higher Education 25(2), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696138

Devos, C., Van der Linden, N., Boudrenghien, G., Azzi, A., Frenay, M., Galand, B., & Klein, O. (2015). Doctoral supervision in the light of the three types of support promoted in self-determination theory. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 439–464. https://doi.org/10.28945/2308  

Dowsett, L. (2020). Global university rankings and strategic planning: A case study of Australian institutional performance. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(4), 478-494. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1701853  

Emmioğlu, E., McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2017). Doctoral students’ experiences of feeling (or not) like an academic. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 12, 73– 90. https://doi.org/10.28945/3727

Gardner, S. K. (2008). “What's too much and what's too little?”: The process of becoming an    independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326-350.   https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772101

Ghosh, R., & Githens, R. P. (2009). Application of social network theory: Doctoral students’ experiences in conferences. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 23(1), 25-28. https://doi.org/10.1002/nha3.10326

Goldman, Z. W., & Goodboy, A. K. (2017). Explaining doctoral students’ relational maintenance with their advisor: A psychosocial development perspective. Communication Education, 66(1), 70-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1202996

González-Ocampo, G., & Castelló, M. (2019). How do doctoral students experience supervision?. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(3), 293-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1520208   

Granata, S. N., & Dochy, F. (2016). Applied PhD research in a work-based environment: An activity theory-based analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 41(6), 990-1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.966666

Greer, D. A., Cathcart, A., & Neale, L. (2016). Helping doctoral students teach: Transitioning     to early career academia through cognitive apprenticeship. Higher Education     Research & Development, 35(4), 712-726.        https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1137873

Gu, J., Lin, Y., Vogel, D., & Tian, W. (2011). What are the major impact factors on research performance of young doctorate holders in science in China: A USTC survey. Higher Education, 62(4), 483-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9400-0

Hey-Cunningham, A. J., Ward, M. H., & Miller, E. J. (2021). Making the most of feedback for academic writing development in postgraduate research: Pilot of a combined programme for students and supervisors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1714472

Jazvac-Martek, M., Chen, S., & McAlpine, L. (2011). Tracking the doctoral student experience over time: Cultivating agency in diverse spaces. In L. McAlpine L. & C. Amundsen (Eds.), Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators (pp. 17-36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0507-4_2

Johnston, L., Sampson, K., Comer, K., & Brog, E. (2016). Using Doctoral Experience Survey Data to Support Developments in Postgraduate Supervision and Support. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 185–203. https://doi.org/10.28945/3505

Jung, J. (2018). Learning experience and perceived competencies of doctoral students in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9530-0

Kingsley, L., & Romine, R. (2014). Measuring teaching best practice in the induction years: Development and validation of an item-level assessment. European Journal of Educational Research, 3(2), 87-109. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.3.2.87  

Kobayashi, S., Grout, B. W., & Rump, C. Ø. (2015). Opportunities to learn scientific thinking in joint doctoral supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(1), 41-51. http://.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.981837

Kuzhabekova, A., & Temerbayeva, A. (2018). The role of conferences in doctoral student socialization, Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 9(2), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-D-18-00012

Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2013). Research Policy and Academic Performativity:         Compliance, Contestation and Complicity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1162– 1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.833025

Lee, A., & Murray, R. (2015). Supervising writing: Helping postgraduate students develop as   researchers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 558-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.866329

Lei, J., & Hu, G. (2015). Apprenticeship in Scholarly Publishing: A Student Perspective on Doctoral Supervisors’ Roles. Publications, 3(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3010027

Lewthwaite, S., & Nind, M. (2016). Teaching research methods in the social sciences: Expert perspectives on pedagogy and practice. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(4), 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2016.1197882

Lindahl, J., Colliander, C., & Danell, R. (2020). Early career performance and its correlation with gender and publication output during doctoral education. Scientometrics, 122(1), 309-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03262-1

Lovitts, B. E. (2005). Introduction of an online approach to flexible learning for on-campus and distance education students: Lessons learned and ways forward. Nurse Education Today, 29(2), 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2008.08.010

