Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2014). Assessing associative distance among ideas elicited by tests of divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 26(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.901095

Addis, D. R., Pan, L., Musicaro, R., & Schacter, D. L. (2014). Divergent thinking and constructing episodic simulations. Memory, 24(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2014.985591

Adnan, A., Beaty, R., Silvia, P., Spreng, R. N., & Turner, G. R. (2019). Creative aging: Functional brain networks associated with divergent thinking in older and younger adults. Neurobiology of Aging, 75(1), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.11.004

Akcanca, N., & Ozsevgec, L. C. (2019). Effect of activities prepared by different teaching techniques on scientific creativity levels of prospective pre-school teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.1.71

Alfonso, V. B., & Romo, M. (2016). Creativity development trajectories in elementary education : Differences in divergent and evaluative skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19(3), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.11.003

Alrfooh, A. E. (2014). Prevailing patterns of thinking among students of Tafila Technical University, Jordan. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(9), 179–191.

Antink, A. M., & Lederman, N. G. (2015). Creative cognition in secondary science: An exploration of divergent thinking in science among adolescents. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1547–1563. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1043599

Ardiansyah, A. S., Junaedi, I., & Asikin, M. (2018). Student’s creative thinking skill and belief in mathematics in setting challenge based learning viewed by adversity quotient. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 7(143), 61–70.

Ayaz, M. F., & Sekerci, H. (2015). The effects of the constructivist learning approach on student’s academic achievement : A meta-analysis study. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 143–156.

Buchori, A., Setyosari, P., Dasna, I. W., Ulfa, S., Degeng, I. N. S., & Sa, C. (2017). Effectiveness of direct instruction learning strategy assisted by mobile augmented reality and achievement motivation on students cognitive learning results. Asian Social Science, 13(9), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n9p137

Chen, H., & Chen, Y. (2019). Influence of a creative problem-solving approach on college students’ creativity and its relation with team cohesion. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 64(3), 169–201. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201909

Chermahini, S. A., & Hommel, B. (2011). Creative mood swings: divergent and convergent thinking affect mood in opposite ways. Psychological Research, 76(5), 634–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0358-z.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.).  Routledge.

Darmawan, M., Budiyono, & Pratiwi, H. (2019). Mathematics learning achievement of vocational high school students’ viewed by adversity quotient. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1157(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042121

Davies, H. M. (2008). An overview of an investigation into the effects of using TASC strategies in the development of children’s thinking and problem-solving skills in. Gifted Education International, 24(2), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940802400323

Guignard, J., & Lubart, T. I. (2016). A comparative study of convergent and divergent thinking in intellectually gifted children. Gifted and Talented International, 22(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2007.11673481

Hidayat, W., Noto, M. S., & Sariningsih, R. (2019). The influence of adversity quotient on students’ mathematical understanding ability. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1157(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032077

Hidayat, W., Wahyudin., & Prabawanto, S. (2018). The mathematical argumentation ability and adversity quotient (AQ) of pre-service mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5385.239-248.

Ichsan, I. Z, Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Arif, W. P., & Prayitno, T. A. (2019). HOTS-AEP: Higher order thinking skills from elementary to master students in environmental learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 935-942. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935.

Kanchanachaya, N., & Shinasharkey, T. (2015). A study on interactions between anonymous and non-anonymous pre-service teachers in blended learning using creative problem solving technique to enhance pre-service teachers’ ability in professional practices. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2401–2406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.908

Kim, K., & Choi, S. B. (2017). Influences of creative personality and working environment on the research productivity of business school faculty. Creativity Research Journal, 29(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1239900.

Kusuma, D., Kartono, & Zaenuri. (2019). Creative thinking ability based on students’ metacognition in creative problem solving learning model with recitation and self-assessment in ethnomatematics. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(1), 25–34.

Lakey, J., & Einstein, A. (2009). Purposeful, creative problem solving. Gifted Education International, 25(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/026142940902500109.

Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., & Bahri, A. (2016). Improving students’ critical thinking skills through Remap NHT in biology classroom. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 1–19.

Minister of Education and Culture Regulation. (2016). Minister of education and culture regulation number 20 year 2016 concerning competency standards for primary and secondary education graduates. Jakarta, Indonesia: Indonesian Government Publishing Service.

Minister of Education and Culture Regulation. (2016). Minister of education and culture regulation number 21 year 2016 concerning basic and secondary education content standards. Jakarta, Indonesia: Indonesian Government Publishing Service.

