logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Christiaan Huygensstraat 44, Zipcode:7533XB, Enschede, THE NETHERLANDS
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
Christiaan Huygensstraat 44, Zipcode:7533XB, Enschede, THE NETHERLANDS
Research Article

Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT in Higher Education: A Study of Academic Enhancement, Procrastination, and Ethical Concerns

Komal Uppal , Shiva Hajian

The integration of AI tools in education is reshaping how students view and interact with their learning experiences. As AI usage continues to grow, i.


  • Pub. date: January 15, 2025
  • Online Pub. date: December 26, 2024
  • Pages: 199-211
  • 108 Downloads
  • 531 Views
  • 0 Citations
T

The integration of AI tools in education is reshaping how students view and interact with their learning experiences. As AI usage continues to grow, it becomes increasingly important to understand how students' perceptions of AI technology impact their academic performance and learning behaviours. To investigate these effects, we conducted a correlational study with a sample of 44 students to examine the relationship between students' perceptions of ChatGPT’s utility—focusing on usage frequency, perceived usefulness, accuracy, reliability, and time efficiency—and key academic outcomes, including content mastery, confidence in knowledge, and grade improvement. Additionally, we explored how these perceptions influence student behaviours, such as reliance on ChatGPT, procrastination tendencies, and the potential risk of plagiarism. The canonical correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between students' perceptions of ChatGPT's utility and their academic outcomes. Students who viewed ChatGPT as reliable and efficient tended to report higher grades, improved understanding of the material, and greater confidence in their knowledge. Furthermore, the bivariate correlation analysis revealed a significant relationship between dependency on ChatGPT and procrastination (r = 0.546, p < .001), indicating that a higher reliance on AI tools may contribute to increased procrastination. No statistically significant association was identified between ChatGPT dependency and the risk of plagiarism. Future research should prioritize the development of strategies that promote the effective use of AI while minimizing the risk of over-reliance. Such efforts can enhance academic integrity and support independent learning. Educators play a critical role in this process by guiding students to balance the advantages of AI with the cultivation of critical thinking skills and adherence to ethical academic practices.

Keywords: AI-assisted learning, ChatGPT, ethical concerns, learning outcomes, student perceptions.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
108
Download
531
Citations
Crossref
0

Scopus
0

References

Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484  

Balım, A. G. (2009). The Effects of discovery learning on students’ success and inquiry learning skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research35, 1-20. https://bit.ly/3ZkeQVO

Bannert, M. (2002). Managing cognitive load-recent trends in cognitive load theory. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 139-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00021-4 

Beltozar-Clemente, S., Díaz-Vega, E., Zapata-Paulini, J., & Tejeda-Navarrete, R. E. (2024). We can rely on ChatGPT as an educational tutor: A cross-sectional study of its performance, accuracy, and limitations in university admission tests. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 14(1), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v14i1.46787

Biswas, S. (2023). Role of Chat GPT in education. Journal of ENT Surgery Research, 1(1), 1-3. https://bit.ly/4faM9kb

Chakraborty Samant, A., Tyagi, I., Vybhavi, J., Jha, H., & Patel, J. (2024). ChatGPT dependency disorder in healthcare practice: An Editorial. Cureus, 16(8), Article e66155. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.66155

Chan, C. K. Y., & Tsi, L. H. Y. (2024). Will generative AI replace teachers in higher education? A study of teacher and student perceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, Article 101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101395

Chang, D. H., Lin, M. P.-C., Hajian, S., & Wang, Q. Q. (2023). Educational design principles of using AI chatbot that supports self-regulated learning in education: Goal setting, feedback, and personalization. Sustainability, 15(17), Article 12921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712921

Chellappa, V., & Luximon, Y. (2024). Understanding the perception of design students towards ChatGPT. Computers and Education. Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 100281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100281

Chen, L., Zaharia, M., & Zou, J. (2023). How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time? arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09009. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.5317da47

Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A classification tool to foster self-regulated learning with Generative Artificial Intelligence by applying self-determination theory: A case of ChatGPT. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72, 2401-2416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-024-10366-w

Cho, H. J., Melloch, M. R., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2021). Enhanced student perceptions of learning and performance using concept-point-recovery teaching sessions: A mixed-method approach. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00276-1

Choudhury, A., & Shamszare, H. (2023). Investigating the impact of user trust on the adoption and use of ChatGPT: Survey analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, Article e47184. https://doi.org/10.2196/47184

Chu, S. K.-W., & Law, N. (2007). Development of information search expertise: Postgraduates’ knowledge of searching skills. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 7(3), 295-316. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2007.0028