Lovitts, B. E. (2008). The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn't, and why? The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 296-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2008.11772100

Macfarlane, B. (2017). Publication and Performativity. In G. A. Postiglione & J. Jung (Eds.), The changing academic profession in Hong Kong: Governance, productivity, and global integration (pp. 97–108). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56791-4_5

Mantai, L. (2017). Feeling like a researcher: Experiences of early doctoral students in Australia. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 636-650. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1067603

Mantai, L. (2019). “Feeling more academic now”: Doctoral stories of becoming an academic. The Australian Educational Researcher, 46(1), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0283-x

McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2009). Identity and agency: Pleasures and collegiality among   the challenges of the doctoral journey. Studies in Continuing Education, 31(2), 109-125.   https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370902927378

McAlpine, L., Paulson, J., Gonsalves, A., & Jazvac-Martek, M. (2012). Untold doctoral stories: Can we move beyond cultural narratives of neglect? Higher Education            Research and Development, 31(4), 511-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.559199

McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590979

Meeuwisse, M., Severiens, S. E., & Born, M. P. (2010). Learning environment, ınteraction, sense of belonging and study success in ethnically diverse student groups. Research in Higher Education, 51(6), 528–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-010-9168-1

Mercer, T., Kythreotis, A., Lambert, C., & Hughes, G. (2011). Student-led research training within the PhD: PhD experience conferences. International Journal for Researcher Development, 2(2), 152-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511111212736 

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

 Odena, O., & Burgess, H. (2017). How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: A qualitative approach. Studies in Higher Education, 42(3), 572-590. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1063598

Onwuegbuzie, A., & Leech, N. (2005). Taking the ‘Q’ out of research: Teaching research methodology courses without the divide between quantitative and qualitative paradigms. Quality & Quantity, 39(3), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-004-1670-0

Orellana, M. L., Darder, A., Pérez, A., & Salinas, J. (2016). Improving doctoral success by matching PhD students with supervisors. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 87-103. https://doi.org/10.28945/3404

Overall, N. C., Deane, K. L., & Peterson, E. R. (2011). Promoting doctoral students' research      self-efficacy: Combining academic guidance with autonomy support. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 791-805.        https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.535508

Park, J. J., & Schallert, D. L. (2020). Reciprocity between doctoral students' emerging professional identity and their environment of a possible future self in real and imagined communities of practice. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100434

Raddon, A. E. (2011). A changing environment: Narratives of learning about research. International Journal for Researcher Development, 2(1), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/17597511111178005

Ross, K., Dennis, B., Zhao, P., & Li, P. (2017). Exploring graduate students’ understanding of research: Links between ıdentity and research conceptions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 73-86.

Sala-Bubaré, A., & Castelló, M. (2018). Writing regulation processes in higher education: A review of two decades of empirical research. Reading and Writing, 31(4), 757-777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9808-3

Sefotho, M. M. (2018). Carving a career identity as PhD supervisor: A South African auto ethnographic case study. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 539-557. https://doi.org/10.28945/4159

Shin, J. C., Kim, S. J., Kim, E., & Lim, H. (2018). Doctoral students’ satisfaction in a research-focused Korean university: Socio-environmental and motivational factors. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19(2), 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9528-7

Silverman, D. (2020). Introducing qualitative research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research (pp.3-16). Sage Publications Limited.

Wang, T., & Li, L. Y. (2011). ‘Tell me what to do’ vs ‘guide me through it’: Feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active learning in higher education, 12(2), 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411402438

Weidman, J. C. (2020). Conceptualizing student socialization in higher education: An ıntellectual journey. In J. C. Weidman & L. DeAngelo (Eds.), Socialization in higher education and the early career (Vol 7., pp.11-28). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33350-8_2

Weng, T. H. (2020). On becoming a doctoral student: Chinese doctoral students’ socialization of capital and habitus in academia. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 41(4), 555-573. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2020.1745056

Wolff-Micheal, R., & Daniel, L. (2002). Scientific investigations, metaphorical gestures, and the emergence of abstract scientific concepts. Learning and Instruction, 12(3): 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00023-8