logo logo European Journal of Educational Research

EU-JER is is a, peer reviewed, online academic research journal.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
Headquarters
7321 Parkway Drive South, Hanover, MD 21076, USA
content and language integrated learning pandemic primary school scaffolding translanguaging

Translanguaging as a Scaffolded Practice in a Primary School Content and Language Integrated Learning Context During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Rina Wahyu Setyaningrum , Slamet Setiawan , Syafi’ul Anam

Translanguaging enables students to communicate in multiple languages in an English-dominant classroom. It has received considerable attention from sc.

T

Translanguaging enables students to communicate in multiple languages in an English-dominant classroom. It has received considerable attention from scholars in content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Its implementation in primary schools in European countries has been adopted in Asian countries, including Indonesia. This study employed a narrative inquiry investigating a teacher who taught first graders both content matter and English during the COVID-19 forced-remote learning. Furthermore, data were gathered using semi-structured interviews to guide the participant in narrating CLIL science teaching experiences. Virtual observations were carried out eight times to obtain evidence of translanguaging practiced. Due to forced-remote learning, the results indicated that the teacher had to find the most convenient ways to instruct the young students without adding to their burden. Furthermore, it was reported that scaffolding by translanguaging was planned systematically by valuing the students’ L1 and alternating it with English as the target language. The findings also discussed the practical implications of this study to maintain young learners' (YLs) engagement through translanguaging strategies.

Keywords: Content and language integrated learning, pandemic, primary school, scaffolding, translanguaging.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
720
Download
643
Citations
Crossref
0

Scopus
0

References

Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/ghwrhc

Affouneh, S., Salha, S., & Khlaif, Z. N. (2020). Designing quality e-learning environments for emergency remote teaching in coronavirus crisis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 11(2), 135-137. https://doi.org/h8vd

Allard, E. C. (2017). Re-examining teacher translanguaging: An ecological perspective. Bilingual Research Journal, 40(2), 116–130. https://doi.org/dn75

Back, M., Han, M., & Weng, S. C. (2020). Emotional scaffolding for emergent multilingual learners through translanguaging: Case stories. Language and Education, 34(5), 387–406. https://doi.org/h8vf

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/f8848w

Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to corona virus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i-vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/fswdcx

Bridsell, B. J. (2021). CLIL in the times of COVID-19: Content, communication, and creative cognition in remote learning. The Journal of the Japan CLIL Pedagogy Association, 3, 134–149. https://bit.ly/3B5KLyR

Butler, Y. G. (2015). English language education among young learners in east Asia: A review of current research (2004-2014). Language Teaching, 48(3), 303–342. https://doi.org/h8vg

Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2017). Minority languages and sustainable translanguaging: Threat or opportunity? Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 38(10), 901–912.https://doi.org/ghxfrh

Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2019). Multilingualism, translanguaging, and minority languages in SLA. Modern Language Journal, 103, 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12529

Chang, W. L. M., & Haugh, M. (2020). The metapragmatics of “ teasing ” in Taiwanese Chinese conversational humour. European Journal of Humour Research, 8(4), 7–30. https://doi.org/gpgbnz

Chen, Y., Zhang, P., & Huang, L. (2021). Translanguaging/trans-semiotizing in teacher-learner interactions on social media: Making learner agency visible and achievable. System, 104, 1-13. https://doi.org/gntxg3

Clandinin, D. J., & Huber, J. (2010).Narrative inquiry. In B. McGaw, E. Baker, & P. P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 436-441). Elsevier. https://doi.org/dm9vff

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120–133. https://bit.ly/3T568H1

Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0

Coyle, Y., & Roca de Larios, J. (2020). Exploring young learners' engagement with models as a written corrective technique in EFL and CLIL settings. System, 95, 1-14. https://doi.org/gptgc5

Daniel, S. M., Jiménez, R. T., Pray, L., & Pacheco, M. B. (2019). Scaffolding to make translanguaging a classroom norm. TESOL Journal, 10(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.361

Duan, S. J., & Liu, J. H. (2017, December 16-17). Application of CLIL in teaching young learners about life cycle in English [Paper presentation]. 4th International Conference on Advanced Education and Management ICAEM 2017, Qingdao, China. https://doi.org/h8vh

Ellison, M. (2019). CLIL in the primary school context. In S. Garton & F. Copland (Eds.), The routledge handbook of teaching English to young learners (pp. 247–268). Routledge. https://doi.org/h8r6

Espinosa, C. M., Herrera, L. Y., & Gaudreau, C. M. (2016). Reclaiming bilingualism: Translanguaging in a science class. In O. Garcia & T. Kleyn (Eds.), Translanguaging with multilingual students: Learning from classroom moments (pp. 160–177). Routhledge.

