Teachers’ Topic-Specific Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Driver in Understanding Graphs in Dynamics of Market
Understanding graphs in the dynamics of market (DM) is a challenge to learners; its teaching demands a specific kind of teacher’s knowledge. Thi.
- Pub. date: July 15, 2024
- Online Pub. date: April 20, 2024
- Pages: 1247-1262
- 213 Downloads
- 628 Views
- 0 Citations
Understanding graphs in the dynamics of market (DM) is a challenge to learners; its teaching demands a specific kind of teacher’s knowledge. This study aims to examine the topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge (TSPCK) of experienced economics teachers in teaching graphs in DM to enhance learners’ understanding of the topic. It reports using a qualitative approach underpinned by the TSPCK framework for teaching specific topics developed by Mavhunga. Data were collected through classroom observations and analyzed thematically using a case study of two economics teachers. The study revealed that adopting a step-by-step approach and the use of worked graphical examples promote an understanding of graphs in DM. It also established that active learning is preferable to the predominant chalk-and-talk (lecture) method of teaching graphs in DM. The study proposed a Dynamics of Market Graphical Framework (DMG-Framework) to enable teachers, particularly pre-service teachers in lesson delivery, to enhance learners’ understanding of graphs in DM. The result of this study will broaden the international view in the teaching of graphs in DM.
Keywords: Dynamics of market, economics teachers, graphs, topic-specific pedagogical content knowledge.
References
Ada, T., & Kurtuluş, A. (2010). Students’ misconceptions and errors in transformation geometry. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 41(7), 901-909. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2010.486451
Agnes, D., Kaniawati, I., & Danawan, D. A. (2015). Analisis deskriptif tes tiga tingkat materi optika geometri dan alat optik [Descriptive analysis three-tier test geometry optics and optical instruments]. In D. Irwanto, F. T. Akbar, & A. H. Aimon (Eds.), Prosiding Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains [Proceedings of the National Symposium on Science Innovation and Learning] (pp. 597-600). Institut Teknologi Bandung. https://bit.ly/46ELEKQ
Agustyaningrum, N., Abadi, A. M., & Mahmudi, A. (2018). An analysis of students’ errors in solving abstract algebra tasks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, Article 012118. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012118
Alacacı, C., Lewis, S., O’Brien, G. E., & Jiang, Z. (2011). Pre-service elementary teachers understanding of graphs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 7(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75171
Arnal-Palacián, M., & Claros-Mellado, J. (2022). Specialized content knowledge of pre-service teachers on the infinite limit of a sequence. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 14(1), 169-189.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction for research in education (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Asikhia, O. (2010). Students and teachers’ perception of the causes of poor academic performance in Ogun state secondary schools [Nigeria]: Implications for counselling for national development. European Journal for Social Sciences, 13, 229-242.
Aydin, S., Friedrichsen, P. M., Boz, Y., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2014). Examination of the topic-specific nature of pedagogical content knowledge in teaching electrochemical cells and nuclear reactions. Chemical Education Research, 15(4), 658-674. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00105b
Ayers, C. A. (2015). A qualitative study of the pedagogical content knowledge and personal orientations toward economics of award-winning secondary economics teachers. [Master’s dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.] https://libres.uncg.edu/ir/uncg/listing.aspx?id=18399
Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for Teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Bansilal, S., Brijlall, D., & Mkhwanazi, T. (2015). An exploration of the common content knowledge of high school mathematics teachers. Perspectives in Education, 32(1), 34-50. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC151360
Bolch, C. A., & Jacobbe, T. (2019). Investigating levels of graphic comprehension using the LOCUS assessments. Numeracy, 12(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.12.1.8
Boote, S. K., & Boote, D. N. (2017). Leaping from discrete to continuous independent variables: Sixth graders’ science line graph interpretations. The Elementary School Journal, 117(3), 455-484. https://doi.org/10.1086/690204
Briand-Newman, H., Wong, M., & Evans, D. (2012). Teacher subject matter knowledge of number sense. In J. Dindyal, L. P. Cheng & S. F. Ng (Eds.), Mathematics education: Expanding horizons. Proceeding of the 35th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 130-137). Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Burdina, M., & Sauerb, K. M. (2015). Teaching economic principles with analogies. Review of Economics Education, 20, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2015.10.001
Bursal, M., & Polat, F. (2020). Middle school students’ line graph skills and the affective states about common graph types used in science courses. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(4), 290-303. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.v8i4.1026
Bursal, M., & Yetiş, S. (2020). Middle school students’ graph skills and affective states about graphs. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(4), 692-704. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i4.1136
Çalik, M., Ayas, A., & Coll, R. K. (2009). Investigating the effectiveness of an analogy activity in improving students’ conceptual change for solution chemistry concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 651-676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-008-9136-9
