logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
academic buoyancy congeneric reliability measurement invariance

The Academic Buoyancy Scale: Measurement Invariance across Culture and Gender in Egyptian and Omani Undergraduates

Mustafa Ali Khalaf , Mohammed A. A. Abulela

The academic buoyancy scale (ABS) is one of the most widely used instruments for measuring academic buoyancy. To obtain meaningful and valid compariso.

T

The academic buoyancy scale (ABS) is one of the most widely used instruments for measuring academic buoyancy. To obtain meaningful and valid comparisons across groups using ABS, however, measurement invariance should be ascertained a priori. To that end, we examined its measurement invariance, validity evidence based on relations to other variables, and score reliability using categorical omega across culture and gender among Egyptian and Omani undergraduates. Participants were 345 college students: Egyptian sample (N=191) and Omani sample (N=154). To assess measurement invariance across culture and gender, multiple–group confirmatory factor analysis was performed with four successive invariance models: (a) configural, (b) metric, (c) scalar, and (d) residual. Results revealed that the unidimensional baseline model had adequate fit to the data in the full sample. Moreover, measurement invariance was found to hold across culture but not across gender and consequently the ABS could be used to yield valid cross-cultural comparisons between the Egyptian and Omani students. Conversely, it cannot be used to yield valid inferences related to comparing gender groups within each culture. Validity evidence based on relations to other variables was supported by the significantly moderate correlation between ABS and academic achievement (GPA; r =.435 and r = .457, P < .01) for the Egyptian and Omani samples, respectively. With regard to score reliability, categorical omega coefficients were moderate across both samples. Educational and psychological implications, limitations and suggestions for improving the scale are discussed.

Keywords: Academic buoyancy, congeneric reliability, measurement invariance.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
989
Download
831
Citations
Crossref
5

Scopus
7

References

Abulela, M. A. A., & Davenport, E. C., Jr. (2020). Measurement invariance of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory-second edition (LASSI-II) across gender and discipline in Egyptian college students. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 20(2), 32 - 49. https://doi.org/10.12738/jestp.2020.2.003

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing (6th ed.). American Educational Research Association.

Bernardo, A. B. I. (2011). Lost in translation? Challenges in using psychological tests in the Philippines. Silliman Journal, 52(1), 21-45.

Bowen, D. (2010). Academic buoyancy: Investigating measures and developing a model of undergraduates’ everyday academic resilience [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Charles Sturt University.

Braten, I., & Olaussen, B. S. (1998). The learning and study strategies of Norwegian first year college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 10(4), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80125-3

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301

Cassidy, S. (2016). Academic resilience scale (ARS-30): A new multidimensional construct measure. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1787. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01787

Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of good of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Collie, R. J., Ginns, P., Martin, A. J., & Papworth, B. (2017). Academic buoyancy mediates academic anxiety’s effects on learning strategies: An investigation of English-and Chinese-speaking Australian students. Educational Psychology, 37(8), 947–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1291910

Datu, J. A., & Yang, W. (2018). Psychometric validity and gender invariance of the academic buoyancy scale in the Philippines: A construct validation approach. Journal of Psycho-educational Assessment, 36(3), 278-283. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0734282916674423

Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12046

Finch, H. W., French, B. F., & Hernández Finch, M. E., (2018). Comparison of methods for factor invariance testing of a 1-factor model with small samples and skewed latent traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 332. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00332  

Fong, C. J., & Kim, Y. W. (2021). A clash of constructs? Re-examining grit in light of academic buoyancy and future time perspective. Current Psychology, 40, 1824–1837.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0120-4

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Kanevsky, L., Corke, M., & Frangkiser, L. (2008). The academic resilience and psychosocial characteristics of inner-city English learners in a museum-based school program. Education and Urban Society, 40(4), 452-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124507304693

Kapikiran, S. (2012). Validity and reliability of the academic resilience scale in Turkish high school. Education, 132(3), 474-483.

