How Difficult are Simple Electrical Circuit Conceptions? New Findings
Research on conceptual understanding is one of the first steps in designing materials to improve learning. Literature reports that students have diffi.
- Pub. date: July 15, 2023
- Pages: 1269-1284
- 387 Downloads
- 917 Views
- 2 Citations
Research on conceptual understanding is one of the first steps in designing materials to improve learning. Literature reports that students have difficulties analyzing and describing phenomena in electric circuits. This report contributes to students' conceptual difficulties regarding simple electrical circuits by systematically analyzing an open conceptual test answered by 531 first-year engineering students. We found students' reasoning that has not yet been reported in the literature as misconceptions or difficulties. To deepen our understanding of students' difficulties, we chose five students by convenience to interview. We present evidence that there are two main contributions to the taxonomy in this study: the Series Circuit Misconception, which is when students convey that the current through bulbs is the same because they are in series, using that as a mnemonic ignoring any change in the circuit; and the Inverse Parallel Circuit Misconception, that is when students mention that the resistance of the circuit decreases when disconnecting bulbs in parallel, neither are reported in the literature. The results of this study have implications for physics education research in electric circuits and educational practice in the classroom.
educational innovation electric circuits higher education students conceptions students difficulties
Keywords: Educational innovation, electric circuits, higher education, students' conceptions, students' difficulties.
References
Aktan, D. C. (2013). Investigation of students’ intermediate conceptual understanding levels: The case of direct current electricity concepts. European Journal of Physics, 34(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/gctkzz
Baser, M. (2006). Effects of conceptual change and traditional confirmatory simulations on pre-service teachers’ understanding of direct current circuits. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 367–381. https://doi.org/ccf7kd
Bryan, J. A., & Stuessy, C. (2006). The ‘Brightness Rules’ alternative conception for light bulb circuits. Physics Education, 41(6), 522–531. https://doi.org/bbwtvr
Campos, E., Tecpan, S., & Zavala, G. (2021). Argumentación en la enseñanza de circuitos eléctricos aplicando aprendizaje activo [Argumentation in the teaching of electrical circuits by applying active learning]. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Fisica, 43, Article e20200463. https://doi.org/j3mh
Chambers, S. K., & Andre, T. (1997). Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/fh633z
Chang, W., & Shieh, R. S. (2018). A study of the conceptual comprehension of electric circuits that engineer freshmen display. European Journal of Physics, 39(4), Article 045705. https://doi.org/j3mj
Cohen, R., Eylon, B., & Ganiel, U. (1983). Potential difference and current in simple electric circuits: A study of students’ concepts. American Journal of Physics, 51(5), 407–412. https://doi.org/dzs9b2
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of discipline-based education research in physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), Article 020119. https://doi.org/gctkp8
Dupin, J. -J., & Johsua, S. (1987). Conceptions of French pupils concerning electric circuits: Structure and evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(9), 791–806. https://doi.org/bjpvng
Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/fsrwfj
Engelhardt, P. V., Corpuz, E. G., Ozimek, D. J., & Rebello, N. S. (2004). The Teaching Experiment—What it is and what it isn’t. In J. Marx, S. Franklin, & K. Cummings (Eds.), AIP Conference Proceedings, 720: 2003 Physics Education Conference (pp. 157–160). American Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/brqzs3
Eshetu, F., & Alemu, M. (2018). Students conception of voltage and resistance concepts after conventional instruction. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 3021–3033. https://doi.org/j3mm
Frache, G., Vavasis, G. G., Mkrttchian, G., Stavropoulos, K., Kapotis, E. C., Nistazakis, H. E., & Tombras, G. S. (2019). Research and categorization of conceptual difficulties in electricity’s concepts and basic laws. In A. K. Ashmawy, & S. Schreiter (Eds.), Proceedings of Tenth IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference: EDUCON 2019 (pp. 999–1006). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). https://doi.org/j3mn
Fredette, N., & Lochhead, J. (1980). Student conceptions of simple circuits. The Physics Teacher, 18(3), 194–198. https://doi.org/bm2pzj
Fredette, N. H., & Clement, J. J. (1981). Student misconceptions of an electric circuit: What do they mean? Journal of College Science Teaching, 10(5), 280–285.