Chen, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Sunbury, S. (2020). The impact of high school life science teachers’ subject matter knowledge and knowledge of student misconceptions on students’ learning. CBE- Life Science Education, 19(1), Article ar9. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-08-0164
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (2001). Models of data: A theory of how people evaluate data. Cognition and Instruction, 19(3), 323-393. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1903_3
Chinnappan, M., & White, B. (2015). Specialized content knowledge: evidence of pre-service teachers’ appraisal of student errors in proportional reasoning. In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.), Mathematics education in the margins. Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 157-164). Merga. https://bit.ly/3PDFzrw
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Department of Basic Education. (2021). National senior certificate diagnostic report, 2021. Part 1: Content subjects. https://wcedeportal.co.za/eresource/196376
Department of Basic Education. (2022). National senior certificate diagnostic report, 2022. Part 1: Content subjects. https://bit.ly/46fErBn
Diaz, V., Aravena, M., & Flores, G. (2020). Solving problem types contextualized to the quadratic function and error analysis: A case study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 16(11), Article em1896. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8547
Díaz-Levicoy, D., Batanero, C., Arteaga, P., & Gea, M. M. (2019). Chilean children’s reading levels of statistical graphs. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 689-700. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5786
Ding, M. (2016). Developing pre-service teachers’ specialized content knowledge: The case of associative property. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0041-4
Driana, E., & Ernawati, E. (2019). Teachers’ understanding and practices in assessing higher order thinking skills at primary schools. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education, 1(2), 110-118. https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v1i2.233
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Gan, Y., Scardamalia, M., Hong, H.-Y., & Zhang, J. (2010). Early development of graphical literacy through knowledge building. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 36(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.21432/T2C01S
Ghanaguru, S., Nair, P., & Yong, C. (2013). Teacher trainers’ beliefs in microteaching and lesson planning in a teacher training institution. The English Teacher, 42(2), 104-116. https://cutt.ly/qNJFNNz
Glazer, N. (2011). Challenges with interpretation the graph: A review of the literature. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 183-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.605307
González, M. T., Espinel, M. C., & Ainley, J. (2011). Teachers’ graphical competence. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics–Challenges for teaching and teacher education (pp. 187-198). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_20
Groth, R. (2017). Classroom data analysis with the five strands of mathematical proficiency. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 90(3), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2017.1301155
Gudyanga, E., & Madambi, T. (2014). Pedagogics of chemical bonding in chemistry; perspectives and potential for progress: The case of Zimbabwe secondary education. International Journal of Secondary Education, 2(1), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20140201.13
Güven, B., Öztürk, T., & Özmen, Z. M. (2015). Examination of middle school eighth-grade students’ experiences in the statistical process. Education and Science, 40(177), 343-363. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.3313
Hafiyusholeh, M., Budayasa, K., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). Statistical literacy: High school students in reading, interpreting and presenting data. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947, Article 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012036
Heng, C. K., & Karpudewan, M. (2017). Facilitating primary school students’ understanding of water cycle through guided inquiry-based learning. In M. Karpudewan, A. N. M. Zain, & A. I. Chandrasegaran (Eds.) Overcoming students’ misconceptions in science (pp. 29-49). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3437-4_3
Jonane, L. (2015). Analogies in science education. Pedagogika, 119(3), 116-125. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2015.027
Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., Gökkurt Özdemir, B., & Yasar, Z. (2018). Using digital stories to reduce misconceptions and mistakes about fractions: An action study. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 49(6), 867-898. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1418919
Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 586-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21378
Khoo, Y. Y., & Fitzgerald, R. (2017). Peer Learning with concept cartoons enhance critical thinking and performance in secondary school economics. Journal of Economics and Economic Education, 18(1), 1-13. https://bit.ly/3JmbBpi
Khoule, A., Bonsu, N. O., & El Houari, H. (2017). Impact of conceptual and procedural knowledge on students mathematics anxiety. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 4(1), 8-18. https://bit.ly/43ZmUwY
Loughran, J. (2019). Pedagogical reasoning: the foundation of the professional knowledge of teaching, teachers and teaching. Teachers and Teaching Theory and Practice, 25(5), 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1633294
Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (2nd ed.) Sense Publishers.