Kelley, K. (2007). Methods for the behavioral, educational, and social sciences: An R package. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 979–984. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192993

Khalaf, M. A. (2014). Validity and reliability of the academic resilience scale in Egyptian context. US China Education Review B, 4(3), 202-210.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Kumar, V., & Sharma, K. (2020). Verification of academic buoyancy scale for adolescents in Indian context. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(6), 229- 234. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I6/PR260021

Martin, A. J. (2013). Academic buoyancy and academic resilience: Exploring ‘everyday’ and ‘classic’ resilience in the face of academic adversity. School Psychology International, 34(5), 488-500.https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034312472759  

Martin, A. J. (2014). Academic buoyancy and academic outcomes: Towards a further understanding of students with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), students without ADHD, and academic buoyancy itself. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 86-107.https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12007

Martin, A., & Marsh, H. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20149

Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008a). Workplace and academic buoyancy: Psychometric assessment and construct validity amongst school personnel and students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26(2), 168-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282907313767

Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2008b). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46(1), 53–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.01.002

Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2009). Academic resilience and academic buoyancy: multidimensional and hierarchical conceptual framing of courses correlates and cognate constructs. Oxford Review of Education, 35(3), 353-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980902934639

Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2019). Investigating the reciprocal relations between academic buoyancy and academic adversity: Evidence for the protective role of academic buoyancy in reducing academic adversity over time. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(4), 301-312.https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419885027

Martin, A. J., Yu, K., Ginns, P., & Papworth, B. (2017). Young people’s academic buoyancy and adaptability: A cross-cultural comparison of China with North America and the United Kingdom. Educational Psychology, 37(8), 930-946.https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1202904

Martin, A. J., Yu, K., Papworth, B., Ginns, P., & Collie, R. J. (2015). Motivation and engagement in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, and China: Testing a multi-dimensional framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282914546287

Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568

Milfont, T. L., & Fischer, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111-130.https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857

Miller, S., Connolly, P., & Maguire, L. K. (2013). Wellbeing, academic buoyancy and educational achievement in primary school students. International Journal of Educational Research, 62, 239-248. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.857

Olendo, R. A., Koinange, W. C., & Mugambi, D. (2019). Relationship between self-efficacy and academic buoyancy among form three students in selected secondary schools in Migori County, Kenya.International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 6(10), 161- 170. https://bit.ly/3a1XzaJ

Panayides, P. (2013). Coefficient alpha: Interpret with caution. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 687-696. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v9i4.653

Putwain, D. W., & Daly, A. L. (2013). Do clusters of test anxiety and academic buoyancy differentially predict academic performance? Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 157–162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.010

Putwain, D. W., Daly, A. L., Chamberlain, S., & Sadreddini, S. (2015). Academically buoyant students are less anxious about and perform better in high‐stakes examinations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 247-263.https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12068  

Putwain, D. W., Gallard, D., & Beaumont, J. (2020a). Academic buoyancy protects achievement against minor academic adversities. Learning and Individual Differences, 83-84, 1-8.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101936   

Putwain, D. W., Wood, P., & Pekrun, R. (2020b). Achievement emotions and academic achievement: Reciprocal relations and the moderating influence of academic buoyancy. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000637

Raykov, T. (2001). Bias of coefficient alpha for congeneric measures with correlated errors. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(1), 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216010251005

R Development Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Reddy, K. J., Menon, K. R., & Thattil, A. (2018). Academic stress and its sources among university students. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, 11(1), 531-537. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1404

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. URL http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/

Ursin, P., Järvinen, T., & Pihlaja, P. (2021). The role of academic buoyancy and social support in mediating associations between academic stress and school engagement in Finnish primary school children. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(4), 661-675. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1739135

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4 - 70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002

Verrier, D., Johnson, S., & Reidy, L. (2018). The teacher academic buoyancy scale: Is it possible to keep TABS on students’ academic buoyancy? International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 5(4), 659-667.https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.463871

Walker, B., Cheney, D., Stage, S., Blum, C., & Horner, R. H. (2005). School-wide screening and positive behavior supports. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7(4), 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007050070040101    

Yu, K., & Martin, A. J. (2014). Personal best (PB) and ‘classic’ achievement goals in the Chinese context: Their role in predicting academic motivation, engagement and buoyancy. Educational Psychology, 34(5), 635 –658 https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.895297  

...