Smart Automated Language Teaching Through the Smart Sender Platform
Mariia Lychuk
,
Nataliya Bilous
,
Svitlana Isaienko
,
Lesya Gritsyak
,
Oleg Nozhovnik
The purpose of the research was to identify whether the English language e-classes that are automated and delivered through the Smart Sender platform .
- Pub. date: April 15, 2021
- Pages: 841-854
- 571 Downloads
- 1207 Views
- 7 Citations
The purpose of the research was to identify whether the English language e-classes that are automated and delivered through the Smart Sender platform influence the students’ attendance and procrastination rates, their motivation, time management skills, cognitive processing speed, and satisfaction. The study used qualitative and quantitative methods to monitor students’ attendance and procrastination rates, motivation and engagement, time management skills, thinking speed, and satisfaction. The questionnaire on learning motivation, engagement, and competence, the time management skills test, the mental speed test, and the course satisfaction questionnaire were used to collect data. The focus group discussion questionnaire was used to obtain verbal feedback for the participants. The Smart Sender platform proved effective as an instructional tool for teaching the English Language to students majoring in Philology, International Business, and Law. The automated delivery of the English language e-classes was effective in addressing the issues of dropouts and procrastination in distance learning through automation of the lesson delivery based on the ‘push’ factor. It increased students’ motivation, improves time management skills, and satisfaction. The quantitative findings showed that the students experienced a positive change in attendance, motivation and learning engagement, time management skills, and thinking speed due to the intervention. The students perceived the automated delivery-based approach to language teaching positively. They reported that the delivery approach content met the participants’ expectations and needs. Focus group discussion revealed that the intervention changed their learning behaviour and strategies which were considered the improvements of the quality learning outcomes.
higher education foreign language teaching smart technology automated delivery smart sender platform
Keywords: Higher education, foreign language teaching, smart technology, automated delivery, Smart Sender platform.
References
Altun, M. (2015). The integration of technology into foreign language teaching. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(1), 22-27.
Abu-Ayfah, Z. A. (2020). Telegram app in learning English: EFL students’ perceptions. English Language Teaching, 13(1), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n1p51
Ahlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., & Sellnow, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436052000318541
Armstrong-Mensah, E., Ramsey-White, K., Yankey, B., & Self-Brown, S. (2020). COVID-19 and Distance learning: Effects on Georgia State University School of Public Health students. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.576227
Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158433
Bobrytska, V. I., Reva, T. D., Protska, S. M., & Chkhalo, O. M. (2020). Effectiveness and stakeholders’ perceptions of the integration of automated e-learning courses into vocational education programmes in universities in Ukraine. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(5), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.5.3
Bonnaud, O. (2019). New vision in microelectronics education: Smart e-learning and know-how, A Complementary approach. In V. Uskov, R. Howlett, L. Jain & L. Vlacic (Eds.), Smart Education and e-Learning 2018, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 99. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92363-5_25
Budhrani, K., Ji, Y., & Lim, J. H. (2018). Unpacking conceptual elements of smart learning in the Korean scholarly discourse. Smart Learning Environments, 5(23), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-018-0069-7
Burke, L. (2020). Moving into the long term. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2020/10/27/long-term-online-learning-pandemic-may-impact-students-well
Cambridge ALTA. (2020). Research in computer systems and platforms, corpus linguistics, computational linguistics, speech processing, and machine learning. http://alta.cambridgeenglish.org/
Colace, F., Santo, M., Lombardi, M., Pascale, F., Pietrosanto, A., & Lemma, S. (2018). Chatbot for e-learning: A case of study. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, 7(5), 528-533. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijmerr.7.5.528-533
Ergin, H., & Morche, B. (2018). Internationalisation of HE through distance learning. University World News. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20180509084648106
Forteza, F. R., & Pastor, M. L. C. (2014). Virtual language learning environments: the standardization of evaluation. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education Social and Technological Sciences, 1(1), 135-152. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2014.2199
Gilbert, B. (2015). Online learning: revealing the benefits and challenges [Masters’ thesis, St. John Fisher College]. Fisher Digital Publications. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/48619313.pdf
Gregori, P., Martínez, V., & Moyano-Fernández, J. J. (2018). Basic actions to reduce dropout rates in distance learning. Evaluation and Program planning, 66, 48-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.10.004
Gordon, N. A. (2014). Flexible Pedagogies: Technology-enhanced learning. The Higher Education Academy. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2052.5760
Huang, R. H., Liu, D. J., Tlili, A., Yang, J. F., Wang, H. H., Berrada, K., Burgos, D., Chan, C., Chen, N.-S., Cui, W., Dahdahjani, S., Grosseck, G., Holotescu, C., Hu, X., Jemn, M., Khribi, K., Kinshuk, Liang, J., Lee, O., Looi, C.-K., Nascimbeni, F., Spector, J. M., & Zhao, J. (2020). Handbook on Facilitating Flexible Learning During Educational Disruption: The Chinese Experience in Maintaining Undisrupted Learning in COVID-19 Outbreak. Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University. http://iasle.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Handbook_Facilitating_Flexible_Learning.pdf
