Influencing Variables and Implications in the Teacher-Student Relationships
Yung-Hsiang Hu
,
Randolf L. Asistido
,
Mary Jonie O. Villanueva
The purpose of the study was to examine correlations between perceived teacher innovation (PTI) and self-regulated learning (SRL), where learning moti.
- Pub. date: July 15, 2021
- Pages: 1317-1327
- 389 Downloads
- 1000 Views
- 0 Citations
The purpose of the study was to examine correlations between perceived teacher innovation (PTI) and self-regulated learning (SRL), where learning motivation, self-efficacy, and learning transfer help illustrate the interplay between and among influencing variables in the teacher-student relationship. This study gathered 213 valid questionnaires out of 355 participants in the Design Thinking for Data Scientists, which is one of the courses taught from a university in Taiwan. This study has analyzed the possible linkage in the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) through the path coefficient. The ensuing data analysis study has shown that learning motivation, self-efficacy, and learning transfer not only served as the mediator effects in the PTI and SRL but also played small moderating effects. It appears that when learning motivation, self-efficacy, and learning transfer decrease, the interplay between PTI and SRL becomes stronger. It is necessary to increase the level of intrinsic motivation by the perception of greater innovation in teaching materials. By so doing, students would be more receptive and affective of course contents in the classroom and regulate themselves to achieve educational goals. The implications of teachers' perceptions of pedagogical innovation for learning motivation and learning experience are likewise discussed.
learning motivation learning transfer perceived teacher innovation self efficacy self regulated learning
Keywords: Learning motivation, learning transfer, perceived teacher innovation, self-efficacy, self-regulated learning.
References
Babin, B., & Zikmund, W. (2016). Essentials of marketing research (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Bagozzi, R. P. (1980). Casual models in marketing. Wiley.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structure equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16(1), 74-94. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Capon, N., & Kuhn, D. (2004). What’s so good about problem-based learning? Cognition and Instruction, 22(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690Xci2201_3
Chin, W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Clark, C. M., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In M. C. Whittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255-296). Macmillan.
Colliver, J. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory. academic medicine, 75(3), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200003000-00017
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin.
Cooney, T. J. (1994). Research and teacher education: In search of common ground. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25(6), 608-636. https://doi.org/10.2307/749575
Credé, M., & Kuncel, N. R. (2008). Study habits, skills, and attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(6), 425-453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x
Elliot, A. (1997). Integrating the ‘classic’ and ‘contemporary’ approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation, In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.) Advances in motivation and achievement (vol.10., pp. 143-179). JAI Press.
Ersanlı, C. Y. (2015). The relationship between students’ academic self-efficacy and language learning motivation: A study of 8th graders. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 472-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.534
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal Mark Researcher, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Gaskill, P. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2002). Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning: The dynamic duo in school performance. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement (pp. 185-208). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012064455-1/50012-9
Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-Efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. The Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 183-211. https://doi.org/10.2307/258770
Godinez, E., & Leslie, B. B. (2015). Army civilian leadership development: Self-efficacy, choice, and learning transfer. Adult Learning, 26(3), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159515583259
Hair, J. F., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications Incorporated.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C., & Mena, J. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
Harackiewicz, J., Barron, K. E., Carter, S., Lehto, A., & Elliot, A. (1997). Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1284-1295. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1284
Harris, S., Lowery-Moore, H., & Farrow, V. (2008). Extending transfer of learning theory to transformative learning theory: A model for promoting teacher leadership. Theory into Practice, 47(4), 318-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802329318
Hung, W. (2013). Problem-based learning: A learning environment for enhancing learning transfer. New directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2013(137), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.20042
James, M. A. (2012). An investigation of motivation to transfer second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 96(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01281.x
Johnson, D. (2017). The Role of Teachers in Motivating Students to Learn. BU Journal of Graduate Studies in Education, 9(1), 46-49. https://www.brandonu.ca/master-education/files/2019/09/BU-Journal-of-Graduate-Studies-in-Education-2017-vol-9-issue-1.pdf
Jufrida, J., Kurniawan, W., Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., & Maya, W. A. (2019). Students' attitude and motivation in mathematical physics. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 401-408. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.20253
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1967). Evaluation of training. In R. L. Craig & L. R. Bittel (Eds.), Training and Development Handbook (pp. 87-112). McGraw Hill.
