Anderson, T. (2021). The socialization of L2 doctoral students through written feedback. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 20(2), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1726758

Andrade, H., & Cizek, G. J. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of formative assessment. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203874851

Aslam, M. Z., Barzani, S. H., Aslam, T., & Rasool, U. (2021). Teachers and students’ perceptions towards online ESL classrooms during COVID-19: An empirical study in North Cyprus. Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(4), 1423-1431. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2021.18.4.22.1423

Assarroudi, A., Heshmati Nabavi, F., Armat, M. R., Ebadi, A., & Vaismoradi, M. (2018). Directed qualitative content analysis: The description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(1), 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987117741667

Azman, H., Nor, N. F. M., & Aghwela, H. O. M. (2014). Investigating supervisory feedback practices and their impact on international research student’s thesis development: A case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.028

Barzani, S. H., Aslam, M. Z., & Aslam, T. (2021). The role of technology in ELL classes in Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus. International Journal of Language Education, 5(2), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i2.14109

Benson, S., & DeKeyser, R. (2019). Effects of written corrective feedback and language aptitude on verb tense accuracy. Language Teaching Research, 23(6), 702-726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818770921

Bitchener, J., Basturkmen, H., & East, M. (2011). The focus of supervisor written feedback to thesis/dissertation students. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 79-97. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119201

Bridge, P., & Appleyard, R. (2005). System failure: A comparison of electronic and paper-based assignment submission, marking, and feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 669-671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00485.x     

Buckley, E., & Cowap, L. (2013). Transformation in assessment and feedback: An evaluation of the piloted use of Turnitin for electronic submission, marking and as a formative feedback tool from an educator’s perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 562-570. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12054

Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132

Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(3), 623-630. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x

Davies, J., & Graff, M. (2005). Performance in e‐learning: Online participation and student grades. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 657-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00542.x  

Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE open, 4(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Fan, L., Mahmood, M., & Uddin, M. A. (2019). Supportive Chinese supervisor, innovative international students: A social exchange theory perspective. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(1), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9572-3  

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2012). Making time for feedback. Educational Leadership, 70(1), 42-47. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1002439

Gould, J., & Day, P. (2013). Hearing you loud and clear: Student perspectives of audio feedback in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(5), 554-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.660131  

Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B. M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002

Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001   

Hast, M., & Healy, C. (2018). It’s like fifty-fifty: Using the student voice towards enhancing undergraduates’ engagement with online feedback provision. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 7(1), 139-151. https://doi.org/10.14434/jotlt.v7i1.23806

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F003465430298487   

Hawari, O. M. A., Al-Shboul, Y., & Huwari, I. F. (2022). Supervisors’ perspectives on graduate students’ problems in academic writing. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 545-556. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.545  

Holsti, O. R. (1968). Content analysis. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, vol 2  (pp. 596-692). Addison-Wesley.

Hounsell, D. (2021). Feedback in postgraduate online learning: Perspectives and practices. In Online Postgraduate Education in a Postdigital World (pp. 39-62). Springer, Cham.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77673-2_3  

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Inouye, K., & McAlpine, L. (2019). Developing academic identity: A review of the literature on doctoral writing and feedback. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.28945/4168  

Iqbal, Z., Aslam, M. Z., Aslam, T., Ashraf, R., Kashif, M., & Nasir, H. (2020). Persuasive power concerning COVID-19 employed by premier Imran Khan: A socio-political discourse analysis. Register Journal, 13(1), 208-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.208-230  

Kibiswa, N. K. (2019). Directed qualitative content analysis (DQlCA): A tool for conflict analysis. The Qualitative Report, 24(8), 2059-2079. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3778  

Kim, Y., Choi, B., Kang, S., Kim, B., & Yun, H. (2020). Comparing the effects of direct and indirect synchronous written corrective feedback: Learning outcomes and students’ perceptions. Foreign Language Annals, 53(1), 176-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12443  

Kyngäs, H. (2020). Qualitative research and content analysis. In The application of content analysis in nursing science research (pp. 3-11). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_1   

Langer, M., König, C. J., & Papathanasiou, M. (2019). Highly automated job interviews: Acceptance under the influence of stakes. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 27(3), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12246  

