Slovenian Primary School Teachers' Opinion on Interdisciplinary Approach Between Fine Art and Science Education
In this article we present research on Slovenian primary school teachers' opinion about the interdisciplinary approach between fine art and scienc.
- Pub. date: January 15, 2022
- Pages: 435-443
- 469 Downloads
- 790 Views
- 2 Citations
In this article we present research on Slovenian primary school teachers' opinion about the interdisciplinary approach between fine art and science education. With the help of questionnaires, interviews, and analysis of lesson plans, we determined how primary school teachers use this type of interdisciplinary approach, how often and what their views are. We included 138 primary school teachers from every region in Slovenia. It turned out that primary school teachers in Slovenia use an interdisciplinary approach between fine art and science teaching quite often and consider it useful to achieve different aspects of pupils' development. The study revealed that most teachers find it difficult to consider the educational goals of both fields (fine art, science). They often use the connection between the subjects only on an associative level - they only mention the teaching content of one subject quickly and carelessly, without making meaningful connections and without achieving the goals of both subjects. Content taught in this way cannot be considered a cross-curricular approach in the subject sense.
fine art interdisciplinary approach teacher opinion science wholesome teaching of concepts
Keywords: Fine art, interdisciplinary approach, teacher’ opinion, science, wholesome teaching of concepts.
References
Barton, J., & Haslett, T. (2007). Analysis, Synthesis, Systems Thinking and the Scientific Method: Rediscovering the Importance of Open Systems. Systems Research and Behavioural Science, 24(2), 143 – 155. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.816
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum Integration: designing the core of democratic education. Teachers College Press.
Bopegedera, A. M. R. P. (2005). The art and science of light: an interdisciplinary teaching and learning experience. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p55
Bowie, A., & Cassim, F. (2016). Linking classroom and community: a theoretical alignment of service learning and a human-centered design methodology in contemporary communication design education. Education as Change, 20(1), 126–148. https://doi.org/10.17159/1947-9417/2016/556
Brouillette, L., & Graham, N. J. (2016). Using arts integration to make science learning memorable in the upper elementary grades: a quasi-experimental study. Journal for Learning through the Arts, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.21977/D912133442
Busta, L., & Russo, E. S. (2020). Enhancing interdisciplinary and systems thinking with an integrative plant chemistry module applied in diverse undergraduate course settings. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(12), 4406–4413. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00395
Cutting, R., & Kelly, O. (2015). Creative teaching in primary science. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473910195
Dinçol Özgür, S., & Yilmaz, A. (2017). The effect of inquiry-based learning on gifted and talented students' understanding of acids-bases concepts and motivation. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 994–1008. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.994
Eisner, E., & Powell, K. (2002). Special series on arts-based educational research: art in science? Curriculum Inquiry, 32(2), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-873X.00219
Haidman, M. M., Mahinda, R., Bull, J., Carran, T. D., & Shelton, A. (2019). The Effects of arts-integrated instruction on memory for science content. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 14(3), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2019.02.002
Halapine, S. M. (2004). Introducing molecular visualization to primary schools in california: the start! teaching science through art program. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(10), 1431–1436. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed081p1431
Jones, C. (2009). Interdisciplinary approach - advantages, disadvantages and the future benefits of interdisciplinary studies. ESSAI, 7, 76-81. https://dc.cod.edu/essai/vol7/iss1/26
Jurkovič, M. (2007). Medpredmetno povezovanje v 4. razredu pri matematiki, naravoslovju in tehniki ter družboslovju. [Interdisciplinary approach in 4th grade maths, science, technology and social studies]”. In J. Krek, T., Hodnik Čadež, J. Vogrinc, B. Sicherl-Kafol, T. Devjak & V. Štemberger (Eds.), Učitelj v vlogi raziskovalca: akcijsko raziskovanje na področjih medpredmetnega povezovanja in vzgojne zasnove v javni šoli [Teacher in a role of a researcher: action research in interdisciplinary teaching and educational design in public school] (pp. 294–313). Faculty of Education.
Kocjančič, F. N., Karim, S., Kosec, M., Opačak, Ž., Prevodnik, M., Rojc, J., Velikonja, A., Župančič, T., Kepec, M., Prevodnik, M., Tomšič Amon, B., & Selan, J. (2011). Program osnovna šola: Likovna vzgoja- učni načrt [Art education curriculum for primary schools]. National Education Institute Slovenia.
Kolar, M., Krnel, D., & Velkavrh, A. (2011). Program osnovna šola: Spoznavanje okolja- učni načrt [Knowing of the Environment: Curriculum for primary schools]. National Education Institute Slovenia.
Kandel, E. R., & Mack, S. (2003). A parallel between radical reductionism in science and in art. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1001(1), 272–249. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1279.016
Karlavaris, B., & Berce Golob, H. (1991). Likovna vzgoja. Priročnik za učitelje razrednega pouka [Fine art education. A manual for primary school teachers]. DZS.
