Albe, V. (2015). Science for citizenship. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 904–905). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0

Alcíbar, M. (2015). Comunicación pública de la ciencia y la tecnología: una aproximación crítica a su historia conceptual [Public communication of science and technology: a critical approach to its conceptual history]. Arbor, 191(773), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2015.773n3012

Alsop, S., & Bencze, L. (2014). Activism! Toward a more radical science and technology education. In J. Bencze & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist science and technology education (pp. 1-19). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4360-1_1

Bauer, M. W. (2017). No time for experts? Trust in science after the BREXIT vote of 23 June 2016. In B. Schiele & J. LeMarec (Eds.), Cultures of Science (pp. 91-99). Acfas.

Bauman, Z. (2013). Culture in a liquid modern world. John Wiley & Sons.

Bauman, Z. (2015). Los retos de la educación en la modernidad líquida [The challenges of education in liquid modernity]. Editorial Gedisa.

Bencze, L., Carter, L., Groleau, A., Krstovic, M., Levinson, R., Martin, J., Martins, E., Pouliot, C., & Weinstein, M. (2019). Promoting students’ critical and active engagement in socio-scientific problems: inter-trans-national perspectives. In E. McLoughlin, O. Finlayson, S. Erduran & P. Childs. (Eds.). Bridging research and practice in science education. Contributions from science education research (pp. 171-188). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17219-0_11

Bybee, R. (2015). Scientific literacy. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0_178

Cairns, R. (2020). Recognizing, reproducing and resisting West as method discourse: An analysis of senior secondary Asia-related history curriculum enactment. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 18(1), 211-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2020.1764413

Chevallard, Y. (1991). La transposición didáctica. Del saber sabio al saber enseñado [The didactic transposition. From wise knowledge to taught knowledge]. Aique.

Colucci-Gray, L., Burnard, P., Gray, D., & Cooke, C. (2019). A critical review of STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics). In P. Thomson (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of education (pp. 1-26). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093 .013.398

Cortassa, C. (2016). In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? The eternal recurrence of the public deficit. Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 447-459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629745

Cotton, D. R. E., Zhai, J., Miller, W., Dalla-Valle, L., & Winter, J. (2021). Reducing energy demand in China and the United Kingdom: the importance of energy literacy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278(1), 123876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123876

Díaz-Moreno, N., & Jiménez-Liso, R. (2014). Las controversias sociocientíficas como contexto en la enseñanza de las ciencias [Socio-scientific controversies as a context in science education]. In M. A. de las Heras, A. Lorca, B. Vázquez, A. M. Wamba & R. Jiménez (Eds.), Actas del XXVI Encuentros Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales (pp. 693-701). Departamento de Educación, Universidad de Almería. https://bit.ly/3ocLupB

Dorfman, E. (2019). Changing epistemologies in the museum: An evolving relationship with nature. Museum International, 71(1-2), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13500775.2019.1638024

Ferreira, A. (2020). Dilemmas, conflicts, and worldview diversity: Exploring the relevance of Clare Grave’s legacy for planning practice and education. Journal of Planning Education and Research. Advance online publication https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X20940797

Freire, P. (2010). Pedagogía del compromiso [Pedagogy of commitment]. Hipatia.

Goldenberg, M. (2016). Public misunderstanding of science? Reframing the problem of vaccine hesitancy. Perspectives on Science, 24(5), 552-581. https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00223

Gupta, A. (2020). Preparing teachers in a pedagogy of third space: A postcolonial approach to contextual and sustainable early childhood teacher education. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2019.1692108

Hardy, G. H. (2005). A mathematician's apology. University of Alberta Mathematical Sciences Society. https://binged.it/3qIk1PD

Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Blackwell.