Evnitskaya, N., & Berger, E. (2017). Learners’ multimodal displays of willingness to participate in classroom interaction in the L2 and CLIL contexts. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 71–94. https://doi.org/gh5n4f

Fernández-Fontecha, A., O’Halloran, K. L., Wignell, P., & Tan, S. (2020). Scaffolding CLIL in the science classroom via visual thinking: A systemic functional multimodal approach. Linguistics and Education, 55, 1-10. https://doi.org/gptgfz

Fernández, R. G. (2019). Translanguaging and equity in groupwork in the science classroom : Adding linguistic and cultural diversity to the equation. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(2), 383-391. https://doi.org/h8vc

García, O., & Wei, L. (2015). Translanguaging, bilingualism, and bilingual education. In W. E. Wright, S. Boun, & O. García (Eds.), The handbook of bilingual and multilingual education (pp. 223-240). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/h8r7

Garton, S., Copland, F., & Burns, A. (2013). Investigating global practices in teaching English to young learners. ELT Research Papers, 11(1), 1-24. https://bit.ly/3PsmHdM

Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Heinemann.

Gorter, D., & Arocena, E. (2020). Teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism in a course on translanguaging. System, 92, 1-10.https://doi.org/h8vb

Haydon, G., Browne, G., & van der Riet, P. (2018). Narrative inquiry as a research methodology exploring person centred care in nursing. Collegian, 25(1), 125–129. https://doi.org/dwp8

He, Y., & van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Animation and the remediation of school physics–a social semiotic approach. Social Semiotics, 30(5), 665–684. https://doi.org/gng8rn

James, N. (2018). Using narrative inquiry to explore the experience of one ethnically diverse ESL nursing student. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 13(1), 35–40. https://doi.org/h8t9

Jenkovic, N., & Cvetkovic, M. (2012). Curiosity and creativity - A perfect foundations for CLIL. In R. Popovic & V. Savic (Eds.), Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in teaching English to young learners (pp. 21-34). City Press.

Jonsson, C., & Blåsjö, M. (2020). Translanguaging and multimodality in workplace texts and writing. International Journal of Multilingualism, 17(3), 361–381. https://doi.org/gjds8q

Kirkpatrick, A., & Liddicoat, A. J. (2020). English and language policies in East and Southeast Asia. In K. Bolton, W. Botha, & A. Kirkpaatrick. The handbook of Asian Englishes (pp. 81–105). Wiley. https://doi.org/h8r8

Lestariyana, R. P. D., & Widodo, H. P. (2018). Engaging young learners of English with digital stories: Learning to mean. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 489–495. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i2.13314

Lewis, G., Jones, B., & Baker, C. (2012). Translanguaging: Developing its conceptualisation and contextualisation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(7), 655–670.https://doi.org/gk5p9x

Li, D., & Zhang, L. (2020). Exploring teacher scaffolding in a CLIL-framed EFL intensive reading class: A classroom discourse analysis approach. Language Teaching Research, 26(3), 333-360.https://doi.org/h8t8

Lin, A. M. Y. (2019). Theories of trans/languaging and trans-semiotizing: Implications for content-based education classrooms. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/gh5n4g

Lin, A. M. Y., & He, P. (2017). Translanguaging as dynamic activity flows in CLIL classrooms. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 16(4), 228–244. https://doi.org/h8t7

Liu, Y. (2020). Translanguaging and trans-semiotizing as planned systematic scaffolding: Examining feeling-meaning in CLIL classrooms. English Teaching and Learning, 44(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/h8t6

Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 8(3), 3351–33514. https://bit.ly/2Hveaqv

Mehisto, P. (2012). Criteria for producing CLIL learning material. Encuentro, 21, 15–33. https://bit.ly/3c7G5hG

Mehisto, P., & Teresa Ting, Y. (2017). CLIL essentials for secondary school teachers. Cambridge University Press.