Kirkpatrick, J., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick four levels® evaluation certificate program. ATD Press.
Lee, J. C.-K., Zhang, Z., & Yin, H. (2010). Using multidimensional rasch analysis to validate the Chinese version of the motivated strategies for learning questionn- aire (MSLQ-CV). European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25(1), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-009-0009-6
Marini, A., & Genereux, R. (1995). The challenge of teaching for transfer. In A. McKeough, J. Lupart & A. Marini (Eds.), Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning (pp. 1-19). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mayer, R. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp.449-460). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916.024
McMahon, T. (2006). Teaching for more effective learning: Seven maxims for practice. Radiography, 12(1), 34-44. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2005.03.009
Molden, D. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2000). Meaning and motivation. In C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (pp.131-159). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012619070-0/50028-3
Moore, I. (2011). The national HE STEM programme curriculum innovation projects. A guide to practice: Evaluating your teaching innovation. University of Birmingham.
Muller, F. H., Palekcic, M., Beck, M., & Wanninger, S. (2006). Personality, motives and learning environments predictors of self-determined learning motivation. Review of Psychology, 13(2), 75-86. https://hrcak.srce.hr/17410
Nafukho, F. M., Alfred, M., Chakraborty, M., Johnson, M., & Cherrstrom, C. A. (2017). Predicting workplace transfer of learning: A study of adult learners enrolled in a continuing professional education training program. European Journal of Training & Development, 41(4), 327-353. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-2016-0079
Ngeow, K. Y. H. (1998). Motivation and transfer in language learning. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED427318
Norman, G., & Schmidt, H. (2000). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Theory, practice and paper darts. Medical Education, 34(9), 721-728. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00749.x
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Measuring innovation in education: A new perspective, educational research and innovation. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264215696-en
Peterson, P. L., Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., & Loef, M. (1989). Teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics. Cognition and Instruction, 6(1), 1-40. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0601_1
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames, & M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments (pp.117-160). JAI Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.451-502). Academic Press.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3
Raaijmakers, S. F., Baars, M., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2018). Training self‐assessment and task‐selection skills to foster self-regulated learning: Do trained skills transfer across domains? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(2), 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3392
Reason, R. D., Terenzini, P. T., & Domingo, R. J. (2006). First things first: Developing academic competence in the first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 47(2006), 149-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-8884-4
Roeser, R. W., & Peck, S. C. (2009). An education in awareness: Self, motivational and self-regulated learning in contemplative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832376
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Schuitema, J., Peetsma, T., & van der Veen, I. (2012). Self-regulated learning and students’ perceptions of innovative and traditional learning environments: A longitudinal study in secondary education. Educational Studies, 38(4), 397-413. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2011.643105
Shin, M. H. (2018). The effects of project-based learning on students' motivation and self-efficacy. English Teaching, 73(1), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.73.1.201803.95
Solberg, V. S., O’Brien, K., Villareal, P., Kennel, R., & Davis, B. (1993). Self-efficacy and Hispanic college student: Validation of the college self-efficacy instrument. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 15(1), 80-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863930151004
Sungur, S., & Tekkaya, C. (2010). Effects of problem-based learning and traditional instruction on self-regulated learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(5), 307. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.5.307-320
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48, 159-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
Tonhäuser, C., & Büker, L. (2016). Determinants of transfer of training: A comprehensive literature review. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 3(2), 127-165. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.3.2.4
Voskamp, A., Kuiper, E., & Volman, M. (2020). Teaching practices for self-directed and self-regulated learning: Case studies in Dutch innovative secondary schools. Educational Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1814699
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2012). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning (pp. 309-326). Routledge.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2