logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
learner model multiple intelligences screening test thai education

Development of the Multiple Intelligences Promotion Model for Thai Learners

Panat Chanpleng , Ammara Wisuttranukul , Jomtup Khwanrat , Siwaporn Poopan , Kanchana Pattrawiwat , Wichuda Kijtorntham , Kunakorn Phonsuwan

Recently, Thailand's educational policy focused on developing learners’ potential according to multiple intelligences. The research objectiv.

R

Recently, Thailand's educational policy focused on developing learners’ potential according to multiple intelligences. The research objectives were to develop the multiple intelligences (MI) promotion model and an MI screening test for Thai learners and propose policies to encourage MI so that learners can reach their full potential. The sequential mixed method was applied. First, the model and the MI screening test were developed. The participants were two groups of key informants, comprising 93 and 185 participants, respectively. The sample group consisted of 460 primary and secondary school students selected through multistage random sampling. The MI screening test consisted of characteristics of 45 behavioral observations. The result showed that the developing model was the “A2D model or AAD.” This model consisted of three components: nine areas of intelligence, eight continuity mechanisms, and two success conditions. The MI screening result revealed that most learners had outstanding bodily–kinesthetic intelligence, accounting for 40.4%. The least prominent aspect was musical intelligence, representing 16.2%. The proposal policies comprised (a) The aspect of foundation for learning management with access to the A2D model, consisting of four sub-policy proposals, and (b) The aspect of encouraging learners to develop their full potential, consisting of six sub-policy proposals.

Keywords: Learner, model, multiple intelligences, screening test, Thai education.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
269
Download
340
Citations
Crossref
0

Scopus
0

References

Armstrong, T. (2000). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Biggs, J. B. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 8(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436890080102

Cherry, K. (2002). Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. Very Well Mind. http://bit.ly/3jshAzy

Dechagupt, Y. (2007). The construction of a multiple intelligences model for learning in Thai culture. Thai Ed.Research. https://bit.ly/3xVijwG [In Thai]

Dix, K. L. (2007). A longitudinal study examining the impact of ICT adoption on students and teachers [Doctoral dissertation, Flinders University]. Australian Council of Educational Research. https://works.bepress.com/katherine_dix/7/

Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basics Books.

Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176460

Gilliam, W. S., Meisels, S., & Mayers, L. (2005). Screening and surveillance in early intervention systems. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), A developmental systems approach to early intervention: National and international perspectives (pp. 73–98).  Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Hajhashemi, K., Akef, K., & Anderson, N. (2012). The relationship between multiple intelligences and reading proficiency of Iranian EFL students. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(10), 1475-1483. https://bit.ly/3IxOOpM

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2) 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Mankad, K. (2015). The role of multiple intelligence in e-learning. International Journal of Scientific Research and Development, 3(5), 1076-1081. https://bit.ly/3IYY8o1

Mbuva, J. M. (2003). Implementation of the multiple intelligences theory in the 21st century teaching and learning environments: A new tool for effective teaching and learning in all levels (ED573929). ERIC. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED476162.pdf

Meleen, M. (2019). Classroom activities for multiple intelligences. Love to Know. http://bit.ly/3SwaMxM

Murray, S., & Moore, K. (2012). Inclusion through multiple intelligences. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 2(1), 42-48. https://ro.uow.edu.au/jseem/vol2/iss1/8

Özdemir, P., Güneysu, Ş., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Enhancing learning through. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 74-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656017

Wilson, S. D. (2018). Implementing co-creation and multiple intelligence practices to transform the classroom experience. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 11(4), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v11i4.10206

Yaumi, M., Sirate, S. S. F., & Patak, A. A. (2018). Investigating multiple intelligence-based instructions approach on performance improvement of Indonesian elementary Madrasah teachers. SAGE Open, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018809216 

Yavich, R., & Rotnitsky, I. (2020). Multiple intelligences and success in school studies. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p107

 

 

...