The Effectiveness of Teaching Derivatives in Vietnamese High Schools Using APOS Theory and ACE Learning Cycle
Nguyen Thi Nga
,
Tang Minh Dung
,
Le Thai Bao Thien Trung
,
Tien-Trung Nguyen
,
Duong Huu Tong
,
Tran Quoc Van
,
Bui Phuong Uyen
The actions, processes, objects, and schemas (APOS) theory is a constructivist learning theory created by Dubinsky based on Piaget's epistemology .
- Pub. date: January 15, 2023
- Pages: 507-523
- 319 Downloads
- 419 Views
- 2 Citations
The actions, processes, objects, and schemas (APOS) theory is a constructivist learning theory created by Dubinsky based on Piaget's epistemology and used to teach math worldwide. Especially the application of APOS theory to the curriculum of a mathematics class helps students better understand the concepts being taught, which in turn contributes to the formation and development of mathematical competencies. With the aid of the APOS theory and the activity, classroom discussion, and exercise (ACE) learning cycle, this study sought to ascertain the effect of teaching derivatives in Vietnamese high schools. In this quasi-experimental study at a high school in Vietnam, there were 78 grade 11 students (40 in the experimental and 38 in the control classes). As opposed to the control class, which received traditional instruction, the experimental class's students were taught using the ACE learning cycle based on the APOS theory. The data was collected based on the pre-test, the post-test results and a survey of students' opinions. Also, the data that was gathered, both qualitatively and quantitatively, was examined using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 26) predictive analytics software. The results showed that students in the experimental class who participated in learning activities based on the APOS theory improved their academic performance and attitudes. Additionally, it promoted the students' abilities to find solutions to problems about derivatives.
Keywords: Academic achievement, ACE learning cycle, APOS theory, derivative, mathematics education.
References
Aminah, M., Kusumah, Y. S., Suryadi, D., & Sumarmo, U. (2018). The effect of metacognitive teaching and mathematical prior knowledge on mathematical logical thinking ability and self-regulated learning. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1134a
Arnawa, I. M., Sumarno, U., Kartasasmita, B., & Baskoro, E.T. (2007). Applying the APOS theory to improve students ability to prove in Elementary abstract algebra. Journal of The Indonesian Mathematical Society, 13(1), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.22342/jims.13.1.80.133-148
Arnawa, I. M., Yanita, Yerizon, Ginting, B., & Nita, S. (2021). Does the use of APOS theory promote students' achievement in elementary linear algebra? International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 175-186. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14310a
Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktac, A., Roa, S., Trigueros, M., & Weller, K. (2014). APOS theory: A framework for research and curriculum development in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7966-6
Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1996). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 6, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1090/cbmath/006/01
Baye, M. G., Ayele, M. A., & Wondimuneh, T. E. (2021). Implementing GeoGebra integrated with multi-teaching approaches guided by the APOS theory to enhance students' conceptual understanding of limit in Ethiopian Universities. Heliyon, 7(5), Article e07012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07012
Berry, J., & Nyman, M. A. (2003). Promoting students' graphical understanding of the calculus. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 479-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.006
Borji, V., Alamolhodaei, H., & Radmehr, F. (2018). Application of the APOS-ACE theory to improve students' graphical understanding of derivative. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2947-2967. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91451
Borji, V., & Font, V. (2019). Exploring students' understanding of integration by parts: A combined use of APOS and OSA. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(7), Article em1721. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106166
Borji, V., Font, V., Alamolhodaei, H., & Sánchez, A. (2018). Application of the complementarities of two theories, APOS and OSA, for the analysis of the university students' understanding on the graph of the function and its derivative. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6), 2301-2315. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/89514
Bressoud, D. M., Mesa, V., & Rasmussen, C. (2015). Insights and recommendations from the MAA National Study of College Calculus. MAA Press. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.109.3.0178
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539
Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E. D., Nichols, D., Schwingendorf, K., Thomas, K., & Vidakovic, D. (1996). Understanding the limit concept: Beginning with a coordinated process schema. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15, 167-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0732-3123(96)90015-2
Dubinsky, E. (2002). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking. In D. Tall (Ed.), Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 95–126). Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47203-1_7
Dubinsky, E. (2014). Actions, processes, objects, schemas (APOS) in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education, (pp. 8–11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_3
Dubinsky, E., & McDonald, M. A. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning in undergraduate mathematics education research. In: D. Holton, M. Artigue, U. Kirchgräber, J. Hillel, M. Niss, & A. Schoenfeld (Eds.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 275-282). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47231-7_25
Dubinsky, E., Weller, K., McDonald, M. A., & Brown, A. (2005). Some historical issues and paradoxes regarding the concept of infinity: An APOS analysis: Part 1. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 335–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-2531-z
Feudel, F., & Biehler, R. (2020). Students' understanding of the derivative concept in the context of Mathematics for Economics. Journal for Didactics of Mathematics/Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 42, 273-305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-020-00174-z
Fuentealba, C., Badillo, E., Sánchez-Matamoros, G., & Cárcamo, A. (2018). The understanding of the derivative concept in higher education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2), Article em1662. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100640
Gravetter, F., & Forzano, L. (2018). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Cengage.
