logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
critical thinking learning styles thought provoking questions

Teachers Underutilize Their Learning Styles in Developing Thought-Provoking Questions: A Case Study

Agustiani Putri , Abdur Rahman As’ari , Purwanto , Sharifah Osman , Selly Anastassia Amellia Kharis

Teachers' learning styles are a crucial part of the learning process as they determine how teachers' brains capture and integrate information .

T

Teachers' learning styles are a crucial part of the learning process as they determine how teachers' brains capture and integrate information linked with the senses. Kurnia, identified as an auditory teacher, was expected to capture written information in a provided numeracy problem. Nevertheless, she prefers to capture visual information, like tables or figures, and utilize them to develop thought-provoking questions. Thus, this study intends to investigate her reasons and the factors affecting Kurnia's decision to utilize visual information as a reference in developing questions. This research adopts a qualitative design covering a case study. Kurnia was selected from 32 teachers from 28 schools; roughly 43% were from public schools, and 57% from private schools. Kurnia placed more emphasis on pictorial information before proposing questions, which was caused by situational factors: the subject matter, the grade level, the student's engagement in the class, the teacher's experience, the teaching experience, and the diversity of students' learning styles. This article recommends that teachers recognize their learning styles to know their strengths and weaknesses in teaching mathematics, and that they convey understandable information utilizing effective instructional methods that represent each learning style of students in the classroom.

Keywords: Critical thinking, learning styles, thought-provoking questions.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
176
Download
175
Citations
Crossref
0

Scopus

References

Aaron, J. M. (2017). Auditory, visual, kinesthetic-tactile, and multi-sensory modalities: A quantitative study of how preferred modalities create more effective teaching and learning environments. Journal of Neuroscience and Behavioral Health, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5897/jnbh2016.0138

Abella, A., León, M. A.,Marco-Almagro, L., & Garcia, L. C. (2022). Perception evaluation kit: A case study with materials and learning styles. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 1941–1962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09676-4

Ahmad, A., Nasir, A. N., Buntat, Y., Kamin, Y., & Mohamad, M. M. (2018). Learning styles: How teachers accommodate in teaching strategies? Advanced Science Letters, 24(4), 2586–2590. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.11011

Akbarzadeh, M., & Fatemipour, H. (2014). Examining the match or mismatch between teaching style preferences and upper-intermediate EFL learners’ learning style preferences. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.399

Alhourani, A. Q. (2021). Investigating the match and mismatch between students’ learning styles and teacher’s teaching styles in a Saudi school: a case study. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices (JWEEP), 3(2), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.32996/jweep.2021.3.2.2

Alnujaidi, S. (2019). The difference between EFL students’ preferred learning styles and EFL teachers’ preferred teaching styles in Saudi Arabia. English Language Teaching, 12(1), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n1p90

As’ari, A. R., Kurniati, D., Abdullah, A. H., Muksar, M., & Sudirman, S. (2019). Impact of infusing truth-seeking and open-minded behaviors on mathematical problem-solving. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1019–1036. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.606031

Atabaki, A. M. S., Keshtiaray, N., & Yarmohammadian, M. H. (2015). Scrutiny of critical thinking concept. International Education Studies, 8(3), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n3p93

Bakker, C., de Glopper, K., & de Vries, S. (2022). Noticing as reasoning in lesson study teams in initial teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 113, Article 13656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103656

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554

Basri, H., Purwanto, As’ari, A. R., & Sisworo (2018). Investigating pre-service mathematics teacher critical thinking ability. International Journal of Insights for Mathematics Teaching, 01(2), 98–105. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/ijoimt/article/view/3421

Bostanci, Ö. (2020). Learning style preferences of prospective teachers of physical education and sport. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 6(2), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2020.62.231.236

Boström, L. (2011). Students’ learning styles compared with their teachers’ learning styles in upper secondary school – a mismatched combination. Education Inquiry, 1(3), 475-495. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v2i3.21995

Bracci, E., Tallaki, M., & Castellini, M. (2020). Learning preferences in accounting education: A focus on the role of visualization. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(2), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2018-0286

Brew, A., & Saunders, C. (2020). Making sense of research-based learning in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, Article 102935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102935

Butler, H. A., Pentoney, C., & Bong, M. P. (2017). Predicting real-world outcomes: Critical thinking ability is a better predictor of life decisions than intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 25, 38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.06.005

Cassibba, R., Ferrarello, D., Mammana, M. F., Musso, P., Pennisi, M., & Taranto, E. (2021). Teaching mathematics at distance: A challenge for universities. Education Sciences, 11(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010001

Cavas, B. (2010). A study on pre-service science, class and mathematics teachers’ learning styles in Turkey. Science Education International, 21(1), 47–61.