Makar, K., & Fielding-Wells, J. (2011). Teaching teachers to teach statistical investigations. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics–challenges for teaching and teacher education (pp. 347-358). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1131-0_33
Malyshkin, V. G. (2016). Market dynamics. On supply and demand concepts. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.04423
Mankiw, N. G. (2015). Macroeconomics (7th ed.). Worth Publishers.
Manzi, W. I., Mosia, M., Moreeng, B., & Masvosve, T. (2021). Grade 12 learners’ perceptions of opportunities to learn imperfect market structures: Frances Baard district. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(9), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.9.15
Mavhunga, M. E. (2012). Explicit inclusion of topic-specific knowledge for teaching and the development of PCK in pre-service science teachers. [Doctoral dissertation, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg]. https://bit.ly/46kHBny
Mukeredzi, T. G. (2017). Mentoring in a cohort model of practicum: mentors and pre-service teachers’ experiences in a rural South African school. SAGE Open 7(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017709863
Mukeredzi, T. G., Mthiyane, N., & Bertram, C. (2015). Becoming professionally qualified: the school-based mentoring experiences of part-time PGCE students. South African Journal of Education, 35(2), Article 1057. https://www.doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n2a1057
Musliha, S., Sudana, D., & Wirza, Y. (2021). The analysis of higher-order thinking skills (hots) in the test questions constructed by English teachers. In Fifth International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2021) (pp. 610-617). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211119.095
Ndlovu, Z., Amin, N., & Samuel, M. A. (2017). Examining pre-service teachers’ subject matter knowledge of school mathematics concepts. Journal of Education, 70, 46-72. Retrieved December 01, 2023, from http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2520-98682017000300003&lng=en&tlng=en.
Ng, S. F., & Chan, O. K. K. (2014). A preliminary study on the development of pedagogical content knowledge among economics and primary social studies student teachers in Singapore. HSSE Online 3(1) 25-36. https://bit.ly/46DQDLG
Nguyễn, T. M. T., & Nguyễn, T. T. L. (2017). Influence of explicit higher-order thinking skills instruction on students’ learning of linguistics. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.004
Ní Shúilleabháin, A. (2015). Developing mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through iterative cycles of lesson study. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME9, 4-8 February 2015) (pp. 2734-2740). Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Education and ERME.
Ogbonnaya, I. C. (2023). Analysis of Grade 10 opportunity-to-learn dynamics of market from two economics textbooks. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 12(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.15294/eeaj.v12i2.69848
Ojose, B. (2015). Students’ misconceptions in mathematics: analysis of remedies and what research says. Ohio Journal of School Mathematics, 72, 30-34. http://hdl.handle.net/1811/78927
Özel, Z., Yılmaz, A., Işıksal-Bostan, M., & Özkan, B. (2022). Investigation of the specialized content knowledge of the pre-service primary school teachers about multiplication. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 23(2), 115-143. https://doi.org/10.4256/ijmtl.v23i2.464
Ozmen, Z. M., Guven, B., & Kurak, Y. (2020). Determining the graphical literacy levels of the 8th-grade students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(86), 269-292. https://bit.ly/3TaSjsU
Patahuddin, S. M., & Lowrie, T. (2019). Examining teachers’ knowledge of line graph task: A case of travel task. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 781-800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9893-z
Rahman, N. A., Rosli, R., Rambely, A. S., Siregar, N. C., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2022). Secondary school teachers’ perceptions of STEM pedagogical content knowledge. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i1.pp119-134
Ramnarain, U., & Moosea, S. (2017). The use of simulations in correcting electricity misconceptions of grade 10 South African physical sciences learners. International. Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 25(5), 1-20. https://bit.ly/3Q6TY0E
Riga, F., Winterbottom, M., Harris, E., & Newby, L. (2017). Inquiry-based science education. In K. S. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science education (pp. 247-261). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_19
Roller, M. R., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2015). Applied qualitative research design: A total quality framework approach. Guilford Publications.