Lee, I. (2019). Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more. Language Teaching, 52(4), 524-536. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000247

Lee, I. (2020). Utility of focused/comprehensive written corrective feedback research for authentic L2 writing classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 100734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100734

Lee, I., Luo, N., & Mak, P. (2021). Teachers’ attempts at focused written corrective feedback in Situ. Journal of Second Language Writing, 100809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100809

Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in system. System, 84, 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006

Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: Students’ perceptions of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701292548  

Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2021). How research on ethics in doctoral supervision can inform doctoral education policy. The Future of Doctoral Research: Challenges and Opportunities, 295-306. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003015383-30  

Lundgren, L., Stofer, K. A., Dunckel, B. A., Krieger, J., Lange, M., & James, V. (2019). Panel-based exhibit using participatory design elements may motivate behavior change. Journal of Science Communication, 18(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18020203  

Lust, G., Collazo, N. A. J., Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2012). Content management systems: Enriched learning opportunities for all? Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 795-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.009  

Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating written corrective feedback: (Mis)alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004

Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2020). Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts. Assessing Writing, 45, 100469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100469

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative Content Analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research/ Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 1(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-1.2.1089  

Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg, (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research in mathematics education: Examples of methodology and methods (pp. 365-380). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_13

McCabe, J., Doerflinger, A., & Fox, R. (2011). Student and faculty perceptions of e-feedback. Teaching of Psychology, 38(3), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628311411794

Mensink, P. J., & King, K. (2020). Student access of online feedback is modified by the availability of assessment marks, gender and academic performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12752  

Mohamadi, Z. (2018). Comparative effect of online summative and formative assessment on EFL student writing ability. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.003

Mydin, F., & Surat, S. (2021). Research capability: Early-career academics’ perception of doctoral studies. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1893-1905. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.4.1893

Neupane Bastola, M. (2021). Formulation of feedback comments: Insights from supervisory feedback on master’s theses. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(5), 565-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1804985   

Parkes, M., & Fletcher, P. (2017). A longitudinal, quantitative study of student attitudes towards audio feedback for assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(7), 1046-1053. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1224810  

Pitt, E., & Norton, L. (2017). ‘Now that’s the feedback I want!’Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(4), 499-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500  

Poland, B. D. (1995). Transcription quality as an aspect of rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1(3), 290-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049500100302

Pyhältö, K., Toom, A., Stubb, J., & Lonka, K. (2012). Challenges of Becoming a Scholar: A Study of Doctoral Students’ Problems and Well-Being. International Scholarly Research Notices, 2012(Article ID 934941), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/934941  

Reynolds, B. L., & Kao, C. W. (2021). The effects of digital game-based instruction, teacher instruction, and direct focused written corrective feedback on the grammatical accuracy of English articles. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(4), 462-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1617747  

Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Steele, J., & Holbeck, R. (2018). Five elements that impact quality feedback in the online asynchronous classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 15(3), n3. https://doi.org/10.9743/jeo.2018.15.3.10

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences 15(3), 398-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048  

Vattøy, K. D., & Smith, K. (2019). Students’ perceptions of teachers’ feedback practice in teaching English as a foreign language. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.024  

Wildemuth, B. M. (Ed.). (2016). Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Abc-Clio.

Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Rowntree, J., & Parker, M. (2017). It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it: Barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2026-2041. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032  

Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2013). Adaptability to online learning: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. Community College Research Center, 54, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.7916/D82N59NB   

Yang, M., Mak, P., & Yuan, R. (2021). Feedback experience of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Voices from pre-service English language teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 611-620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820906281  

Zhang, L. J., & Cheng, X. (2021). Examining the effects of comprehensive written corrective feedback on L2 EAP students’ linguistic performance: A mixed-methods study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 54, 101043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101043  

Zhang, T. (2021). The effect of highly focused versus mid-focused written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge development. System, 99, 102493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102493  

Zhang, Y., Yu, S., & Yuan, K. (2020). Understanding master’s students’ peer feedback practices from the academic discourse community perspective: A rethinking of postgraduate pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(2), 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1543261   

Zhu, M., Liu, O. L., & Lee, H. S. (2020). The effect of automated feedback on revision behavior and learning gains in formative assessment of scientific argument writing. Computers & Education, 143, 103668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103668