The Code of Conduct for Research Integrity, Governance, and Ethics in Education in the USA, Europe, and Ukraine: Comparative Analysis
The purpose of the study is to identify how the coverage of topics of the Code of Conduct for Research in Education in Ukraine is consistent with the .
- Pub. date: October 15, 2022
- Pages: 2195-2207
- 333 Downloads
- 618 Views
- 3 Citations
The purpose of the study is to identify how the coverage of topics of the Code of Conduct for Research in Education in Ukraine is consistent with the ones from the United States of America (USA) and Europe. Furthermore, the study attempts to explore coherences in the documents so that these could be reviewed and addressed. The study used the methodology for mixed-methods systematic reviews to respond to the first research question and the survey research methodology to respond to the second one. It was identified that the research integrity and ethics terms were not sufficiently covered by the Codes of education and research organisations from Ukraine compared to the Codes from the USA and European Union (EU). It was found that there was a shift from emphasising the role of the researcher (contributor) in the Codes from the USA and EU to drawing the importance of regulatory and legal instruments for the maintenance of research integrity and ethics in Ukraine. The prescriptive wording in the Codes of professional organisations in the USA and EU was given much greater attention than in the Codes of educational and research institutions in Ukraine. The Codes of the educational and research institutions from Ukraine were considered to be tentatively consistent with the relevant ones from the database from the USA, and Europe.
Keywords: Comparative analysis, research ethics, research governance, research integrity.
References
All European Academies. (2017). The European code of conduct for research integrity (Revised ed.). ALLEA. http://bitly.ws/tzqi
Ana, J., Koehlmoos, T., Smith, R., & Yan, L. L. (2013). Research misconduct in low- and middle-income countries. PLOS Medicine, 10(3), Article e1001315. https://doi.org/gnq4xb
Ayodele, F. O., Yao, L., & Haron, H. (2017). Promoting ethics and integrity in management academic research: Retraction initiative. In S. Sorooshian, F. B. Mahmud, M. W. A. Khan, & T. Senthil Kumar (Eds.), Proceedings of the FGIC 1st Conference on Governance & Integrity “Innovation & Sustainability Through Governance” (pp. 442-459). University of Malaysia Pahang.
Cherkasy State Technological University. (2019). Kodeks akademichnoi dobrochesnosti Cherkaskoho Derzhavnoho Technologichnoho Universytetu [Code of academic integrity of Cherkasy State Technological University]. Cherkasy State Technological University. http://bitly.ws/qeIo
Chernihiv Polytechnic National University. (2020). Kodeks akademichnoi dobrochesnosti Natsionalnoho Universytetu “Chernihivska Polotechnika” [Code of academic integrity of “Chernihiv Polytechnic” National University]. Chernihiv Polytechnic National University. http://bitly.ws/qgrW
Dahlberg, L., & McCaig, C. (2010). Practical research and evaluation: A start-to-finish guide for practitioners. SAGE. https://doi.org/h9v8
Enago Academy. (2021). Research ethics and misconduct: What researchers need to know. Enago Academy. https://bit.ly/3COmpub
Engle, C. R. (2020). The ethics of authorship and preparation of research publications. World Aquaculture Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/jwas.12690
Federal register. (2021). Findings of research misconduct, 86(179), 52158–52160. National Library of Medicine. https://bit.ly/3e9QXwm
Glasow, P. A. (2005). Fundamentals of survey research methodology. MITRE. https://bit.ly/3La2pnO
Hesselmann, F., Graf, V., Schmidt, M., & Reinhart, M. (2017). The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles. Current Sociology Review, 65(6), 814–845. https://doi.org/cctb
Horbach, S. P. J. M., & Halffman, W. (2017). Promoting virtue or punishing fraud: Mapping contrasting discourses on ‘scientific integrity’. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(6), 1461–1485. https://doi.org/gcm3tg
Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics. (2019). Kodeks akademichnoi dobrochesnosti u Instytuti molekuliarnoi biolohii i henetyky Natsionalnoi Akademii Nauk Ukrainy [Code of academic integrity at the Institute of molecular biology and genetics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine]. Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics. http://bitly.ws/qe56
Izmail State University of Humanities. (2017). Kodeks akademichnoi dobrochesnosti Izmailskoho derzhavnoho humanitarnoho universytetu [Code of academic integrity of Izmail state university of humanities]. Izmail State University of Humanities. http://bitly.ws/qgr9
Jamovi. (2022). Jamovi. (Version 2.2.5) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
Komić, D., Marušić, S. L., & Marušić, A. (2015). Research integrity and research ethics in Professional Codes of Ethics: Survey of terminology used by Professional Organizations across research disciplines. PLOS ONE, 10(7), 1-13. https://doi.org/f7wpg3
KPMG Forensic. (2013). Integrity survey 2013. https://bit.ly/3L5tAQW
Mandal, M., Bagchi, D., & Basu, S. R. (2015). Scientific misconducts and authorship conflicts: Indian perspective. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 59(7), 400–405. https://doi.org/h9v9
Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. (2020). Do pytannia unyknennia problem i pomylok u praktykakh zabezpechennia akademichnoi dobrochesnosti [On the ways of avoiding problems and mistakes in the practice of ensuring academic integrity]. KSPU. http://bitly.ws/tzsz
Morawska, M., & Boughton, S. L. (2022). Types of research integrity issues encountered by a Specialist Research Integrity Group. In 9th International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication. JAMA Network. http://bitly.ws/tK5a
National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. (2019). Kodeks akademichnoi dobrochesnosti Natsionalnoho ahenstva iz zabezpechennia yakosti vyshchoi osvity [Code of academic integrity of the National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education]. National Agency for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. http://bitly.ws/qdXp
National University of Ostroh Academy. (2017). Kodeks akademichnoi dobrochesnosti Nаtsionalnoho universytetu Ostrozka Academiya [Code of academic integrity of the National university of Ostroh Academy]. National University of Ostroh Academy. https://bit.ly/3Rm9BPD
Novaes, M. R. C. G., Rodrigues, C. S., & Guilhem, D. B. (2018). Scientific integrity and copyright in codes of professional ethics. Revista Bioética, 26(3), 87-96. https://doi.org/h9v7
On Copyright and Related Rights, the Law of Ukraine 3792-XII (2022). https://bit.ly/3B0QTYF
On Higher Education, the Law of Ukraine 1556-VII (2022). https://bit.ly/3ec5qrx
Osho, A. (2017). Ethical issues in conducting research in the behavioral and social sciences. The International Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 5(12), 185-188.
