How Students Generate Patterns in Learning Algebra? A Focus on Functional Thinking in Secondary School Students
This research aims to describe secondary school students' functional thinking in generating patterns in learning algebra, particularly in solving .
- Pub. date: April 15, 2023
- Pages: 913-925
- 376 Downloads
- 391 Views
- 0 Citations
This research aims to describe secondary school students' functional thinking in generating patterns in learning algebra, particularly in solving mathematical word problems. In addressing this aim, a phenomenological approach was conducted to investigate the meaning of functional relationships provided by students. The data were collected from 39 ninth graders (13-14 years old) through a written test about generating patterns in linear functions. The following steps were conducting interviews with ten representative students to get detailed information about their answers to the written test. All students' responses were then analyzed using the thematic analysis software ATLAS.ti. The findings illustrate that students employed two types of approaches in solving the problem: recursive patterns and correspondence. Students favored the recursive patterns approach in identifying the pattern. They provided arithmetic computation by counting term-to-term but could not represent generalities with algebraic symbols. Meanwhile, students evidenced for correspondence managed to observe the relation between two variables and create the symbolic representation to express the generality. The study concludes that these differences exist due to their focus on identifying patterns: the recursive pattern students tend to see the changes in one variable, whereas the correspondence ones relate to the corresponding pair of variables.
Keywords: Functional relationships, functional thinking, generalization, learning algebra.
References
Ayala-Altamirano, C., & Molina, M. (2020). Meanings attributed to letters in functional contexts by primary school students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 1271–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10012-5
Bajo-Benito, J. M., Gavilán-Izquierdo, J. M., & Sánchez-Matamoros García, G. (2023). The concept of number sequence in graphical representations for secondary school students. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.159
Basir, M. A., Waluya, S., Dwijanto, & Isnarto. (2021). Development and use of test instruments to measure algebraic reasoning based on cognitive systems in Marzano’s taxonomy. European Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 2(2), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmse.2.2.163
Blanton, M., Brizuela, B. M., Gardiner, A. M., Sawrey, K., & Newman-Owens, A. (2017). A progression in first-grade children’s thinking about variable and variable notation in functional relationships. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95, 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9745-0
Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 412–446. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034944
Cai, J., & Knuth, E. J. (2005). Introduction: The development of students’ algebraic thinking in earlier grades from curricular, instructional and learning perspectives. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 37, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655891
Carraher, D. W., & Schliemann, A. D. (2007). Early algebra and algebraic reasoning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 669–706). Information Age Publishing.
Carraher, D. W., Schliemann, A. D., Brizuela, B. M., & Earnest, D. (2006). Arithmetic and algebra in early mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(2), 87–115. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034843
Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1994). Exponential functions, rates of change, and the multiplicative unit. In P. Cobb, (Eds.), Learning mathematics (pp. 31–60). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2057-1_2
Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1995). Splitting, covariation, and their role in the development of exponential functions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.26.1.0066
Doorman, M., Drijvers, P., Gravemeijer, K., Boon, P., & Reed, H. (2012). Tool use and the development of the function concept: From repeated calculations to functional thinking. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10, 1243–1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9329-0
El Mouhayar, R. (2018). Trends of progression of student level of reasoning and generalization in numerical and figural reasoning approaches in pattern generalization. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99, 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9821-8
Günster, S. M., & Weigand, H. G. (2020). Designing digital technology tasks for the development of functional thinking. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52, 1259–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01179-1
Jupri, A., & Drijvers, P. (2016). Student difficulties in mathematizing word problems in algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9), 2481–2502. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1299a
Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5–17). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315097435-2
Kieran, C., Pang, J., Schifter, D., & Ng, S. F. (2016). Early algebra: Research into its Nature, its Learning, its Teaching. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32258-2
Kleiner, I. (1989). Evolution of the function concept: A brief survey. The College Mathematics Journal, 20(4), 282-300. https://doi.org/10.2307/2686848
Lichti, M., & Roth, J. (2018). How to foster functional thinking in learning environments using computer-based simulations or real materials. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1, 148–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-018-0007-1