Janes, R. R., & Sandell, R. (Eds.). (2019). Museum activism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351251044

Jooste, N., & Heleta, S. (2017). Global citizenship versus globally competent graduates: A critical view from the South. Journal of Studies in International Education, 21(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315316637341

Jung, J.-H. (2018). Decolonizing educational/curriculum studies in East Asia: Problematizing shadow education in South Korea. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 19(2), 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2018.1463074

Kim, H. K., & Kim, Y. (2019). Risk information seeking and processing about particulate air pollution in South Korea: The roles of cultural worldview. Risk Analysis, 39(5), 1071-1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13231

Kreimer, P. (2015). Public understanding of science and social studies of science: convergence or parallel paths? In B. Schiele, J. Le Marec & P. Baranger (Eds.), Science Communication Today. Current Strategies and Means of Action (pp. 83-98). Presses Universitaires.

Kreimer, P. (2017). Los estudios sociales de la ciencia y la tecnología: ¿son parte de las ciencias sociales? [Social studies of science and technology: are they part of the Social Sciences?]. Teknokultura, 14(1), 143-162. http://doi.org/10.5209/TEKN.55727

Kreimer, P., & Vessuri, H. (2018). Latin American science, technology, and society: a historical and reflexive approach. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 1(1), 17-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2017.1368622

Kumar, A. (2019). Curriculum as a process of conditioning in Asia: Ideology, politics, and religion. In A. Kumar (Ed.), Curriculum in International Contexts (pp. 113-149). Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01983-9_5

Kumar, P. V. S. (2016). Social Sciences in the public understanding of science. Journal of Scientific Temper, 4(3-4), 167-187. https://binged.it/3bPYj3F

Larkin, D.-B. (2019). Attending to the public understanding of science education: A response to Furtak and Penuel. Science Education, (103), 1294-1300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21537

Lyall, C., & Tait, J. (2019). Beyond the limits to governance: New rules of engagement for the tentative governance of the life sciences. Research Policy, 48(5), 1128-1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.009

Makkreel, R. A. (2021, June 15). Wilhelm Dilthey. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://stanford.io/30cUUcX

Maleki, F., & Davari, R. (2020). The concept of humanities in the late thought of Wilhelm Dilthey. Occidental Studies, 10(2), 219-242. https://bit.ly/3C0vegq

Martins, I. P. (2020). Revisitando orientações CTS|CTSA na educação e no ensino das ciências [Reviewing STS|STSE Guidelines in Education and Science Teaching]. APEduC Revista - Investigação e Práticas em Educação em Ciências, Matemática e Tecnologia, 1(1), 13-29. http://hdl.handle.net/10773/31870

Naugle, D. K. (2002). Worldview: The history of a concept. Eerdmans Publishing.

Nery, J. A. (2020). La epistemología social de Thomas Popkewitz [The social epistemology of Thomas Popkewitz]. Perfiles Educativos, 42(170), 154-168. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2020.170.59321

Nielsen, K. H. (2018). Ideas, politics and practices of integrated science teaching in the global Cold War. BJHS Themes, 3, 167-189. https://doi.org/10.1017/bjt.2018.1

Nikolaeva, A. D., Filin, S. A., & Davaasurengiyn, D. (2019). Modern teacher’s worldview and ethics in the context of technological paradigms (case study of a national region of Russia). In V. Mantulenko (Ed.), SHS Web of Conferences, 71 (pp. 05005). https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20197105005

Orozco, C. E. (2018). Diez años de investigación de la comunicación pública de la ciencia en y desde América Latina. Un estudio en tres revistas académicas (2008-2017) [Ten years of research on the public communication of science in and from Latin America. A study in three academic journals (2008-2017)]. Journal of Science Communication, América Latina, 1(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.22323/3.01010202

Park, J. (2017). Knowledge production with Asia-centric research methodology. Comparative Education Review, 61(4), 760-779. https://doi.org/10.1086/693980

Pedretti, E., & Iannini, A. M. N. (2021). Towards fourth-generation science museums: Changing goals, changing roles. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 20(4), 700–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-020-00128-0

Pestre, D., & Bonneuil, C. (2015). Histoire des sciences et des savoirs, t. 3: le siècle des technosciences [History of science and knowledge, vol. 3: the century of Technosciences]. Le Seuil. https://bit.ly/3qygPGr

Piaget, J., & García, R. (1982). Psicogénesis e historia de la ciencia [Psychogenesis and history of science]. Siglo XXI.