Chan, K. K. H., & Yung, B. H. W. (2018). Developing pedagogical content knowledge for teaching a new topic: More than teaching experience and subject matter knowledge. Research in Science Education, 48, 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9567-1

Cid, F. M., Suazo, A. G., Ferro, E. F., & Gonzales, J. A. (2012). Styles of visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learning of physical education students of the Uisek of Chile. Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala, 15(2), 405–415. https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDARTICULO=37951

Coskun, S. D., & Bostan, M. I. (2022). Comparison of pre-service elementary teachers’ mathematical knowledge in teaching for length measurement: Turkey and The United States. Pedagogical Research, 7(1), Article em0113. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/11517

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (3rd ed.). Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (4th ed.). Pearson.

Dalaman, O., Can, S., & Durukan, E. (2019). An investigation of pre-service basic education teachers learning styles in terms of different variables. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(5), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2019.3687

Dehghan, F. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of professionalism: A top-down or a bottom-up decision-making process? Professional Development in Education, 48(4), 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1725597

Doğan, A., & Yıldırım Sır, H. K. (2022). Development of primary school fourth- grade students’ fraction calculation strategies through the argumentation method. Journal of Education and Learning, 16(2), 254–264. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v16i2.20511

Dostov, S., Azamqulov, A., & Yusupov, A. (2022). Визуальный подход к высшей математике [Visual approach to higher mathematics]. Общество и Инновации, 3(2), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss2-pp211-216

Dreyer, C., & van der Walt, J. L. (1996). Learning and teaching styles: Empowering diverse learners in tertiary classrooms. Koers, 61(4), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.4102/koers.v61i4.611

Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching students through their individual learning styles. Reston Publishing Company

Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching secondary school students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 7-12. Pearson.

Dunn, R. S., & Dunn, K. J. (1979). Learning styles/teaching styles: Should they . . . can they . . . be matched? Educational Leadership, 36(4), 238–244. https://bit.ly/485p3sR

Elban, M. (2018). Learning styles as the predictor of academic success of the pre-service history teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 659–665. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.3.659

Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633

Farmer, R. W., Saner, S., Weingartner, L. A., & Rabalais, G. (2021). Questioning aid for rich, real-time discussion (QARRD): a tool to improve critical thinking in clinical settings. MedEdPORTAL, 17, Article 11132. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11132

Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Dole, S. (2014). Students’ perspectives on their numeracy development across the learning areas. In Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 473–492). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2_22

Geleta, A., Teshome, Z., & Zewdie, M. (2022). A study on the compatibility between EFL learners’ preferred learning styles and teachers’ teaching styles: Colleges of teachers’ education in Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 11(12), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2022.318

González-Campos, J. S., Arnedo-Moreno, J., & Sánchez-Navarro, J. (2022). Self-learning geometric transformations: A framework for the “before and after” style of exercises. Mathematics, 10(11), Article 1859. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10111859  

Goos, M., Geiger, V., Forgasz, H., Bennison, A., & Dole, S. (2018). Numeracy across the curriculum: Research-based strategies for enhancing teaching and learning. Routledge.

Greefrath, G., Siller, H.-S., Klock, H., & Wess, R. (2022). Pre-service secondary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for the teaching of mathematical modelling. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109, 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10038-z

Grieser, D. R., & Hendricks, K. S. (2018). Review of literature: Pedagogical content knowledge and string teacher preparation. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 37(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123318760970

Guler, M., & Celik, D. (2021). The effect of an elective algebra teaching course on prospective mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 16(2), Article em0636. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/10902

Hu, Y., Pan, Y., Shi, X., Cai, Q., Li, X., & Cheng, X. (2018). Inter-brain synchrony and cooperation context in interactive decision making. Biological Psychology, 133, 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.12.005

Krueger, A., & Sutton, J. (2001). Ed thoughts: What we know about science teaching and learning. Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.

Kurniati, D., Purwanto, P., As’ari, A. R., & Sa'dijah, C. (2020). Changes of the students’ truth-seeking behaviour during the infusion mathematics learning. TEM Journal, 9(4), 1711–1720. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM94-52

Lee, J.-E., & Hwang, S. (2022). Elementary students’ exploration of the structure of a word problem using representations. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 14(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2022.243

Lo, W. Y. (2020). Unpacking mathematics pedagogical content knowledge for elementary number theory: The case of arithmetic word problems. Mathematics, 8(10), Article 1750. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101750

Mahdjoubi, L., & Akplotsyi, R. (2012). The impact of sensory learning modalities on children’s sensitivity to sensory cues in the perception of their school environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(3), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.02.002

Mandinach, E. B., & Schildkamp, K. (2021). Misconceptions about data-based decision making in education: An exploration of the literature. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 69, Article 100842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100842

Medina Velandia, L. N., & Plazas-Gómez, L. A. (2018). Intelligent agents and the VARK model, propose learning strategies according to the way in which an individual assimilates. Revista Educación En Ingeniería, 13(26), 11–19. https://bit.ly/464pJgb

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey Bass.

