logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Christiaan Huygensstraat 44, Zipcode:7533XB, Enschede, THE NETHERLANDS
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
Christiaan Huygensstraat 44, Zipcode:7533XB, Enschede, THE NETHERLANDS
Research Article

Virtual Mathematics Kits (VMK): The Value of Spatial Orientation on It

Lingga Nico Pradana , Cholis Sa’dijah , I Made Sulandra , Sudirman , Octarina Hidayatus Sholikhah

The purposes of the current study were to develop students' spatial orientation skills using Virtual Mathematics Kits (VMK) and to evaluate VMK as.

T

The purposes of the current study were to develop students' spatial orientation skills using Virtual Mathematics Kits (VMK) and to evaluate VMK as a form of digital media in terms of spatial orientation. This study involved 42 lower-class and 47 higher-class elementary school students as the intervention group and 36 lower-class and 41 higher-class students as the control group. The intervention group was administered spatial orientation activities for 10 weeks. These activities were performed using a VMK to facilitate solving spatial problems. In the end of activities, spatial orientation instruments administered to compare spatial orientation ability on each group. The findings of this study, spatial orientation activities using a VMK improved students' spatial orientation skills. More specific, VMK provides more significant effect on higher-class students. Finally, VMK allows students to explore many ideas and perspectives to solve various spatial problems. VMK can be used as a digital media that helps students to develop spatial reasoning.

Keywords: Spatial orientation, virtual mathematics kits, digital media, extracurricular activities.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
598
Download
1058
Citations
Crossref
0

Scopus
1

References

Akayuure, P., Asiedu-Addo, K. S., & Alebna, V. (2016). Investigating the effect of origami instruction on preservice teachers’ spatial ability and geometric knowledge for teaching. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 4(3), 198–209. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.78424

Alp, E., Ertepinar, H., Tekkaya, C., & Yilmaz, A. (2008). A survey on Turkish elementary school students’ environmental friendly behaviours and associated variables. Environmental Education Research, 14(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802051747

Basham, L. K., & Kotrlik, J. W. (2008). The effects of 3-dimensional CADD modeling on the development of the spatial ability of technology education students. Journal of Technology Education, 20(1), 32–47.

Bruce, C. D., Sinclair, N., Moss, J., Hawes, Z., & Caswell, B. (2015). Spatializing the curriculum. In B. Davis (Ed.), Spatial Reasoning in the Early Years (Issue February 2016). Routledge.

Charalambous, C. Y., Hill, H. C., & Ball, D. L. (2011). Prospective teachers’ learning to provide instructional explanations: How does it look and what might it take? Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(6), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-011-9182-z

Cheng, Y. L., & Mix, K. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.725186

Fischer, U., Moeller, K., & Bientzle, M. (2011). Sensori-motor spatial training of number magnitude representation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 177–183. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0031-3

Forgasz, H., & Markovits, Z. (2018). Elementary students’ views on the gendering of mathematics. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 867-876. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.4.867

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Genlott, A. A., & Gronlund, A. (2016). Closing the gaps - Improving literacy and mathematics by ict-enhanced collaboration. Computers and Education, 99, 68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.004

Gilligan, K. A., Flouri, E., & Farran, E. K. (2017). The contribution of spatial ability to mathematics achievement in middle childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.016

Greefrath, G., & Siller, H. (2018). Uses of Technology in Primary and Secondary Mathematics Education. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76575-4

Guven, B., & Kosa, T. (2008). The effect of dynamic geometry software on student mathematics teachers’ spatial visualization skills. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4), 100–107.

Haciomeroglu, E. S. (2016). Object-spatial visualization and verbal cognitive styles, and their relation to cognitive abilities and mathematical performance. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(3), 987–1003. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.3.0429

Hallowell, D. A., Okamoto, Y., Romo, L. F., & La Joy, J. R. (2015). First-graders’ spatial-mathematical reasoning about plane and solid shapes and their representations. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0664-9

Hawes, Z., Moss, J., Caswell, B., & Poliszczuk, D. (2015). Effects of mental rotation training on children’s spatial and mathematics performance: A randomized controlled study. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4(3), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tine.2015.05.001

Hirza, B., Kusumah, Y. S., Darhim, & Zulkardi. (2014). Improving intuition skills with realistic mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 5(1), 27–34.