Labianca, D. A., & Reeves, W. J. (1980). Improving 'interdisciplinary' teaching of science. Improving College and University Teaching, 28(3), 133–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1980.9927633
Lupo, S. M., Berry, A., Thacker, E., Sawyer, A., & Merritt, J. (2019). Rethinking text sets to support knowledge building and interdisciplinary learning. The Reading Teacher, 73(4), 393–548. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1869
Mesec, B. (1998). Uvod v kvalitativno raziskovanje v socialnem delu [An introduction to qualitative research in social work]. Faculty of social work.
Maison, M., Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Dewi Prisma, U., & Kartina, L. (2019). Analysis of science process skills in physics education students. Journal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.28123
McBride, E., Wyatt Oswald, W., Beck, L. A., & Vashlishan Murray, A. (2020). “I'm just not that great at science” Science self-efficacy in arts and communication students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(4), 597–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21603
Mills, K. A., & Doyle, K. (2019). Visual arts: a multimodal language for Indigenous education. Language and Education, 33(6), 521–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2019.1635618
Milekšič, V. (1992). Didaktična prenova razredne stopnje osnovne šole. Integrirani pouk. Prvi del: Načrtovanje didaktičnega pristopa [Didactic renewal of the primary school grade level. Integrated lesson. Part One: Planning a Didactic Approach]. National Education Institute Slovenia.
Mutlu, F., & Nacaroğlu, O. (2019). “Examination of perceptions of gifted students about climate change and global warming.” Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(5), 780–792. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.780
Ozer Aytekin, K. (2020). Analysis of science images presence in cartoons (A Turkish TV channel case). European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1347–1366. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1347
Pavlin, J., & Čampa, T. (2021). Is peer instruction in primary school feasible?: The case study in Slovenia. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.785
Petek, T., & Lazzarich, M. (2019). “The attitudes of Slovenian and Croatian students of primary education towards spoken performance in the pedagogical process. XLinguae, 12(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2019.12.01.01
Potočnik, R., & Devetak, I. (2018). The differences between pre-service chemistry, fine art, and primary education teachers regarding interest and knowledge about fine art materials. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.352
Purcell Cone, T., Werner, P., & Cone, S. L. (2009). Interdisciplinary elementary physical education; connecting, sharing, partnering. Human kinetics.
Ravanis, K. (2017). Early childhood science education: state of the art and perspectives. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(3), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/17.16.284
Sicherl Kafol, B. (2007). Procesni in vsebinski vidiki medpredmetnega povezovanja. [Process and content view on interdisciplinary approach]. In J. Krek, T., Hodnik Čadež, J. Vogrinc, B. Sicherl-Kafol, T. Devjak & V. Štemberger (Eds.), Učitelj v vlogi raziskovalca: akcijsko raziskovanje na področjih medpredmetnega povezovanja in vzgojne zasnove v javni šoli [Teacher in a role of a researcher: action research in interdisciplinary teaching and educational design in public school] (pp. 112–129). Faculty of Education.
Štemberger, V. (2007). Načrtovanje in izvajanje medpredmetnih povezav [Planning and executing interdisciplinary lessons]. In J. Krek, T., Hodnik Čadež, J. Vogrinc, B. Sicherl-Kafol, T. Devjak & V. Štemberger (Eds.), Učitelj v vlogi raziskovalca: akcijsko raziskovanje na področjih medpredmetnega povezovanja in vzgojne zasnove v javni šoli [Teacher in a role of a researcher: action research in interdisciplinary teaching and educational design in public school] (pp. 93–111). Faculty of Education.
Tacol, T. (2003). Likovno izražanje: didaktična izhodišča za problemski pouk likovne vzgoje v devetletni osnovni šoli. [Artistic expression: didactic starting points for fine art classes in primary and elementary school]. Debora.
Tacol, T., & Šupšakova, B. (2019). Likovni razvoj in simbol v vizualni komunikaciji otroka [Visual development and symbol in the visual communication of the child]. Debora.
Tamir, A. (2000). Interaction between art & science. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 78(1), 271–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.5450780135
Tetikci, I., Erim, G., & Halaclar, B. B. (2021). The place and effects of technology in the visual arts course. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1089–1100. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1089
Vodopivec, I., Gostinčar Blagotinšek, A., & Skribe Dimec, D. (2011). Program osnovna šola: naravoslovje in tehnika: učni načrt [Science and Technology: Curriculum for primary school]. National Education Institute Slovenia.
Vogrinc, J. (2008). Kvalitativno raziskovanje na pedagoškem področju [Qualitative research in pedagogics]. Faculty of Education.
Wenham, M. (1998). Art and science in education: The common ground. The International Journal of Art & Design Education, 17(1), 61 – 70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5949.00106