Gray, K. E., Hrepic, Z., Itza‐Ortiz, S. F., Allbaugh, A. R., Engelhardt, P. V., Rebello, N. S., & Zollman, D. A. (2004). Implications of a framework for student reasoning in an interview. In J. Marx, S. Franklin, & K. Cummings (Eds.), AIP Conference Proceedings, 720: 2003 Physics Education Conference (pp. 125–128). American Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/fv82fv
Heller, P. M., & Finley, F. N. (1992). Variable uses of alternative conceptions: A case study in current electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(3), 259–275. https://doi.org/cqz3qt
Hernandez, E., Campos, E., Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2022). Phenomenographic analysis of students’ conceptual understanding of electric and magnetic interactions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2), Article 020101. https://doi.org/j3mp
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141–158. https://doi.org/b6xr2c
Jiang, T., Wang, S., Wang, J., & Ma, Y. (2018). Effect of different instructional methods on students’ conceptual change regarding electrical resistance as viewed from a synthesized theoretical framework. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2771–2786. https://doi.org/j3mq
John, I., & Allie, S. (2019). DC circuits: III. The complex terrain of sense-making. European Journal of Physics, 40(5), Article 055704. https://doi.org/j3mr
Kalaya, T., Nopparatjamjomras, S., Chitaree, R., & Nopparatjamjomras, T. R. (2019). Worksheet analysis for revealing students’ understanding of simple DC circuits. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1380, Article 012164. https://doi.org/j3ms
Keller, C. J., Finkelstein, N. D., Perkins, K. K., & Pollock, S. J. (2006). Assessing the effectiveness of a computer simulation in conjunction with tutorials in introductory physics in undergraduate physics recitations. In P. Heron, L. McCullough, & J. Marx (Eds.), AIP Conference Proceedings, 818: 2005 Physics Education Conference (pp. 109–112). American Institute of Physics. https://doi.org/bbwkdb
Khwanda, M. N., & Kriek, J. (2020). An evaluation of student’s understanding of DC circuit concepts through students’ written explanations. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1512, Article 012020. https://doi.org/j3mt
Kokkonen, T., & Mäntylä, T. (2018). Changes in university students’ explanation models of DC circuits. Research in Science Education, 48, 753–775. https://doi.org/gdz2kd
Kortemeyer, G., Anderson, D., Desrochers, A. M., Hackbardt, A., Hoekstra, K., Holt, A., Iftekhar, A., Kabaker, T., Keller, N., Korzecke, Z., Gogonis, A., Manson, Q., McNeill, G., Mookerjee, D., Nguyen, S., Person, B., Stafford, M., Takamoribraganca, L., Yu, Z., … & Ratan, R. (2019). Using a computer game to teach circuit concepts. European Journal of Physics, 40(5), Article 055703. https://doi.org/j3mv
Leniz, A., Zuza, K., & Guisasola, J. (2017). Students’ reasoning when tackling electric field and potential in explanation of DC resistive circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), Article 010128. https://doi.org/j3mw
Leniz, A., Zuza, K., Sarriugarte, P., & Guisasola, J. (2020). University students’ explanations for electric current in transitory situations. European Journal of Physics, 41(1), Article 015702. https://doi.org/j3mx
Li, J., & Singh, C. (2016). Students’ common difficulties and approaches while solving conceptual problems with non-identical light bulbs in series and parallel. European Journal of Physics, 37(6), Article 065708. https://doi.org/grvxkz
Lin, J. -W. (2017). A comparison of experienced and preservice elementary school teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge about electric circuits. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 835–856. https://doi.org/j3mz
Manunure, K., Delserieys, A., & Castéra, J. (2020). The effects of combining simulations and laboratory experiments on Zimbabwean students’ conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Research in Science & Technological Education, 38(3), 289–307. https://doi.org/j3m2
Mbonyiryivuze, A., Yadav, L. L., & Amadalo, M. M. (2022). Physics students’ conceptual understanding of electricity and magnetism in nine years basic education in Rwanda. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/j3m3
McColgan, M. W., Finn, R. A., Broder, D. L., & Hassel, G. E. (2017). Assessing students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), Article 020121. https://doi.org/gdzz3p
McDermott, L. C., & Shaffer, P. S. (1992). Research as a guide for curriculum development: An example from introductory electricity. Part I: Investigation of student understanding. American Journal of Physics, 60(11), 994–1003. https://doi.org/cwvwph
McDermott, L. C., & Shaffer, P. S. (2002). Tutorials in introductory physics (1st ed.). Prentice Hall.