Jeno, L. M., Adachi, P. J. C., Grytnes, J.‐A., Vandvik, V., & Deci, E. L. (2019). The effects of m‐learning on motivation, achievement, and well‐being: A self‐determination theory approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 669-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12657
Jesus E., & Herrera, H. (2020). Emerging & mobile technologies in foreign language learning. Harvard University. https://scholar.harvard.edu/eherrera/blog/emerging-mobile-technologies-foreign-language-learning
Kacetl, J., & Klímová, B. (2019). Use of smartphone applications in English language learning—A Challenge for foreign language education. Education Sciences, 9(3), 179-188. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030179
Kasperiūnienė, J., & Daukilas, S. (2018). Smart educational technology in the learning process at a rural vocational training institution - A Case study. In A. Raupelienė (Ed.), Proceedings of International Scientific Conference “Rural Development 2017” (pp. 1-5). Aleksandras Stulginskis University. https://doi.org/10.15544/rd.2017.128
Kaur, D. (2018). How smart class technology is benefiting the education sector. Entrepreneur. https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/322587
Kim, M. (2014). Motivated strategies for learning questionnaire-adapted version (MSLQ) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t61505-000
Kohne, A., Ringleb, S., & Yücel, C. (2015). Bring your own device. Springer Vieweg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03717-8
Kotsiantis, S. B., Pierrakeas, C. J., & Pintelas, P. E. (2003). Preventing student dropout in distance learning using machine learning techniques. In V. Palade, R. J. Howlett & L. Jain (Eds.), Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45226-3_37
Khoshsima, H., Saed, A., & Arbabi, M. (2018). Online teachers’ attitudes toward using technology in teaching English as a foreign language. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(2), 134-148.
Kubischta, F. (2014). Engagement and motivation: Questioning students on study motivation, engagement, and study strategies [Bachelor’s thesis, Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences]. Haaga-Helia University Digital Archive. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/38108637.pdf
Kurnaz, A., Arslantas, S., & Pursun, T. (2020). Investigation of the effectiveness of personalized book advice smart application on secondary school students’ reading motivation. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(3), 587-602. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.3.587
Mofareh, A. A. (2019). The use of technology in English language teaching. Frontiers in Education Technology, 2(3), 168-180. https://doi.org/10.22158/fet.v2n3p168
Nozhovnik, O. M. (2015). Angliiska dlia rosuminnia hlobalisatisii [English for globalisation awareness]. Publishing House for “KROK” University of Economics and Law /Vydavnytstvo Universytetu Ekonomiky ta Prava ”KROK”. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F5-7TBiJ_5ad-2XqPKM6w1URYaXfirtb/view?usp=sharing
Pintrich, P. R., & Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
Price, P., Jhangiani, R., & Chiang, I. (2015). Research Methods in Psychology (2nd Canadian ed.). BCcampus. https://opentextbc.ca/researchmethods/
Price, J. H., & Murnan, J. (2004). Research limitations and the necessity of reporting them. American Journal of Health Education, 35 (2), 66-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2004.10603611
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539-569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Psychology Today. (2020a). Mental Speed Test (MST) (Version 1). https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/tests/iq/mental-speed-test-version-1
Psychology Today (2020b). Time Management Skills Test (TMST). https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/tests/career/time-management-skills-test
Rodrigues, I. B., Adachi, J. D., Beattie, K. A., & MacDermid, J. C. (2017). Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers, and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5
Santipolo, M. (2017). Bespoke Language Teaching (BLT): A proposal for a theoretical framework. The case of EFL/ELF for Italians. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.2.4
Sari, A. M., & Nurcahyo, H. (2018). Improving students learning motivation through mobile learning. Indonesian Journal of Biology Education/ Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 4(3), 271-276. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i3.6859
Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). Wie man ein Mixed Methods-Forschungs-Design konstruiert [How to construct a mixed methods research design]. Cologne Journal of Sociology and Social Psychology/ Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(2), 107-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
Shykhnenko, K., & Nozhovnik, O. (2020). ESP course delivered to personnel working in shifts for the state emergency service of Ukraine through a student-tailored model. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(3), 295‒309. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.3.16
Sinclair, S., & Rockwell, G. (2003). Voyant Tools. VOYANT. https://voyant-tools.org/
Son, J.‐B. (2018). Technology in English as a foreign language (EFL) teaching. Wiley Online Library. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0448
Talmo, T., Einum, E., & Støckert, R. (2014). Bring your own device to language class – applying handheld devices in classroom learning. In S. Jager, L. Bradley, E. J. Meima, & S. Thouësny (Eds), CALL Design: Principles and Practice, Proceedings of the 2014 EUROCALL Conference, Groningen (pp. 352-357). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2014.000244
Wasfy, H. M., Wasfy, T. M., Mahfouz, R. M., & Peters, J. (2013). The education sector revolution: The automation of education. In Proceedings of the 120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 1-19). American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--22573
Xavier, M., & Meneses, J. (2020). Dropout in online higher education: A scoping review from 2014 to 2018. eLearn Center for Open University of Catalonia/eLearn Center for Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. https://doi.org/10.7238/uoc.dropout.factors.2020
Zhidkoff, R. (2020). Using chatbots in e-learning. Chatbots Life. https://chatbotslife.com/using-chatbots-in-e-learning-dacde1d245e5