Monbec, L. (2020). Scaffolding content in an online content and language integrated learning (CLIL) module. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(2), 157-173. https://doi.org/gptgf2

Moore, E., Evnitskaya, N., & Ramos-de Robles, S. L. (2018). Teaching and learning science in linguistically diverse classrooms. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(2), 341–352. https://doi.org/gnmn35

Nguyen, H. T. M. (2011). Primary English language education policy in Vietnam: Insights from implementation. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(2), 225–249. https://doi.org/bwwxr9

Nikolov, M., & Mihaljević Djigunović, J. (2019). Teaching young language learners. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp.577-599). Spinger. https://doi.org/h8r9

Nikula, T., & Moore, P. (2016). Exploring translanguaging in CLIL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 237-249. https://doi.org/gg26f2

Norman, N. (2012). An examination of the benefits and drawbacks of translanguaging in CLIL science classrooms : An examination into Spanish primary contexts [Unpublished master's thesis]. Universidad Complutense De Madrid.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/gfzk5k

Pinter, A. (2011). Children learning second languages. Palgrave Macmillan.

Prasongporn, P. (2009, June 9-11). CLIL in Thailand: Challenges and possibilities. Teaching English, future challenges [Paper presentation]. Access English EBE Symposium Jakarta, Indonesia. https://bit.ly/3IUPuFs

Rixon, S. (2019). Developing curricula for young language learners. In X. Gao (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 277-295). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/h8sb

Setyaningrum, R. W., Setiawan, S., Anam, S., & Retnaningdyah, P. (2020). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) in science class during Covid-19 outbreak: A narrative inquiry. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(1), 35–46. https://bit.ly/3wkQjSH

Shin, J.-Y., Dixon, L. Q., & Choi, Y. (2019). An updated review on use of L1 in foreign language classrooms. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(5), 406-419. https://doi.org/h8sn

Shin, J. (2006). Ten helpful ideas for teaching English to young learners. English Teaching Forum, 2, 1-13. https://bit.ly/3v7KxTP

Shin, J., & Crandall, J. (2014). Teaching young learners English: From theory to practice. Heinle Cengage Learning.

Sulistiyo, U., Haryanto, E., Widodo, H. P., & Elyas, T. (2019). The portrait of primary school English in Indonesia : Policy recommendations. Education 3-13, 48(8), 945-959. https://doi.org/h8sm

Tsuchiya, K., & Perez Murillo, M. D. (2019). Content and language integrated learning in Spanish and Japanese contexts. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/h8sc

Vaish, V. (2019). Challenges and directions in implementing translanguaging pedagogy for low achieving students. Classroom Discourse, 10(3–4), 274–289. https://doi.org/h8sk

Vázquez, V. P., & Ordóñez, M. C. R. (2018). Describing the use of the L1 in CLIL : An analysis of L1 communication strategies in classroom interaction. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/h8sj

Wang, D. (2019). Translanguaging in Chinese foreign language classrooms: Students and teachers’ attitudes and practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/gk929j

Wei, L., & Yin, A. M. Y. (2019). Translanguaging classroom discourse: Pushing limits, breaking boundaries. Classroom Discourse, 10(3–4), 209–215. https://doi.org/gk5p9z

Wei, R., & Feng, J. (2015). Implementing CLIL for young learners in an EFL context beyond Europe. English Today, 31(1), 55-60. https://doi.org/h8sh

Widodo, H. P. (2014). Methodological considerations in interview data transcription. International Journal of Innovation in English Language, 3(1), 101–107. https://bit.ly/3BbfpHa

Williams, M. (2020). Fifth graders ’ use of gesture and models when translanguaging during a content and language integrated science class in Hong Kong. International Jornal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(4), 1304–1323. https://doi.org/gh4468

Xie, K. (2020). Projecting learner engagement in remote contexts using empathic design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 81–85. https://doi.org/h8sg

Yamano, Y. (2013). Utilizing the CLIL approach in Japanese primary school: A comparative study of CLIL and EFL lesson. The Asian EFL Journal Special Edition CLIL in Asian Contexts: Emerging Trends, 15(4), 159–182. https://bit.ly/3v95E8l

Yang, W. (2015). Content and language integrated learning next in Asia: Evidence of learners’ achievement in CLIL education from a Taiwan tertiary degree programme. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(4), 361–382. https://doi.org/h8sf

Zein, S. (2019). Translanguaging in the EYL classroom as a metadiscursive practice. In S. Zein & R. Stroupe (Eds.), English language teacher preparation in Asia: Policy, research and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/h8sd

...