Mutaqy, R. M., Nasution., & Purnomo, N. H (2019). Effects of TASC learning model (thinking actively in a social context) on ability problem-solving in natural resource management materials. The Indonesian Journal of Social Studies, 2(1), 11-20.

Nair, S. M., & Sanai, M. (2018). Effect of utilizing the STAD method (cooperative learning approach) in enhancing student’s descriptive writing skills. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(4), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2018.64.239.252

Nazzal, L. J. (2015). Engineering creativity: differences in creative problem solving stages across domains (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut Graduate School, United States of America).  Uccon Library.

Puccio, G., Burnett, C., Acar, S., Yudes, J., Holinger, M., & Cabra, J. (2018). Creative problem solving in small groups: The effects of creativity training on idea generation, solution creativity, and leadership effectiveness. Journal of Creative Behavior, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.381

Sagala, R., Umam, R., Thahir, A., Saregar, A., & Wardani, I. (2019). The effectiveness of STEM-based on gender differences: The impact of physics concept understanding. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 753-761. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.753

Samson, P. L. (2015). Fostering student engagement: Creative problem-solving in small group facilitations. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, VIII(1), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.22329/celt.v8i0.4227

Santoso, T., & Yuanita, L. (2017). Implementation of creative problem solving model to improve the high school student’s metacognitive. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 812(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001

Sari, D. M., Ikhsan, M., & Abidin, Z. (2018). The development of learning instruments using the creative problem- solving learning model to improve students’ creative thinking skills in mathematics. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1088(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012018

Setiawan, E., Juliantine, T., & Komarudin, K. (2017). Development creativity students through problem based learning model in physical education in reviewed of adversity quotient. 2nd International Conference on Sports Science, Health and Physical Education, (pp. 611-613). Science and Technology Publication, Lda.

Sharma, N., & Dhingra, R. (2018). Assessment of opportunities available to school children for the development of divergent thinking ability. International Journal of Current Advanced Research, 7(9), 15301–15307. https://doi.org/10.24327/ijcar.2018

Siphai, S. (2015). Influences of moral, emotional and adversity quotient on good citizenship of rajabhat university’s students in the northeast of Thailand. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(17), 2413–2421. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2212

Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ creative thinking process stages : Implementation of realistic mathematics education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 09(007), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.007

Stolz, P. G. (2007). Adversity quotient. John Wiley & Sons.

Subali, B., & Mariyam, S. (2016). The divergent thinking of basic skills of sciences process skills of life aspects on natural sciences subject in Indonesian elementary school students. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(1), 23.

Suryadi, B., & Santoso, T. I. (2017). Self-efficacy, adversity quotient, and students’ achievement in mathematics. International Education Studies, 10(10), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n10p12

Svidzinskaya, G. B., Baskin, Y. G., & Mezentseva, M. E. (2019). Using the semantic differential method to assess the learning motivation and attitude of first-year student’s towards chemistry in University of Emercom of Russia. International Journal of Educational and Practice, 7(2): 88-100. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.72.88.100

Tican, C., & Deniz, S. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ opinions about the use of 21st century learner and 21st century teacher skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.181.

Wallace, B., Molyneux, C., & Farrell, C. (2012). TASC: Thinking actively in a social context. A universal process : A powerful tool to promote differentiated learning experiences. Gifted Education International, 28(1), 58–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429411427645

Wang, H. (2019). Fostering learner creativity in the English L2 classroom : Application of the creative problem-solving model. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.005.

Webb, M. E., Little, D. R., Cropper, S. J., & Roze, K. (2017). The contributions of convergent thinking, divergent thinking, and schizotypy to solving insight and non-insight problems. Thinking and Reasoning, 23(3), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1295105

Wronska, M. K., Bujacz, A., Goclowska, M. A., Rietzschel, E. F., & Nijstad, B. A. (2018). Person-task fit: emotional consequences of performing divergent versus convergent thinking tasks depend on need for cognitive closure. Personality and Individual Differences, 1(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.018.

Zabelina, D. L., & Ganis, G. (2018). Creativity and cognitive control: behavioral and ERP evidence that divergent thinking, but not real-life creative achievement, relates to better cognitive control. Neuropsychologia, 118(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.02.014

Zainudin, M., & Istiyono, E. (2019). Scientific approach to promote response fluency viewed from social intelligence: is it effective?. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 801-808. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.801