A Meta-Analysis of Instructional Management Models Affecting Creative Thinking Development
The main objective of this research was to study the effects of instructional management models and nominal variables on the development of students&r.
- Pub. date: October 15, 2022
- Pages: 2069-2085
- 477 Downloads
- 487 Views
- 2 Citations
The main objective of this research was to study the effects of instructional management models and nominal variables on the development of students’ creative thinking. The researchers used the research synthesis of 400 studies on the development of students' creative thinking by a meta-analysis of research according to Cohen. The meta-analysis results revealed that the average effect size of the instructional management model (d = 3.43; [3.10, 3.17]) was positive and had a very high effect size with statistical significance. The most significant influence on the creative thinking development model was creative development theory (d = 4.217; [3.32, 5.11]). In addition, effect sizes varied with the attribute variables of the research, particularly the attribute variable of the research on instruction with the highest effect consisted of research with the focus on language, at the primary level, applied Torrance's creativity theory, designed between one to six lesson plans. Moreover, there was less than one hour per plan, the instructional period including the experiment conducted more than 31 hours and there were four weeks of instruction. In addition, there were six steps for instruction, there had quiz as an assessment tool, number of exams varied between 30 and 39 questions, and knowledge sheets were used as instructional materials. In the context of the meta-analysis, the findings indicated that the teachers should apply creative development theory in developing the students’ creative thinking for more effective instructional management.
Keywords: Creative thinking, instructional management model, meta-analysis, research synthesis.
References
Alacapınar, F. G., & Uysal, H. (2020). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the method of creative drama in math courses in regard to student scores in achievement, attitude and retention. Research in Pedagogy, 10(2), 265-284. http://doi.org/10.5937/IstrPed2002265G
Algahtani, F. (2017). Teaching students with intellectual disabilities: Constructivism or behaviorism? Educational Research and Reviews, 12(21), 1031-1035. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2017.3366
Alinaghi, N., & Reed, W. R. (2018). Meta-analysis and publication bias: How well does the FAT-PET-PEESE procedure work? Research Synthesis Methods, 9(2), 285-311. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1298
Anwar, K., & Wardhono, A. (2019). Students' perception of learning experience and achievement motivation: Prototyping English for Academic Purposes (EAP). International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 271-288. http://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12317a
Austin, P. C. (2011). Comparing paired vs non-paired statistical methods of analyses when making inferences about absolute risk reductions in propensity-score matched samples. Statistics in Medicine, 30(1), 1292-1301. http://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4200
Aytaç, T., & Kula, S. S. (2020). The effect of student-centered approaches on students' creative thinking skills: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(2), 62-80. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.723894
Balemen, N., & Keskin, M. Ö. (2018). The effectiveness of project-based learning on science education: A meta-analysis search. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(4), 849-865. https://bit.ly/3yTbOf6
Barber, J. P. (2012). Integration of learning: A grounded theory analysis of college students learning. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 590–617. https://doi.org/gjkzcc
Berežný, Š. (2017). Laboratories for teaching of mathematical subjects. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.10.1.3
Bom, P. R. D., & Rachinger, H. (2019). A kinked meta-regression model for publication bias correction. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(4), 497-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1352
Borenstein, M. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Biostat, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J., & Rothstein, H. R. (2015). Regression in meta-analysis. Biostat, Inc. https://bit.ly/3AG94mG
Bron, M., & Barrio, M. G. (2019). Project-based learning for teaching transmedia communication. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 7(1), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v0i0.2405
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Longman. https://bit.ly/3AEE2vy
Bush, M. (1978). Preliminary considerations for a psychoanalytic theory of insight: Historical perspective. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 5(1), 1-13. https://bit.ly/3P28XGn
Cakir, N. K. (2017). Effect of 5e learning model on academic achievement, attitude and science process skills: Meta-analysis study. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(11), 157. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i11.2649
Card, N. A. (2012). Applied meta-analysis for social science research. A Division of Guilford Publication, Inc. https://doi.org/h859
Ciğerci, F. M. (2020). Primary school teacher candidates and 21st century skills. International Journal of Progressive Education, 16(2), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2020.241.11
Clayson, J. E. (2021). Broadening constructionism through visual modelling: My self as subject and object. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1143-1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13086