Clark, T. M. (2023). Investigating the use of an Artificial Intelligence chatbot with general chemistry exam questions. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(5), 1905-1916. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00027

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Das, S. R., & J. V., M. (2024). Perceptions of higher education students towards ChatGPT usage. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(1), 86-106. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.583

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-determination theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1(20), 416-436. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21

Degirmenci, N., Baglama, B., & Yucesoy, Y. (2020). The use of technology in dyslexia: An analysis of recent trends. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(5), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i05.11921

Elali, F. R., & Rachid, L. N. (2023). AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community. Patterns4(3), Article 100706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100706

Farhi, F., Jeljeli, R., Aburezeq, I., Dweikat, F. F., Al-shami, S. A., & Slamene, R. (2023). Analyzing the students’ views, concerns, and perceived ethics about Chat GPT usage. Computers and Education. Artificial Intelligence, 5, Article 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180

Fauzi, F., Tuhuteru, L., Sampe, F., Ausat, A. M. A., & Hatta, H. R. (2023). Analyzing the role of ChatGPT in improving student productivity in higher education. Journal on Education, 5(4), 14886-14891. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2563   

Firaina, R., & Sulisworo, D. (2023). Exploring the usage of ChatGPT in higher education: Frequency and impact on productivity. Buletin Edukasi Indonesia, 2(01), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.56741/bei.v2i01.310

Fullan, M., Azorín, C., Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence and school leadership: Challenges, opportunities and implications. School Leadership and Management, 44(4), 339-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2023.2246856

Glaser, N. (2023). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT as an educational technology: An emerging technology report. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28, 1945-1952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09684-4

Grájeda, A., Burgos, J., Córdova, P., & Sanjinés, A. (2024). Assessing student-perceived impact of using artificial intelligence tools: Construction of a synthetic index of application in higher education. Cogent Education, 11(1), Article 2287917. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2287917

Hadi Mogavi, R., Deng, C., Kim, J. J., Zhou, P., Kwon, Y. D., Metwally, A. H. S., Tlili, A., Bassanelli, S., Bucchiarone, A., Gujar, S., Nacke, L. E., & Hui, P. (2024). ChatGPT in education: A blessing or a curse? A qualitative study exploring early adopters’ utilization and perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), Article 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100027

Hajian, S. (2021). What types of feedback enhance the effectiveness of self-explanation in a simulation-based learning environment? [Doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University]. Simon Fraser University. https://bit.ly/3V1HF8b

Hajian, S., Jain, M., Liu, A. L., Obaid, T., Fukuda, M., Winne, P. H., & Nesbit, J. C. (2021). Enhancing scientific discovery learning by just-in-time prompts in a simulation-assisted inquiry environment. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 989-1007. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.989

Hajian, S., Obaid, T., Jain, M., & Nesbit, J. (2019). Inquiry learning with an interactive physics simulation: What exploratory strategies lead to success? Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 30(4), 451-476. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/210235/

Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., Khan, S., & Khan, I. H. (2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT Tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), Article 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115

Johnson, D., Goodman, R., Patrinely, J., Stone, C., Zimmerman, E., Donald, R., Chang, S., Berkowitz, S., Finn, A., Jahangir, E., Scoville, E., Reese, T., Friedman, D., Bastarache, J., van der Heijden, Y., Wright, J., Carter, N., Alexander, M., Choe, J., … Wheless, L. (2023). Assessing the accuracy and reliability of AI-Generated medical responses: An evaluation of the Chat-GPT model. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2566942/v1

Kalyuga, S. (2009). Managing cognitive load in adaptive ICT-based learning. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, 7(5), 16-21. https://bit.ly/4fX1Zj1

Kamalov, F., Santandreu Calonge, D., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), Article 12451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451

Karr-Wisniewski, P., & Lu, Y. (2010). When more is too much: Operationalizing technology overload and exploring its impact on knowledge worker productivity. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1061-1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.008

Khan, R. A., Jawaid, M., Khan, A. R., & Sajjad, M. (2023). ChatGPT - Reshaping medical education and clinical management. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 39(2), 605-607. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.7653

Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00014-7

Kokku, R., Sundararajan, S., Dey, P., Sindhgatta, R., Nitta, S., & Sengupta, B. (2018). Augmenting Classrooms with AI for personalized education. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), (pp. 6976-6980). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2018.8461812

Lange, C. (2023). The relationship between e-learning personalisation and cognitive load. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 38(3), 228-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.2019577

Licorish, S. A., Owen, H. E., Daniel, B., & George, J. L. (2018). Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13, Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-018-0078-8

