Students’ Perceptions of an Intervention Course Designed to Raise Science-Related Career Awareness
Regina Soobard
,
Tormi Kotkas
,
Jack Holbrook
,
Miia Rannikmae
This longitudinal study focuses on evaluating grade 7-9 school students’ perceptions of intervention modules intended to be relevant, as well as.
- Pub. date: October 15, 2020
- Pages: 1539-1555
- 679 Downloads
- 1342 Views
- 3 Citations
This longitudinal study focuses on evaluating grade 7-9 school students’ perceptions of intervention modules intended to be relevant, as well as promoting learning attributes to raise awareness of science-related careers. Students are taught through six purposely developed and designed career-related teaching–learning modules (C-TLMs). Each module is initiated by means of a career-related scenario, followed up by promoting conceptual science learning plus drawing attention to careers to which each module intends to relate. Student perceptions are obtained by means of a questionnaire after each module with respect to its relevance and also the mean by which the learning environment raise interest, enjoyment and motivation associated with career awareness. Outcomes show that, in general, students participating in this study agree that the developed C-TLMs are relevant and students value the learning experienced through the different module contexts. Nevertheless, student appreciation of the specific inclusion of career awareness components in the modules is mixed.
career based teaching learning module c tlm learning environment attributes relevance science related career awareness
Keywords: Career-based teaching-learning module (C-TLM), learning environment attributes, relevance, science-related career awareness.
References
Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & Willis, B. (2014). Adolescent boys’ science aspirations: Masculinity, capital, and power. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 1–30.
Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., Gijbels, D. & van Keulen, H. (2015). Students attitudes towards technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(1), 43-65.
Aschbacher, P.R., Li, E., & Roth, E.J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564–582.
Bolte, C., Streller, S., Holbrook, J., Rannikmae, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok Naaman, R., & Rauch, F. (2012). Introduction to the PROFILES project and its philosophy. In C. Bolte, J. Holbrook & F. Rauch (Eds.), Inquiry-based science education in Europe: Reflections from the PROFILES project (pp. 31-41). University of Klagenfurt.
Brophy, J. (1999). Perspectives of classroom management: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In H. J. Freiberg & J. E. Brophy (Eds.), Beyond behaviourism: changing the classroom management paradigm (pp. 43-56). Allyn & Bacon.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press.
Bybee, R., & McCrae, B. (2011). Scientific literacy and student attitudes: Perspectives from PISA 2006 science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 7-26.
Cermik, H., & Fenli-Aktan, A. (2020). Primary school students’ attitudes towards science. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(2), 355-365. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.2.355
Changtong, N., Maneejak, N., & Yasri, P. (2020). Approaches for implementing STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics) activities among middle school students in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(1), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.1.185
Chen, S., Sun, H., Zhu, X., & Chen, A. (2014). Relationship between motivation and learning in physical education and after-school physical activity. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85(4), 468-477.
Cohen, C., & Patterson, D. G. (2012). Teaching strategies that promote science career awareness. Northwest association for biomedical research monograph. https://www.nwabr.org/resources/general-resources/publications.
Deci, E. L (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behaviour: A self-determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43-70). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dinh, D.H., & Nguyen, Q.L. (2020). The involvement of gender in STEM training for teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 363-373. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.363
Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 1-42). Cambridge University Press.
European Commission. (2015). Does the EU need more SCIENCE-RELATED-graduates? Final Report. Publications Office of the European Union.
Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of “context” in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957-976.
Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M., & Pilot, A. (2011). Concept development and transfer in context-based science education. International Journal of Science Education, 33(6), 817-837.
Hasanah, U. (2020). Key definitions of STEM education: Literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 16(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/ 10.29333/ijese/8336
Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549–571.
Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(4), 465–483.
Hidi, S., & Renniger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Holbrook, J. (2008). Introduction to the Special Issue of Science Education International devoted to PARSEL. Science Education International, 19(3), 257-266.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). Nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347−1362.
Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific literacy. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 275−288.
Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2010). Contextualisation, de-contextualisation, re-contextualisation - A science teaching approach to enhance meaningful learning for scientific literacy. In I. Eilks, & B. Ralle (Eds.), Contemporary science education (pp. 69−82). Shaker Verlag.
Holbrook, J. & Rannikmae, M. (2014). The philosophy and approach on which the PROFILES project is based. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 4(1), 9−21.
Holbrook, J., Rannikmae, M., Reiska, P., & Ilsley, P. (Eds). (2008). The need for a paradigm shift in science education for post-soviet societies. Peter Lang Verlag.
Julia, J., Subarjah, H., Maulana, M., Sujana, A., Isrokatun, I., Nugraha, D., & Rachmatin, D. (2020). Readiness and competence of new teachers for career as professional teachers in primary schools. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 655-673. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.655
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383-434). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kukla, A. (2000). Social constructivism and the philosophy of science. Philosophical issues in science. Routledge.
Kotkas, T., Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2017). A Theory-based instrument to evaluate motivational triggers perceived by students in STEM career-related scenarios. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(6), 836-854.
Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 27-50.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Levitt, K. E. (2001). An analysis of elementary teachers’ beliefs regarding the teaching and learning of science. Science Education, 86,1-22.
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education, 95(5), 877-907.
Margot, K.C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(2), 1-16.
Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436.
National Research Council. (2013). Next generation sciences standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18290
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results (Vol. 1). Excellence and equity in education. OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Publishing.
Peasland, E.L., Henri, D.C., Morrell, L.J., & Scott, G.W. (2019). The influence of fieldwork design on student perceptions of skills development during field course. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2369-2388.
Potvin, P., & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude towards science and technology at K-12 levels: A systematic review of 12 years of educational research. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 85-129.
Reeve, J. (1996). Motivating others: Nurturing inner motivational re-sources. Allyn & Bacon.
Renninger, K.A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Erlbaum.
Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 373–404). Academic Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(2), 54–67.
Sadler, T., D., & Zeidler, D., L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socio scientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71–93.
Salonen, A., Kärkkäinen, S., & Keinonen, T. (2018). Career-related instruction promoting students’ career awareness and interest towards science learning. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 19(2), 474–483.
Sjoberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project. An overview and key findings. University of Oslo.
Soobard, R. (2015). A study of gymnasium students’ scientific literacy development based on determinants of cognitive learning outcomes and self-perception (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Tartu University Press.
Subotnik, R. F., Tai, R. H., & Rickoff, R. (2010). Specialized public high schools of science, mathematics, and technology and the STEM pipeline: What do we know now and what will we know in 5 years? Roeper Review, 32, 7-16.
Stipek, D. (2002). Good instruction is motivating. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), A Vol. in the educational psychology series. Development of achievement motivation (pp. 309–332). Academic Press.
Teppo, M. & Rannikmae, M. (2008). Paradigm shift for teachers: More relevant science teaching. In Holbrook, J., Rannikmae, M., Reiska, P. & Ilsley, P. (Eds.), The need for a paradigm shift in science education for post-soviet societies (pp. 25−46). Peter Lang Verlag.
Tytler, R., & Osborne, J. (2012). Student attitudes and aspirations towards science, In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education, (pp. 597–625). Springer.
Ucak, E. (2019). “Science teaching and science teachers” from students’ point of view. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(2), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.1.221
Vaismoradi, M., & Snelgrove, S. (2019). Theme in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376.
Van Aalsvoort, J. (2004). Logical positivism as a tool to analyse the problem of chemistry’s lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1151–1168.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.
Wigfield, A & Eccles, J.S. (ed.) (2002). Development of achievement motivation. Academic Press.
Wigfield, A., Cambria, J., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Motivation in education. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 463–478). Oxford University Press.