Using Reciprocal Teaching for Improving Students’ Skills in Mathematical Word Problem Solving - A Project of Participatory Action Research
This study aims to present the potential of Participatory Action Research (PAR) to bring together the experiences of teachers and researchers with the.
- Pub. date: July 15, 2021
- Pages: 1371-1382
- 1550 Downloads
- 1724 Views
- 5 Citations
This study aims to present the potential of Participatory Action Research (PAR) to bring together the experiences of teachers and researchers with the intention of improving teaching practices and students’ learning outcomes. Participants in the study were 7 teachers, their 160 fifths grade students, and researchers (authors). Teachers and researchers participated as partners in all collaborative activities during the period of 12 weeks. All teachers assisted by the researcher (first author) who serves as a teacher at the same school, were involved in implementing the reciprocal teaching method (RTM) in math classes. They examined each step of the implementation of this method in order to investigate whether it has an impact on student achievement in solving mathematical word problems. Teachers observed the work of students in their classes, whereas in the joint meetings they discussed occasional ambiguities as well as issues that were most challenging for them and their students. The results showed that there was a significant improvement of the students’ results in the post-test of the mathematical word problems. The analysis of teachers' reflections highlights the benefits of collaboration within the PAR project, both for students and teachers. The study suggests that the PAR model can be used effectively within school settings as a research model, and as a pedagogical practice.
Keywords: Reciprocal teaching, mathematical word problems, participatory action research.
References
Boonen, A. J. H., de Koning, B. B., Jolles, J., & Van der Schoot, M. (2016). Word problem solving in contemporary math education: A plea for reading comprehension skillstraining. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(191), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00191
Boonen, A. J. H., Van der Schoot, M., Van Wesel, F., De Vries, M. H., & Jolles, J. (2013). What underlies successful word problem solving? A path analysis in sixth grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 271–279. https://doi/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.05.001
Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., & Rupley, W. H. (2012). Reading-enhanced word problem solving: A theoretical model. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(1), 91-114. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0068-3
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Routledge Falmer.
Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, D. W., & Nuerk, H. (2015). Word problems: a review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(358), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348
Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140
Fraenkel, J. R.,Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). Mc Graw Hill.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Hamlett, C. L., Finelli, R., & Courey, S. J. (2004). Enhancing mathematical problem solving among third-grade students with schema based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 635-647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.635
Glenberg, A., Willford, J., Gibson, B., Goldberg, A., & Zhu, X. (2012). Improving reading to improve math. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(4), 316-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.564245
Hartman, H. (1994). From Reciprocal Teaching to Reciprocal Education. Journal of Developmental Education, 18(1), 2-32.
Jitendra, A. K., Griffin, C. C., Deatline-Buchman, A., & Sczesniak, E. (2007). Mathematicalword problem-solving in third-grade classrooms. Journal of Educational Research, 100(5), 283-302. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.5.283-302
Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2007). Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203933671
Kurshumlia, R., & Vula, E. (2019). The impact of reading comprehension on mathematics word problem solving. In M. Carmo (Ed.), END, 2019 International Conference on Education and New Developments (pp. 331-335). Education and New Developments. https://doi.org/10.36315/2019v2end076
Leavy, P. (2017). Research design. Quantitative, qualitative, mixed Methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. The Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcsr.12276
Lenchuk, I. (2021). Reciprocal teaching as an instructional strategy for identifying reading literacy problems: A case study of an Omani EFL classroom. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 10 (1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.23.2021.101.1.10
Limond, L. (2012). A reading strategy approach to mathematical problem solving. Illinois Reading Council Journal, 40(2), 31-42.
McTaggart, R. (1997). Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. State University of New York Press.
Meyer, K. (2014). Making meaning in mathematics problem-solving using the reciprocal teaching approach. Literacy Learning: the Middle Years, 22(2), 7-14.
Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Republic of Kosovo. (2016). Curricular Framework of Pre-university Education of the Republic of Kosovo. https://masht.rks-gov.net/uploads/2017/03/korniza-kurrikulare-finale.pdf
Montague, M., Enders, C., & Dietz, S. (2011). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on math problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34(4), 262-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0731948711421762
Moreno, G. A., & Rutledge, D. (2019). How participatory action research as pedagogy helped transform the identities of students enrolled in a developmental mathematics classroom. Educational Action Research, 28(5), 775-790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2019.1682630
Nurhayanti, H., Riyadi, & Usodo, B. (2020). Analysis of mathematical problem-solving skills viewed from initial ability and gender differences in an elementary school. Elementary Education Online/ Ilkogretim, 19(3), 1127-1141. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.716848
Özsoy, G., & Kuruyer H. G., & Çakiroğlu, A. (2015). Evaluation of students’ mathematical problem solving skills in relation to their reading levels. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(1), 113-132.
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering- and comprehension- monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. The Reading Teacher, 39(8), 771-777.
Pape, S. J., & Smith, C. (2002). Self-Regulating Mathematics Skills. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_5
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications.
Pearce, D. L., Bruun, F., Skinner, K., & Lopez-Mohler, C. (2013). What teachers say about student difficulties solving mathematical word problems in grades 2-5. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(1), 3-19.
Pilten, G. (2016). The evaluation of effectiveness of reciprocal teaching strategies on comprehension of expository texts. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(10), 232-247. http://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i10.1791
Pongsakdi, N., Kajamies, A., Veermans, K., Lertola, K., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2020). What makes mathematical word problem solving challenging. Exploring the roles of word problem characteristics, text comprehension and arithmetic skills. ZDM, 52(1), 33- 44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01118-9
Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324-339). Sage Publications Inc.
Reilly, Y., Parsons, J., & Bortolot, E. (2009). Reciprocal teaching in mathematics. In D. Martin, T. Fizpatrick, R. Hunting, D. Itter, Ch. Lenard, T. Mills, & L. Milne, L. (Eds.) MAV,2009. Proceedings of the Mathematics of Prime Importance Conference, the 46th Conference of the Mathematical Association of Victoria (pp.182– 189). The Mathematical Association of Victoria.
Richter, J. (2016). Research design: Participatory action research (PAR). In J. Richter (Ed.), Human rights education through Ciné Débat.(pp. 107-115). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12723-7_6
Robutti, O., Cusi, A., Clark-Wilson, A., Jaworski, B., Chapman, O., Esteley, C., Goos, M., Isoda, M., & Joubert, M. (2016). ICME International survey on teachers working and learning through collaboration. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(5), 651-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0797-5
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 479-530. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064004479
Salihu, L., & Räsänen, P. (2018). Mathematics skills of kosovar primary school children: A special view on children with mathematical learning difficulties. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(4), 421-430. https://doi.org/10.26822/IEJEE.2018438132
Skovsmose, O., & Borba, M. (2004). Research methodology and critical mathematics education. In P. Valero & R. Zevenbergen (Eds.), Researching the socio-political dimensions of mathematics education (pp. 207-226). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7914-1_17
Tarchi, C., & Pinto, G. (2016). Reciprocal teaching: Analyzing interactive dynamics in the co-construction of a text’s meaning. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 518-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.992583
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2016). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (9th ed.). Pearson Education.
Van Garderen, D. (2004). Reciprocal teaching as a comprehension strategy for understanding mathematical word problems. Reading & Writing Quarterly (20), 225-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560490272702
Vula, E., Avdyli, R., Berisha, V., Saqipi, B., & Elezi, S. (2017). The impact of meta cognitive strategies and self-regulating processes of solving math word problems. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017131886
Wessman Huber, C. (2010). The impact of reciprocal teaching on mathematics word problem solving for grade 4 students. [Doctoral dissertation, Central Connecticut State University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses A&I database.
Woolfolk, A. (2011). Psikologji edukimi [Educational psychology]. Qendra për arsim demokratik.
Wright, P. (2021). Transforming mathematics classroom practice through participatory action research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(2), 155-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09452-1
Zhu, N. (2015). Cognitive strategy instruction for mathematical word problem-solving of students with mathematics disabilities in China. International Journal of Disability Development, and Education, 62(6), 608-627. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2015.1077935