Popkewitz, T. (1994). Política, conocimiento y poder: algunas cuestiones para el estudio de las reformas educativas [Politics, knowledge and power: some issues for the study of educational reforms sychogenesis and history of science]. Revista de Educación, 305(1), 1-29. https://binged.it/3BVGFpQ

Popkewitz, T. S., & Huang, J. (2021). Rethinking critical theory and the study of education: contributions of the ‘Posts/New Materialism’. In R. Tierney, F. Rizvi, K. Ercikan & G. Smith (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 1-24). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.99528

Rahmawati, L. (2016). Teaching language and world vision: As a cross-cultural communication. Educatio: Journal of Education, 1(2), 171-188. https://core.ac.uk/reader/229765773

Sanz-Merino, N., & Tarhuni-Navarro, D. H. (2019). Attitudes and perceptions of Conacyt researchers towards public communication of science and technology. Public Understanding of Science, 28(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518781466

Schwinger, J. S. (2002). Einstein's legacy: the unity of space and time. Courier Corporation.

Seakins, A., & Hobson, M. (2017). Public understanding of science. In K. S. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science education. New directions in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 443-452). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_32

Seethaler, S., Evans, J. H., Gere, C., & Rajagopalan, R. M. (2019). Science, values, and science communication: Competencies for pushing beyond the deficit model. Science Communication, 41(3), 378-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019847484

Sharma, N. (2018). Global citizenship education and Non-Western perspectives. In N. Sharma (Ed.), Value-creating global citizenship education (pp. 43-55). Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78244-7_3

Shih, Y.-H. (2018). Some critical thinking on Paulo Freire’s critical pedagogy and its educational implications. International Education Studies, 11(9), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n9p64

Simis, M. J., Madden, H., Cacciatore, M. A., & Yeo, S. K. (2016). The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Public Understanding of Science, 25(4), 400-414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516629749

Simonneaux, L. (2014). From promoting the techno-sciences to activism – a variety of objectives involved in the teaching of SSIs. In L. Bencze & S. Alsop (Eds.), Activist Science and Technology Education (pp. 99-111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4360-1_6

Singh, S., & Singh, S. (2016). What is scientific literacy: A review paper. International Journal of Academic Research and Development, 1(2), 15-20. https://bit.ly/3ETpgji

Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. Dori, Z. Mevarech & D. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education. Innovations in science education and technology (pp. 65-88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_4

Smallman, M. (2014). Public understanding of science in turbulent times III: Deficit to dialogue, champions to critics. Public Understanding of Science, 25(2), 186-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514549141

Southerland, S. A., & Settlage, J. (2019). An invitation into an ongoing conversation: Revealing different perspectives on some of the fundamental assumptions of the work of science educators. Science Education, 103(5), 1277-1279. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21539

Sverdlick, I. (2019). Inclusión educativa y derecho a la educación: La disputa de los sentidos [Educational inclusion and the right to education: The senses in dispute]. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 27(26), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.3197

Thuillier, P. (1990). De Arquímedes a Einstein: las caras ocultas de la invención científica [From Archimedes to Einstein: the hidden faces of scientific reasearch]. Alianza Editorial.

Tomasevski, K. (2004). El asalto a la educación [The assault on education]. Intermon Oxfam.

Underhill, J. (2009). Humboldt, worldview and language. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748638420.001.0001

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives. UNESCO. https://binged.it/3wumUnT

Von Korff, J. (2016). Secondary analysis of teaching methods in introductory physics: A 50 k-student study. American Journal of Physics, 84, 969-974. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4964354

Wang, C., & Hoffman, D. M. (2016). Are we the world? A critical reflection on selfhood in US global citizenship education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(56), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2152

Zeng, J., Jiang, M., & Yuan, M. (2020). Environmental risk perception, risk culture, and pro-environmental behavior. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1750. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051750