Ic, U., & Tutak, T. (2017). Correlation between computer and mathematical literacy levels of 6th grade students. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.1.63

Kospentaris, G., Vosniadou, S., Kazi, S., & Thanou, E. (2016). Visual and analytic strategies in geometry. Frontline Learning Research, 4(1), 40–57.

Kovacevic, N. K. (2017). Spatial reasoning in mathematics. International Scientific Colloquim Mathematics and Children Founded by Margita Pavlekovic, 6, 1–21.

Levenson, E., Tsamir, P., & Tirosh, D. (2010). Mathematically based and practically based explanations in the elementary school: teachers’ preferences. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-010-9142-z

Liao, K. H. (2017). The abilities of understanding spatial relations, spatial orientation, and spatial visualization affect 3D product design performance: using carton box design as an example. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9330-3

Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130467

Lowrie, T. (2016). Spatial reasoning influences students ’ performance on mathematics tasks. In B. White, M. Chinnappan, & S. Trenholm (Eds.), Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 407–414). MERGA.

Lowrie, T., & Jorgensen, R. (2017). Equity and spatial reasoning: reducing the mathematical achievement gap in gender and social disadvantage. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0213-7

Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Ramful, A. (2017). Visuospatial training improves elementary students’ mathematics performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12142

Moss, J., Hawes, Z., Naqvi, S., & Caswell, B. (2015). Adapting japanese lesson study to enhance the teaching and learning of geometry and spatial reasoning in early years classrooms: a case study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0679-2

Mulligan, J., Woolcott, G., Mitchelmore, M., & Davis, B. (2017). Connecting mathematics learning through spatial reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0210-x

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2006). Learning to Think Spatially. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11019

Newcombe, N. S. (2013). Seeing relationships: Using spatial thinking to teach science, mathematics, and social studies. American Educator, 37(1), 26–32.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing.

Patkin, D., & Fadalon, L. (2013). Developing third grade boys’ and girls’ spatial ability by means of an extra-curricular teaching unit. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education. Series D. Research in Mathematical Education, 17(2), 99–118.

Peng, A., & Sollervall, H. (2014). Primary school students’ spatial orientation strategies in an outdoor learning activity supported by mobile technologies. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 2(4), 246–256.

Pittalis, M., & Christou, C. (2010). Types of reasoning in 3D geometry thinking and their relation with spatial ability. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9251-8

Pradana, L. N., & Sholikhah, O. H. (2019). Mathematical literacy training (MLT) through virtual based mathematics kits (VMK) for best mathematics performance. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012017

Pradana, L. N., Sholikhah, O. H., Maharani, S., & Kholid, M. N. (2020). Virtual mathematics kits ( VMK ): Connecting digital media to mathematical literacy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(3), 234–241.

Sagala, R., Umam, R., Thahir, A., Saregar, A., & Wardani, I. The effectiveness of STEM-based on gender differences: The Impact of physics concept understanding. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 753 - 761. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.3.753

Salmah, U., Putri, R. I. I., & Somakim. (2015). Ten-Structure as strategy of addition 1-20 by involving spatial structuring ability for first grade students. International Education Studies, 8(11), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n11p16

Scheltenaar, K. J., van der Poel, J. E. C., & Bekker, M. M. (2015). Design-based learning in classrooms using playful digital toolkits. In K. Chorianopoulos, M. Divitini, H. J. Baalsrud, L. Jaccheri, & R. Malaka. (Eds.), Entertainment Computing (pp. 126–139). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24589-8_10

Williams, C., Gero, J., Lee, Y., & Paretti, M. (2010). Exploring spatial reasoning ability and design cognition in undergraduate engineering students. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 6, 669–676. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2010-28925

Yuksel, N. S. (2017). Measuring Spatial Visualization: Test Development Study. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Visual-spatial ability in STEM education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44385-0

...