Lo, C. K., Hew, K. F., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2024). The influence of ChatGPT on student engagement: A systematic review and future research agenda. Computers and Education, 219, Article 105100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105100

Magalhães Araujo, S., & Cruz-Correia, R. (2024). Incorporating ChatGPT in medical informatics education: Mixed methods study on student perceptions and experiential integration proposals. JMIR Medical Education, 10, Article e51151. https://doi.org/10.2196/51151

McKnight, P. E., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being: An integrative, testable theory. Review of General Psychology, 13(3), 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017152

Meyer, J. G., Urbanowicz, R. J., Martin, P. C. N., O’Connor, K., Li, R., Peng, P.-C., Bright, T. J., Tatonetti, N., Won, K. J., Gonzalez-Hernandez, G., & Moore, J. H. (2023). ChatGPT and large language models in academia: Opportunities and challenges. BioData Mining, 16, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-023-00339-9

Ngo, T. T. A. (2023). The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(17), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019

Nguyen, A., Kremantzis, M., Essien, A., Petrounias, I., & Hosseini, S. (2024). Enhancing student engagement through Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the basics, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.53761/caraaq92

Nguyen, Q. N., & Sidorova, A. (2018). Understanding user interactions with a chatbot: A self-determination theory approach. AMCIS 2018 Proceedings, 3. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2018/HCI/Presentations/3

Nguyen Minh, A. (2024). Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing English writing skills and critical thinking in university freshmen. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology, 3(2), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.60087/jklst.vol3.n2.p62 

Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom. Theory and research in education, 7(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318

Opara, E. C., Adalikwu, M.-E. T. Regular users, & Tolorunleke, C. A. (2023). ChatGPT for teaching, learning and research: Prospects and Challenges. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2023.v05i02.001

OpenAI. (n.d.). What is ChatGPT? OpenAI Help Center. https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6783457-what-is-chatgpt 

Polyportis, A. (2024). A longitudinal study on Artificial Intelligence adoption: Understanding the drivers of ChatGPT usage behavior change in higher education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 1324398. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1324398

Rajala, J., Hukkanen, J., Hartikainen, M., & Niemelä, P. (2023). "\"Call me Kiran\"– ChatGPT as a tutoring Chatbot in a computer science course. In Proceedings of the International Academic Mindtrek Conference (pp. 83-94). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3616961.3616974

Romero-Rodríguez, J., Ramírez-Montoya, M., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Lara-Lara, F. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at university as a tool for complex thinking: Students' perceived usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 323-339. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458

Roumeliotis, K. I., & Tselikas, N. D. (2023). ChatGPT and Open-AI models: A preliminary review. Future Internet, 15(6), Article 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15060192

Rutkowski, A.-F., & Saunders, C. S. (2018). Emotional and cognitive overload: The dark side of information technology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167275  

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Sadegh-Zadeh, S.-A., Movahhedi, T., Hajiyavand, A. M., & Dearn, K. D. (2023). Exploring undergraduates’ perceptions of and engagement in an AI-enhanced online course. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1252543. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1252543  

Selwyn, N. (2017). Education and technology: Key issues and debates (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474235952

Shoufan, A. (2023). Exploring students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: Thematic analysis and follow-up survey. IEEE Access11, 38805-38818. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3268224

Singh, H., Tayarani-Najaran, M.-H., & Yaqoob, M. (2023). Exploring computer science students’ perception of ChatGPT in higher education: A descriptive and correlation study. Education Sciences, 13(9), Article 924. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090924

Siregar, F. H., Hasmayni, B., & Lubis, A. H. (2023). The analysis of ChatGPT usage impact on learning motivation among scout students. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(7), 632-638. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230774

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre, & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Cognition in education (pp. 37-76). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8

Sweller, J. (2020). Cognitive load theory and educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09701-3

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.

Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 6695-6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8 

Tossell, C. C., Tenhundfeld, N. L., Momen, A., Cooley, K., & de Visser, E. J. (2024). Student perceptions of ChatGPT use in a college essay assignment: Implications for learning, grading, and trust in artificial intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 1069-1081. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2024.3355015

Vaccino-Salvadore, S. (2023). Exploring the ethical dimensions of using ChatGPT in language learning and beyond. Languages, 8(3), Article 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8030191

Valova, I., Mladenova, T., & Kanev, G. (2024). Students’ perception of ChatGPT usage in education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 15(1), 466-473. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2024.0150143

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x

Venkatesh, V., Davis, F., & Morris, M. G. (2007). Dead or alive? The development, trajectory and future of technology adoption research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00120  

Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., & Kollar, I. (2022). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education54(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455

Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7

...