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://bit.ly/3A8r1cS
Collins, J. W., & O'Brien, N. P. (2011). The greenwood dictionary of education (2nd ed.). Greenwood Press. https://bit.ly/3BTvAcz
Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). Russell Sage Foundation. https://bit.ly/3bIVg0D
Cooper, S., Endacott, R., & Chapman, Y. (2009). Qualitative research: Specific designs for qualitative research in emergency care. Emergency Medicine Journal, 26(11), 773-776. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2008.071159
Csizmadia, A., Standl, B., & Waite, J. (2019). Integrating the constructionist learning theory with computational thinking classroom activities. Informatics in Education, 18(1), 41-67. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.03
Dani, D., Hallman-Thrasher, A., & Litchfield, E. (2018). Creative assessments. Science Teacher, 85(5), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst18_085_05_46
Danielson, K., Wong, K. M., & Neuman, S. B. (2019). Vocabulary in educational media for preschoolers: A content analysis of word selection and screen-based pedagogical supports. Journal of Children and Media, 13(3), 345-362. https://doi.org/h86c
Desai, F. P. (2020). Teaching English through drama to tribal students of undergraduate level at remote area of south Gujarat region in India. Education Quarterly Reviews, 3(4), 521-537. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.03.04.159
Dowdy, A., Tincani, M., & Schneider, W. J. (2020). Evaluation of publication bias in response interruption and redirection: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(4), 2151-2171. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.724
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. British Medical Journal, 315, 629-634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
Er-Türküresin, H. (2020). The effect of using creative drama method on student achievement in the social studies course: A meta-analysis study. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(4), 1881-1896.
Fakhrou, A. A., & Ghareeb, S. A. (2020). The effectiveness of a proposed program titled (creativity lamp) in raising the primary school students' academic achievement and promoting creativity among them in Kuwait. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 9(3), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v9n3p20
Ferguson, P. K. (2020). Cooperative learning in Swedish classrooms: Engagement and relationships as a focus for culturally diverse students. Education Sciences, 10(11), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110312
Firdaus, A. R., & Rahayu, G. D. S. (2019). Effect of stem-based learning on the cognitive skills improvement. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 6(2), 198-207. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i2.17562
Gajda, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.002
Gero, A., & Levin, I. (2019). Computational thinking and constructionism: Creating difference equations in spreadsheets. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(5), 779-787. https://doi.org/ggdpcs
Giesinger, J. (2017). The special goods of childhood: Lessons from social constructionism. Ethics and Education, 12(2), 201-217. https://doi.org/h86d
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(1), 486-504. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486
Herdem, D. Ö. (2019). A comparison of self-leadership characteristics of the students of department of fine arts and the others "The case of Gazi University". Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070125
Hobbs, R., & Friesem, Y. (2019). The creativity of imitation in remake videos. E-Learning and Digital Media, 16(4), 328-347. https://doi.org/gf8wkb
Hong, G., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). Effects of kindergarten retention policy on children's cognitive growth in reading and mathematics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(1), 205-224. https://doi.org/dsbr8h
Hoover, E., & Harder, M. K. (2015). What lies beneath the surface? The hidden complexities of organizational change for sustainability in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 175–188. https://doi.org/ggfsw3
Hornby, A. S., & Crowther, J. (1995). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
In'am, A., & Sutrisno, E. S. (2021). Strengthening students' self-efficacy and motivation in learning mathematics through the cooperative learning model. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 395-410. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14123a
Itzhak, Y., Elaine, L. Z., & Robert, H. (2005). Estimating causal effects of public health education campaigns using propensity score methodology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28(2), 209-220. https://doi.org/ctdc8j
Karatas, K., & Zeybek, G. (2020). The role of the academic field in the relationship between self-directed learning and 21st century skills. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(2), 33-52. https://bit.ly/3nP9y2c
Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2-3), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-473
Kirikkaleli, D., Ertugrul, H. M., Sari, A., Ozun, A., & Kiral, H. (2021). Quality of education and technological readiness: Bootstrap panel causality analysis for Northern European countries. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(2), 276–287. https://doi.org/h86b
Klein, J. T. (2017). The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://bit.ly/3w4mi9S
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (1998). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Gulf Publishing. https://doi.org/fx7rb3