Rollnick, M., Davidowitz, B., & Potgieter, M. (2017). Is topic-specific PCK unique to teachers? In K. Hahl, K. Juuti, J. Lampiselkä, A. Uitto, & J. Lavonen (Eds.). Cognitive and affective aspects in science education research: Selected papers from the ESERA 2015 Conference (pp. 69-85). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58685-4_6
Rollnick, M., & Mavhunga, E. (2016). Can the principles of topic-specific PCK be applied across science topics? Teaching PCK in a pre-service programme. In N. Papadouris, A. Hadjigeorgiou & C. P. Constantinou (Eds), Insights from research in science teaching and learning: Book of selected papers from the ESERA 2013, Conference (pp. 59-72). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_5
Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12-21. https://bit.ly/3RodMNQ
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N., & Miller, J. L. (2013). The influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical science classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1020-1049. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213477680
Salazar Noguera, J. (2018). The role of classroom observation in pre-service English teachers’ understanding of the teaching profession. Porta Linguarum: Revista Internacional de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras, 30, 193-206. https://doi.org/10.30827/digibug.54068
Saleh, M., & Battisha, M. (2020). A proposed paradigm for the requirements for designing and using digital games-based learning by educable intellectual disabled children. Technium Social Science Journal, 2(1), 37-66. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v2i1.54
Sekwena, G. L. (2023). Active learning pedagogy for enriching economics students’ higher-order thinking skills. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(3), 241-255. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.3.15
Shongwe, B. (2022). A Causal-comparative study of South African pre-service primary mathematics teachers’ spatial visualization ability: Does common content knowledge matter? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(9), 2338-2363. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2020.1869333
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
Tajudin, N. M., & Kadir, N. Z. A. (2014). Technological pedagogical content knowledge and teaching practice of mathematics trainee teachers. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1605(1), 734-739. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4887681
Thorsen, K. E. (2016). Practice teachers’ role in teacher education-individual practices across educational curricula. Acta Didactica Norge, 10(2), 179-192. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.2417
Treagust, D., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. (2003). The role of sub-microscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353-1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306
Uyanik, S., Elbir, D., & Ozmen, Z. M. (2023). Determining the graphical literacy levels of the middle school mathematics teachers. Pedagogical Research, 8(2), Article em0158. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/13003
Van Steenbrugge, H., Lesage, E., Valcke, M., & Desoete, A. (2014). Pre-service elementary school teachers’ knowledge of fractions: A mirror of students’ knowledge? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 138-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.839003
Yong, C. L., & Kee, C. Z. (2017). Utilizing concept cartoons to diagnose and remediate. misconceptions related to photosynthesis among primary school students. In M. Karpudewan, M. D. Zain, & A. Chandrasegaran (Eds.), Overcoming students’ misconceptions in science: strategies and perspectives from Malaysia (pp. 9-27). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3437-4_2
Zembat, I., & Bayram, E. (2019, September 3-6). An articulation of specialized content knowledge of mathematics teachers in the context of measurement concepts. [Conference presentation]. European Educational Research Association. https://eprints.gla.ac.uk/216204/1/216204.pdf
Zhang, H. (2017). Accommodating different learning styles in the teaching of economics: With emphasis on Fleming and Mill’s sensory-based learning style typology. Applied Economics and Finance, 4(1), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.11114/aef.v4i1.1921
Zuidhof, P.-W. (2014). Thinking like an economist: the neoliberal politics of the economics textbook. Review of Social Economy, 72(2), 157-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2013.872952