The Effect of Scientific Reading Based Project Model in Empowering Creative Thinking Skills of Preservice Teacher in Elementary School
Creative thinking skills are 21st century learning needs that can be applied through the Scientific Reading Based Project (SRBP) model. The purpose of.
- Pub. date: July 15, 2021
- Pages: 1329-1340
- 687 Downloads
- 1489 Views
- 5 Citations
Creative thinking skills are 21st century learning needs that can be applied through the Scientific Reading Based Project (SRBP) model. The purpose of this study is to empower creative thinking skills through SRBP models in science learning in elementary school teachers’ education students. This research is mixed research with qualitative and quantitative approaches. Qualitative research is used to explore students' creative thinking abilities. Quantitative research uses a quasi-experimental approach carried out for six months on the candidates of elementary school teachers’ education. Participants in this study were the candidate of elementary school teachers’ education of 75 people who took the Basic Concept of Science subject. Data collection in this study was through observation, documentation, pre-test, and post-test with essay questions to measure creative thinking skills. The final result of the project is the final product to measure creativity. The data analysis used was an ANOVA test to measure every aspect of creative thinking skill. Qualitative analysis was used to describe the learning process and the final project of creativity. The results showed that there was an increase in creative thinking skills from aspects of flexibility, elaboration, fluency and originality. The SRBP model has a positive effect on improving the ability to think creatively.
Keywords: Creative thinking, empowering, SRBP model.
References
Ahrari, S., Abu, B., Hassan, B., Wahiza, N., Wahat, A., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2016). Deepening critical thinking skills through civic engagement in Malaysian higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 21–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.009
Alghafri, A. S. R., & Ismail, H. N. B. (2014). The effects of integrating creative and critical thinking on schools students’ thinking. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 4(6), 518–525. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2014.v4.410
Almeida, L. S., Prieto, L. P., Ferrando, M., Oliveira, E., & Ferrándiz, C. (2008). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: The question of its construct validity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003
Aloqaili, A. S. (2012). The relationship between reading comprehension and critical thinking: A theoretical study. Journal of King Saud University - Languages and Translation, 24(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksult.2011.01.001
Amolochitis, E., Christou, I. T., Tan, Z.-H., & Prasad, R. (2013). A heuristic hierarchical scheme for academic search and retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 49(6), 1326–1343. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.002
An, D., Song, Y., & Carr, M. (2016). A comparison of two models of creativity: Divergent thinking and creative expert performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.040
Arpan, M., Sulistiyarini, D., & Santoso, D. (2016). Effect of motivation and creativity on students’ psychomotor ability. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 71–75. http://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v1i2.42
Benavides, F., Dumont, H., & Istance, D. (2008). The search for innovative learning environments. Innovating to learn, learning to innovate (pp. 21-44). http://doi.org/10.1787/9789264047983-3-en
Chang, S. H., Wang, C. L., & Lee, J. C. (2016). Do award-winning experiences benefit students’ creative self-efficacy and creativity? The moderated mediation effects of perceived school support for creativity. Learning and Individual Differences, 5(10), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.09.011
Chang, Y. S., Chen, M. Y. C., Chuang, M. J., & Chou, C. H. (2019). Improving creative self-efficacy and performance through computer-aided design application. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.007
Cho, J. Y. (2017). An investigation of design studio performance in relation to creativity, spatial ability, and visual cognitive style. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.006
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research. Pearson.
Creswell, J., & Clark, P. V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1011-1026. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196731
Glass, G. V. (1976) Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003
Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and authentic learning. Corwin Press.
Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164588
Hoorn, B., Der, V., & Whitty, S. J. (2017). Sciencedirect the praxis of “ alignment seeking ” in project work. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 978–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.04.011
Isabekov, A., & Sadyrova, G. (2018). Project-Based Learning to Develop Creative Abilities in Students. Technical and Vocational Education and Training, 28, 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73093-6_4
Johnson, C. (2010). Effective professional development and change in practise: Bariers science teachers encounter and implications for reform. School Science and Mathematics, 106(3), 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18172.x
Kai, S., Chu, W., Zhang, Y., Chen, K., Keung, C., Wing, C., & Lau, W. (2017). Internet and higher education the effectiveness of wikis for project-based learning in different disciplines in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.005
Kashani-Vahid, L., Afrooz, G., Shekoohi-yekta, M., Kharrazi, K., & Ghobari, B. (2017). Can a creative interpersonal problem solving program improve creative thinking in gifted elementary students? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 30(7), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.02.011
Kennedy, I. G., Latham, G., & Jacinto, H. (2016). Education skills for 21st century teachers. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22608-8
Kind, V. (2015). Preservice science teachers’ science teaching orientations and beliefs about science. Science Education, 100(1), 122–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21194
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009
Kostromina, S., & Gnedykh, D. (2016). Students’ Psychological Characteristics as Factor of Effective Acquisition of Visual Information in E-learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.016
Kwan, Y. W., & Wong, A. F. L. (2015). Effects of the constructivist learning environment on students’ critical thinking ability: Cognitive and motivational variables as mediators. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.006
Lemon, G. (2011). Diverse perspectives of creativity testing: controversial issues when used for inclusion into gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(5), 742-772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353211417221
Liu, W., Pan, Y., Luo, X., Wang, L., & Pang, W. (2017). Active procrastination and creative ideation: The mediating role of creative self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences, 1191, 227–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.07.033
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (2006). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge, 9, 95–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4
Merriam, S. B. A. (2002). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage
Moore, D. W., Bhadelia, R. A., Billings, R. L., Fulwiler, C., Heilman, K. M., Rood, K. M. J., & Gansler, D. A. (2009). Hemispheric connectivity and the visual–spatial divergent-thinking component of creativity. Brain and Cognition, 70(3), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.02.011
Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2&3), 107-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403
Murphy, C., Bianchi, L., Mccullagh, J., & Kerr, K. (2013). Scaling up higher order thinking skills and personal capabilities in primary science : Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.005
Nachiappan, S., Ahmad, D. A., Ganaprakasam, C., & Suffian, S. (2018). Application of higher order thinking skills (hots) in teaching and learning through communication component and spiritual, attitudes and values component in preschool. International Journal of Early Childhood Education and Care, 24(7), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol7.3.2018
National Research Council. (2010). Preparing teachers: Building evidence for sound policy. NCATE.
Parikh, C., Maddulety, K., & Meadows, C. J. (2020). Improving creative ability of base of pyramid ( BOP ) students in India. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100652
Pattanapichet, F., & Wichadee, S. (2015). Using space in social media to promote undergraduate students’ critical thinking skills. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.94170
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2007). Critical thinking competency standards. Faoundation for Critical Thinking.
Raamkumar, A. S., Foo, S., & Pang, N. (2017). Using author-specified keywords in building an initial reading list of research papers in scientific paper retrieval and recommender systems. Information Processing and Management, 53(3), 577–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2016.12.006
Mierdel, J., & Bogner, F. X. (2019). Is creativity, hands-on modeling and cognitive learning gender-dependent? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31(3), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.001
Royanto, L. R. (2012). The effect of an intervention program based on scaffolding to improve metacognitive strategies in reading: a study of year 3 elementary school students in Jakarta. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69(Iceepsy), 1601–1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.105
Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530–565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311423382
Schunk, D. H. (2009). Learning theories an education perspective (5th ed.). Pearson Education.
Slavin, R. E. (2012). Educational psychology theory and practice (10th ed.). Pearson Education.
Suryandari, K. C., Sajidan, Rahardjo, S. B., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2019). Buku panduan model scientific reading based project (SRBP). [Guidance book of scientific reading based project model (SRBP)]. UNS.
Syarifah, E. F., & Emiliasari, R. N. (2019). Project-based learning to develop students ability and creativity in writing narrative. Indonesian EFL Journal, 5(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v5i1.1627
Talat, A., & Chaudhry, H. F. (2014). The effect of PBL and 21st century skills on students. Creativity and Competitiveness in Private Schools, 2(Spring), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.35536/ljb.2014.v2.i2.a5
Torrance, E. P. (1990). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Scholastic Testing Services.
Ülger, K. (2016). The relationship between creative thinking and critical thinking skills of students, Journal of Education, 31(4), 695–710. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2016018493
Wang, X. (2016). The effect of language ability in creativity assessment [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Minnesota.