Köseler, C., & Kalyon, S. (2020). Impact of argument-based laboratory method on scientific process skills of pre-service primary school teachers and their views of the nature of science. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 9(4), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v9n4p75
Lamb, R., Lin, J., & Firestone, J. B. (2020). Virtual reality laboratories: A way forward for schools? EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), 1856-1866. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8206
Leadbetter, P., Bussu, A., & Richards, M. (2019). Emotive outdoor learning experiences in higher education: Personal reflections and evidence. Psychology Teaching Review, 25(1), 67-71. https://bit.ly/3AyJ8cG
Lipsey, M., & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE. https://bit.ly/3Ap2MWI
McLain, T. R. (2019). Social media treasure hunt-practical lessons using Twitter in the English classroom. Teaching English with Technology, 19(2), 88-100. https://bit.ly/3yufp1Z
National Institute of Educational Testing Service. (2020). Ordinary national educational test 2020. https://bit.ly/3TdpsSt
Niazi, M. K., Asghar, M. A., & Ali, R. (2018). Effect of science laboratory environment on cognitive development of students. Pakistan Journal of Distance and Online Learning, 4(1), 123-134. https://bit.ly/3at9gec
Nogueira, S. I., Almeida, L. S., & Lima, T. S. (2017). Two tracks of thought: A structural model of the test for creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP). Creativity Research Journal, 29(2), 206-211. https://doi.org/fnfx
Özyurt, H., & Özyurt, Ö. (2020). Reflections of design-based research approach on learning experience of visual programming course. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2020057981
Pavelescu, L. M. (2019). Motivation and emotion in the EFL learning experience of Romanian adolescent students: Two contrasting cases. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 55-82. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.1.4
Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470754887
Quint, J., & Condliffe, B. (2018). Project-based learning: A promising approach to improving student outcomes. ERIC. https://bit.ly/3ywDpBy
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-640. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638
Royston, R., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2019). Creative self-efficacy as mediator between creative mindsets and creative problem-solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(4), 472-481. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.226
Shah, B., & Gustafsson, E. (2021). Exploring the effects of age, gender, and school setting on children's creative thinking skills. Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(2), 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.480
Stuart, E. A., Cole, S. R., Bradshaw, C., & Leaf, P. (2011). The use of propensity scores to assess the generalizability of results from randomized trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A -Statistics in Society, 174(2), 369-386. https://doi.org/fqrkqz
Tarik, T. (2020). The effect of simulation technique on academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(1) 17-36. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.141
Taylor, C. L., & Kaufman, J. C. (2021). Values across creative domains. Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(2), 501-516. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.470
Thalheimer, W., & Cook, S. (2002). How to calculate effect sizes from published research articles: A simplified methodology. Work-Learning Research. https://bit.ly/3OVdeeE
Thangamani, U., & Eu, L. K. (2019). Students' achievement in symmetry of two dimensional shapes using geometer's sketchpad. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(1), 14-22. https://bit.ly/3IpAorg
Thoemmes, F., & Kim, E. S. (2011). A systematic review of propensity score methods in the social sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(1), 90-118. https://doi.org/d5759d
Tran, V. D. (2019). Does cooperative learning increase students' motivation in learning? International Journal of Higher Education, 8(5) 12-20. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n5p12
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons. https://bit.ly/3Rkas4i
Tufan, A. (2020). The problems faced by teachers in Turkey during the COVID-19 pandemic and their opinions. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(1), 404-420. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.329.26
Ulger, K. (2019). Comparing the effects of art education and science education on creative thinking in high school students. Arts Education Policy Review, 120(2), 57-79. https://doi.org/h86f
Ulubey, Ö. (2018). The effect of creative drama as a method on skills: A meta-analysis study. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(4), 63-78. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i4.2968
Ummah, S. K., In'am, A., & Azmi, R. D. (2019). Creating manipulatives: Improving students' creativity through project-based learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5093.93-102
Wang, G. (2020). On the application of cooperative learning in college English teaching. International Education Studies, 13(6), 62-66. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n6p62
Weurlander, M., Scheja, M., Hult, H., & Wernerson, A. (2016). The struggle to understand: Exploring medical students’ experiences of learning and understanding during a basic Science course. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 462–477. https://doi.org/f3m5w3
William, W. R. (1979). On behavioral theories of reference. Philosophy of Science, 46(2), 175-203. https://doi.org/10.1086/288861
Yurt, E., & Polat, S. (2015). The effectiveness of multiple intelligence applications on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(1), 84-122. https://doi.org/10.17499/jsser.75161