Mirza, M. A., & Khurshid, K. (2020). Impact of VARK learning model at tertiary level education. International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, 14(5), 354–361. https://bit.ly/3Eyz30b

Moffett, P., & Eaton, P. (2018). The impact of the promoting early number talk project on the development of abstract representation in mathematics. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 26(4), 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2018.1487166

Moh’d, S. S., Uwamahoro, J., & Orodho, J. A. (2022). Analysis of mathematics lesson planning framed by the teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 1161–1182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.1161

Monrat, N., Phaksunchai, M., & Chonchaiya, R. (2022). Developing students’ mathematical critical thinking skills using open-ended questions and activities based on student learning preferences. Education Research International, 2022, Article 330363. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3300363

Muhtarom, Juniati, D., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2019). Examining prospective teachers’ belief and pedagogical content knowledge towards teaching practice in mathematics class: A case study. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.7326.185-202

Newton, P. M., & Miah, M. (2017). Evidence-based higher education - is the learning styles “myth” important? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00444

Pearl, A. O., Rayner, G. M., Larson, I., & Orlando, L. (2019). Thinking about critical thinking: An industry perspective. Industry and Higher Education, 33(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422218796099

Penkauskienė, D., Railienė, A., & Cruz, G. (2019). How is critical thinking valued by the labour market? employer perspectives from different European countries. Studies in Higher Education, 44(5), 804–815. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1586323

Phillips, A. M., Watkins, J., & Hammer, D. (2018). Beyond “asking questions”: Problematizing as a disciplinary activity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 982–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21477

Putri, A., As’ari, A. R., Purwanto, P., & Osman, S. (2022). The contribution of teachers’ learning styles in posing thought-provoking questions. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(4), 3705–3715. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.5983

Salmon, A. K., & Barrera, M. X. (2021). Intentional questioning to promote thinking and learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, Article 100822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100822

Şeker, H., & Kömür, S. (2008). The relationship between critical thinking skills and in-class questioning behaviours of English language teaching students. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760802420784

Sengsouliya, S., Soukhavong, S., Phonekeo, S., Sengsouliya, S., & Xaixanith, T. (2021). Mismatches in teachers’ teaching and students’ learning styles in English classes at a secondary school level: A case study of Laotian secondary schools. international Journal of Research in English Education, 6(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.52547/ijree.6.1.16

Shanmugavelu, G., Ariffin, K., Vadivelu, M., Mahayudin, Z., & Sundaram, M. A. R. K. (2020). Questioning techniques and teachers’ role in the classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 45–49. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3260

Sheromova, T. S., Khuziakhmetov, A. N., Kazinets, V. A., Sizova, Z. M., Buslaev, S. I., & Borodianskaia, E. A. (2020). Learning styles and development of cognitive skills in mathematics learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(11), Article em1895. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/8538

Shim, J. M., & Shur, A. M. (2018). Learning from ells’ perspectives: Mismatch between ell and teacher perspectives on ell learning experiences. English Language Teaching, 11(1), 21–32. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n1p21  

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Stake, R. E. (1994). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook qualitative research. SAGE Publications.

Stirling, B. V. (2017). Results of a study assessing teaching methods of faculty after measuring student learning style preference. Nurse Education Today, 55, 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.05.012

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Tican, C., & Deniz, S. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ opinions about the use of 21st century learner and 21st century teacher skills. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.181

Umbara, U., Munir, Susilana, R., & Puadi, E. F. W. (2020). Increase representation in mathematics classes: Effects of computer assisted instruction development with hippo animator. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(2), Article em0567. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/6262

VARK Learn Limited. (n.d.). The VARK modalities: What do visual, aural, read/write & kinesthetic really mean? https://shorturl.at/dDITV

Wasserman, N. H., Buchbinder, O., & Buchholtz, N. (2023). Making university mathematics matter for secondary teacher preparation. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55, 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01484-5

Wermke, W., Rick, S. O., & Salokangas, M. (2019). Decision-making and control: Perceived autonomy of teachers in Germany and Sweden. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(3), 306–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1482960

Wherfel, Q. M., Monda-Amaya, L., & Shriner, J. G. (2022). General education teacher practices: Assessment, decision-making and the influence of co-teaching. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 66(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2021.1934650

Widodo, S. A., & Wahyudin. (2018). Selection of learning media mathematics for junior school students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1), 154–160. http://tojet.net/volumes/v17i1.pdf

Wise, A. F., & Jung, Y. (2019). Teaching with analytics: Towards a situated model of instructional decision-making. Journal of Learning Analytics, 6(2), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2019.62.4

Yaakub, N., Rashid, R. A., Khairuddin, Z., Mohamed, A. F., & Nasir, N. A. M. (2021). Questioning level for critical thinking development in classroom teaching. RABBANICA - Journal of Revealed Knowledge, 2(2), 167–180. https://bit.ly/45OcVL5

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage.

Yusoff, W. M. W., & Seman, S. C. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge of higher order thinking and questioning skills: A case study at a primary school in Terengganu, Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(2), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v7-i2/4120

Zahner, D., & Corter, J. E. (2010). The process of probability problem solving: Use of external visual representations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986061003654240

Zeybek, G., & Şentürk, C. (2020). Analysis of pre-Service teachers’ learning styles according to Vermunt Learning Style Model. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(2), 669–682. https://bit.ly/44PBVQM 

...