Lucariello, J., Tine, M. T., & Ganley, C. M. (2014). A formative assessment of students’ algebraic variable misconceptions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.09.001
Lukman, Marsigit, Istiyono, E., Kartowagiran, B., Retnawati, H., Kistoro, H. C. A., & Putranta, H. (2021). Effective teachers’ personality in strengthening character education. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 512–521. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21629
Malisani, E., & Spagnolo, F. (2009). From arithmetical thought to algebraic thought: The role of the “variable.” Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71, 19–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9157-x
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publication. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. https://bit.ly/3SevHFJ
Nistal, A. A., Van Dooren, W., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). What counts as a flexible representational choice? An evaluation of students’ representational choices to solve linear function problems. Instructional Science, 40, 999–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9199-9
Pinto, E., & Cañadas, M. C. (2021). Generalizations of third and fifth graders within a functional approach to early algebra. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 33, 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-019-00300-2
Pinto, E., Cañadas, M. C., & Moreno, A. (2022). Functional relationships evidenced and representations used by third graders within a functional approach to early algebra. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20, 1183–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10183-0
Radford, L. (2006). Algebraic thinking and the generalization of patterns: A semiotic perspective. In S. Alatorre, J. L. Cortina, M. Sáiz & A. Méndez (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty Eighth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 2–21). Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. http://www.luisradford.ca/pub/60_pmena06.pdf
Radford, L. (2010). Algebraic thinking from a cultural semiotic perspective. Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800903569741
Ramírez, R., Brizuela, B. M., & Ayala-Altamirano, C. (2022). Word problems associated with the use of functional strategies among grade 4 students. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34, 317–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00346-7
Septiani, Y. M., Didi, S., & Endang, M. (2018). Student’ algebraic thinking level. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(9), 672–676. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.9.1120
Smith, E. (2008). Representational thinking as a framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 133–160). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315097435-6
Stephens, A. C., Fonger, N., Strachota, S., Isler, I., Blanton, M., Knuth, E., & Gardiner, A. M. (2017). A learning progression for elementary students’ functional thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 19(3), 143–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2017.1328636
Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In The ideas of algebra, K-12 (pp. 8-19). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://bit.ly/3XFHFcl
Verschaffel, L., Schukajlow, S., Star, J., & Van Dooren, W. (2020). Word problems in mathematics education: A survey. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52, 1–16. https:/doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01130-4
Vinner, S., & Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 356-366. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.20.4.0356
Wagner, S., & Parker, S. (1993). Advancing algebra. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), Research idea for the classroom: High school mathematics (pp. 119–139). Macmillan Publishing Company. https://bit.ly/3Z28B7d
Wahyuni, R., Prabawanto, S., & Herman, T. (2020). Students’ difficulties in solving algebra task in middle school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032071
Watanabe, T. (2011). Shiki: A critical foundation for school algebra in japanese elementary school mathematics. In J. Cai & E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives,(pp. 109-124). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_7
Wilkie, K. J. (2014). Upper primary school teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching functional thinking in algebra. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17, 397–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9251-6
Wilkie, K. J. (2016). Students’ use of variables and multiple representations in generalizing functional relationships prior to secondary school. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 93, 333–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9703-x
Wilkie, K. J., & Ayalon, M. (2018). Investigating years 7 to 12 students’ knowledge of linear relationships through different contexts and representations. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30, 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0236-8
Wilkie, K. J., & Clarke, D. M. (2016). Developing students’ functional thinking in algebra through different visualisations of a growing pattern’s structure. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28, 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0146-y
Woods, M., Paulus, T., Atkins, D. P., & Macklin, R. (2016). Advancing qualitative research using qualitative data analysis software (qdas)? Reviewing potential versus practice in published studies using Atlas.ti and Nvivo, 1994–2013. Social Science Computer Review, 34(5), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315596311