Hao, T. V., Tuan, V., Nam, D. N., Tien, L. V., & Yen, V. V. (2015). Algebra and calculus. Vietnam Education Publishing House. [In Vietnamses]
Hartati, S. J. (2014). Design of learning model of logic and algorithms based on APOS theory. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 3(2), 109-118. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v3i2.5743
Hashemi, N., Abu, M. S., Kashefi, H., & Mokhtar, M. (2015). Designing learning strategy to improve undergraduate students' problem solving in derivatives and integrals: A conceptual framework. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1318a
Herawaty, D., Widada, W., Handayani, S., Berindo, Febrianti, R., & Anggoro, A. F. D. (2020). Students' obstacles in understanding the properties of the closed sets in terms of the APOS theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470, Article 012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1470/1/012068
Istikomah, D. A., & Jana, P. (2019). Mathematical problem solving ability in APOS modified learning model (M-APOS). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1254, Article 012071. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012071
Kamid, Huda, N., Rohati, Sufri & Iriani, D. (2021). Development of mathematics teachings based on APOS theory: Construction of understanding the concept of student straight line equation. Ta'dib, 24(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v24i1.2346
Kleiner, I. (2001). History of the infinitely small and the infinitely large in calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48, 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016090528065
Lan, X., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Teaching derivative concept using 6 questions cognitive model. Journal of Didactic Mathematics, 1(3), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.34007/jdm.v1i3.371
Maharaj, A. (2010). An APOS Analysis of students' understanding of the concept of a limit of a function. Pythagoras, 71, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v0i71.6
Maharaj, A. (2013). An APOS analysis of natural science students' understanding of the derivatives. South African Journal of Education, 33(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v33n1a458
Marsitin, R., & Rahayu Sesanti, N. (2018). Limit learning with APOS theory and maple to develop mathematical communication and critical thinking. In Y. M. Cholily, A. In'am, R. D. Azmi, R. D. Susanti, & S. K. Ummah (Eds.), Proceedings of the University of Muhammadiyah Malang's 1st International Conference of Mathematics Education (Vol. 160, pp. 54-59). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/incomed-17.2018.12
Moll, V. F., Trigueros, M., Badillo, E., & Rubio, N. (2015). Mathematical objects through the lens of two different theoretical perspectives: APOS and OSA. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 91, 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9639-6
Nguyen, T.-T., Trinh, T. P. T., Ngo, V. T. H., Hoang, N. A., Tran, T., Pham, H. H., & Bui, V. N. (2020). Realistic Mathematics Education in Vietnam: Recent policies and practices. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 57-71. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.81.57.71
Nguyen, T.-T., Trinh, T. P. T., & Tran, T. (2019). Realistic mathematics education (RME) and didactical situations in mathematics (DSM) in the context of education reform in Vietnam. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1340, Article 012032. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012032
Nufus, H., Yerizon, & Armiati. (2018). Validation of instructional learning based on M-APOS approach to improve students' reasoning. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 285, 200-201. https://doi.org/10.2991/icm2e-18.2018.46
Nurwahyu, B., Tinungki, G. M., & Mustangin. (2020). Students' concept image and its impact on reasoning towards the concept of the derivative. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1723-1734. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.4.1723
Orhun, N. (2012). Graphical understanding in mathematics education: Derivative functions and students' difficulties. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 679-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.551
Park, J. (2015). Is the derivative a function? If so, how do we teach it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9601-7
Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge (P. Walsh, Trans). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1967)
Piaget, J. (2006). The child's conception of number (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315006222
Rachmawati, D. A. (2020). Impulsive and reflective students' understanding to linear equations system: An analysis through APOS theory. MATHEdunesa, 9(1), 128-135. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v9n1.p128-135
Rahayu, R., Kartono, K., Dwijanto, D., & Agoestanto, A. (2023). Problem-solving process of students with a reflective cognitive style based on the action-process-object-schema theory. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.41
Sahin, Z., Erbas, A. K., & Yenmez, A. A. (2015). Relational understanding of the derivative concept through mathematical modeling: A case study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1149a
Salado, H., & Trigueros, M. (2015). Teaching eigenvalues and eigenvectors using models and APOS theory. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 39, 100-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.06.005
Selden, A., Selden, J., Hauk, S., & Mason, A. (1999). Do calculus students eventually learn to solve non-routine problems? Tennessee Technical University Department of Mathematics.
Siswono, T. Y. E., Kohar, A. W., Kurniasari, I., & Astuti, Y. P. (2016). An investigation of secondary teachers' understanding and belief on mathematical problem solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 693, Article 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/693/1/012015
Siyepu, S. W. (2013). An exploration of students' errors in derivatives in a university of technology. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.05.001
Susandi, A. D., Sa'dijah, C., As’ari, A. R., & Susiswo. (2017). Error analysis on prospective teacher in solving the problem of critical thinking mathematics with APOS theory. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 218, 71-75. https://doi.org/10.2991/icomse-17.2018.13
Syamsuri, Purwanto, Subanji, & Irawati, S. (2017). Using APOS theory framework: Why did students unable to construct a formal proof? International Journal on Emerging Mathematics Education, 1(2), 135–146. http://doi.org/10.12928/ijeme.v1i2.5659
Tokgoz, E. (2015, June 14-17). Analysis of STEM majors' calculus knowledge by using APOS theory on a quotient function graphing problem [Paper presentation]. 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington, USA. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.23552
Trigueros, M., & Martinez-Planell, R. (2009). Geometrical representations in the learning of two-variable functions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73, 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9201-5
Umam, K., & Susandi, A. D. (2022). Critical thinking skills: Error identifications on students' with APOS theory. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 182-192. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21171
Winarti, Ambaryani, S. E., & Putranta, H. (2022). Improving learners' metacognitive skills with self-regulated learning based on problem-solving. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.1528a
Zengin, Y. (2018). Examination of the constructed dynamic bridge between the concepts of differential and derivative with the integration of GeoGebra and the ACODESA method. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99(3), 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9832-5