Moodley, K., & Gaigher, E. (2019). Teaching electric circuits: Teachers’ perceptions and learners’ misconceptions. Research in Science Education, 49, 73–89. https://doi.org/gmxc72
Ortega-Alvarez, J. D., Sanchez, W., & Magana, A. J. (2018). Exploring undergraduate students’ computational modeling abilities and conceptual understanding of electric circuits. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/gd3hp7
Peşman, H., & Eryılmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208-222. https://doi.org/dznct3
Pollock, S. J. (2009). Longitudinal study of student conceptual understanding in electricity and magnetism. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 5(2), Article 020110. https://doi.org/fggncf
Quezada-Espinoza, M., del Campo, V., & Zavala, G. (2015). Technology and research-based strategies: Learning and alternative conceptions. In A. Churukian, D. L. Jones, & L. Ding (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2015 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 271–274). American Association of Physics Teachers. https://doi.org/j3m4
Quezada-Espinoza, M., Dominguez, A., & Zavala, G. (2016). Using RealTime Physics with different instructional technologies in a circuits lab. In D. L. Jones, L. Ding, & A. Traxler (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 256–259). American Association of Physics Teachers. https://doi.org/j3m5
Quezada-Espinoza, M., & Zavala, G. (2014). El uso de calculadoras con sensores en el aprendizaje de circuitos eléctricos [The use of calculators with sensors in learning electrical circuits]. Latin American Journal of Physics Education, 8(4), Article 4507. https://bit.ly/3Jyu9Ce
Quezada-Espinoza, M., & Zavala, G. (2017). Research-based strategies in an electric circuits lab. In M. Ramírez-Montoya (Ed.), Handbook of research on driving STEM learning with educational technologies (pp. 365–393). IGI Global. https://doi.org/j3m6
Sencar, S., & Eryılmaz, A. (2004). Factors mediating the effect of gender on ninth-grade Turkish students’ misconceptions concerning electric circuits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(6), 603–616. https://doi.org/dfbxdf
Shipstone, D. (1988). Pupils’ understanding of simple electrical circuits. Some implications for instruction. Physics Education, 23(2), 92–96. https://doi.org/bv84p7
Shipstone, D. M., von Rhöneck, C., Jung, W., Kärrqvist, C., Dupin, J. -J., Johsua, S., & Licht, P. (1988). A study of students’ understanding of electricity in five European countries. International Journal of Science Education, 10(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/frk5cj
Smith, D. P., & van Kampen, P. (2011). Teaching electric circuits with multiple batteries: A qualitative approach. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 7(2), Article 020115. https://doi.org/d2jx4v
Sokoloff, D. R. (1996). Teaching electric circuit concepts using microcomputer-based current/voltage probes. In R.F. Tinker (Ed.), Microcomputer–based labs: Educational research and standards (pp. 129–146). Springer. https://doi.org/dw3s5k
Sokoloff, D. R., Laws, P. W., & Thornton, R. K. (2007). Realtime physics: Active learning labs transforming the introductory laboratory. European Journal of Physics, 28(3), S83–S94. https://doi.org/df8qvk
Stetzer, M. R., van Kampen, P., Shaffer, P. S., & McDermott, L. C. (2013). New insights into student understanding of complete circuits and the conservation of current. American Journal of Physics, 81(2), 134-143. https://doi.org/f4njz6
Taşlıdere, E. (2013). Effect of conceptual change oriented instruction on students’ conceptual understanding and decreasing their misconceptions in DC electric circuits. Creative Education, 4(4), 273-282. https://doi.org/gq2jvs
Trowbridge, D. E., & McDermott, L. C. (1980). Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension. American Journal of Physics, 48(12), 1020–1028. https://doi.org/c6rvqj
Villarino, G. N. B. (2018). Students’ alternative conceptions and patterns of understanding concerning electric circuits. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 26(4), 49–70. http://bit.ly/3lmSG5v
White, J. -S. S., Van Dusen, B., & Roualdes, E. A. (2016). The impacts of learning assistants on student learning of physics. In D. L. Jones, L. Ding, & A. Traxler (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings (pp. 384–387). American Association of Physics Teachers. https://doi.org/j3m7
Wong, D., Lee, P., & Foong, S. K. (2017). Which bulb is brighter? It depends on connection! Strategies for illuminating electrical concepts using light bulbs. Physics Education, 52(6), Article 065008. https://doi.org/j3m8
Zavala, G., & Martinez-Torteya, C. E. (2019, June 16–19). Students’ abilities to solve RC circuits with research-based educational strategies [Paper presentation]. 2019 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, United States. https://doi.org/j3m9
Zavala, G., & Martinez-Torteya, C. E. (2020, June 22-26). Students’ abilities to solve RC circuits with cognitive scaffolding activities [Paper presentation]. 2020 American Society for Engineering Education Virtual Annual Conference, Virtual Online. https://doi.org/j3nb