Panigrahi, S., Mohd, R., Waris, M., & Kumar, S. (2017). Promoting research governance through integrity and ethical practices: A qualitative study. In S. Sorooshian, F. B. Mahmud, M. W. A. Khan, & T. Senthil Kumar (Eds.), Proceedings of the FGIC 1st Conference on Governance & Integrity “Innovation & Sustainability Through Governance” (pp. 460-469). University of Malaysia Pahang.
Pappas, S. (2021). Leading the charge to address research misconduct. American Psychological Association. http://bitly.ws/tzvz
Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University. (2021). Kodeks akademichnoi dobrochesnosti Umanskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universitetu imeni Pavla Tychyny [Code of academic integrity of Pavlo Tychyna Uman state pedagogical university]. Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University. http://bitly.ws/qeAU
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Sanjari, M., Bahramnezhad, F., Fomani, F. K., Shoghi, M., & Cheraghi, M. A. (2014). Ethical challenges of researchers in qualitative studies: The necessity to develop a specific guideline. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, 7(14), 1-6.
Sidlyarenko, A. (2018). Akademichna dobrochesnistʹ: Yak borotysya z plahiatom v Ukrayini [Academic integrity: How to deal with plagiarism in Ukraine]. Osvita.ua. https://bit.ly/3B0MpBd
Sorokina, N. G., Artyukhova, A. E., & Degtyareva, I. O. (Eds.). (2017). Akademichna dobrochesnistʹ: Problemy dotrymannya ta priorytety poshyrennya sered molodykh vchenykh: Monohrafiya [Academic integrity: Compliance issues and dissemination priorities among young scientists: Monograph]. Publishing House for Dnipropetrovsk Regional Institute of Public Administration of the National Academy of Public Administration under the President of Ukraine. https://bit.ly/3wHfEX6
State Emergency Service of Ukraine. (2020). Kodeks akademichnoi dobrochesnosti Instytutu derzhavnoho upravlinnia ta naukovykh doslidzhen z tsyvilnoho zahystu [Code of academic integrity of the Institute of Public Administration and Research in Civil Protection]. Institute of Public Administration and Research in Civil Protection. https://bit.ly/3d5JU7J
Stavale, R., Ferreira, G. I., Galvão, J. A. M., Zicker, F., Novaes, M. R. C. G., Oliveira, C. M., & Guilhem, D. (2019). Research misconduct in health and life sciences research: A systematic review of retracted literature from Brazilian institutions. PLOS ONE, 14(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/gghh5j
Stern, C., Lizarondo, L., Carrier, J., Godfrey, C., Rieger, K., Salmond, S., Apóstolo, J., Kirkpatrick, P., & Loveday, H. (2020). Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2108-2118. https://doi.org/ghf344
Sulima, Y., & Dienizhna, S. (2020). Academic integrity: Ethical and legal regulation in the university community. International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership, 2(10), 120-141. https://doi.org/h9wb
Taras Shevchenko National University. (2017). Etychnyi kodeks universytetskoi spilnoty [Code of ethics of the university community]. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. http://bitly.ws/qeBR
TRADOS GmbH. (2014). SDL Trados Studio 2014 (Version 7.0.615) [Computer Software]. https://www.trados.com/
United States Government Accountability Office. (2019). Scientific integrity policies: Additional actions could strengthen integrity of federal research. GAO Highlights. https://bit.ly/3RkEgNq
Wagle, K. (2020). Research ethics: Definition, principles, and advantages. Public Health Notes. http://bitly.ws/tzqf
Webtools. (2022). Text Analyzer [Web App]. Webtools Services. https://bit.ly/3Rj4eRe
Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. (2021). Kodeks akademichnoi dobrochesnosti natsionalnoho yurydychnoho universytetu imeni Yaroslava Mudroho [Code of academic integrity of Yaroslav Mudryi national law university]. Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. https://bit.ly/3xgX7S6
Zhytomyr Politechnic State University. (2020). Kodeks akademichnoi dobrochesnosti derzhavnoho universytetu “Zhytomyrska Polotechnika” [Code of academic integrity of Zhytomyr polytechnic state university]. Zhytomyr Politechnic State University. http://bitly.ws/qgss
Zwart, H., & ter Meulen, R. (2019). Addressing research integrity challenges: From penalising individual perpetrators to fostering research ecosystem quality care. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 15(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/ghv8ww